-
Good college starter
Re: B.1.1.529?
Originally Posted by diamenz
alright, then i'll quote that article.
The cdc are going to push the vaccines, period. in this case, they're doing it as a precautionary.
bro, i get it - i don't like it either. pharmaceutical companies are milking this for all it's worth and the government along with the media are enabling them, but back to the original point... the vaccines don't prevent spread & infection, so the fact that the vaccinated are catching omicron doesn't mean shit. it does not mean the vaccines aren't doing their job in preventing and/or lowering the probability of serious illness and death. the effectiveness of that is of course up for debate.
It means everything. If you don't know the effectiveness, then don't push for a vaccine that has a chance to turn out to be useless.
-
GSW Fan Since the 90s
Re: B.1.1.529?
Originally Posted by Off the Court
The vaccine doesn't stop cases it only stops deaths.
Hmm, are there any RCTs that have shown a statistically significant difference in deaths? theman93 actually posted about the Pfizer trial that showed no statistically significant difference in deaths between the vaccine and placebo groups.
Originally Posted by theman93
15 patients who received the vaccine died; 14 who received the placebo died.
baudkarma, who has claimed outrageous things in the past, posted in the thread. Unfortunately he (once again) abandoned the thread when he was asked to back up his claims.
http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/sho...1#post14410653
-
GSW Fan Since the 90s
Re: B.1.1.529?
Trump's travel restrictions for Covid-19 began in January 2020. Biden kept them going.
Does anyone know how many Covid-19 infections Trump/Biden's travel restrictions have prevented so far in the US? (Any recent studies and/or estimates?)
-
NBA Superstar
Re: B.1.1.529?
-
The Bearded Menace
Re: B.1.1.529?
Originally Posted by theman93
It means everything. If you don't know the effectiveness, then don't push for a vaccine that has a chance to turn out to be useless.
Without the existence of these vaccines, there's a big chance that the world economy would have been in a complete standstill until now.
-
Local High School Star
Re: B.1.1.529?
Originally Posted by Axe
Without the existence of these vaccines, there's a big chance that the world economy would have been in a complete standstill until now.
You mean the Operation Warp Speed Mr. Donald Trump vaccines?
-
Good college starter
Re: B.1.1.529?
Originally Posted by Cleverness
Hmm, are there any RCTs that have shown a statistically significant difference in deaths? theman93 actually posted about the Pfizer trial that showed no statistically significant difference in deaths between the vaccine and placebo groups.
baudkarma, who has claimed outrageous things in the past, posted in the thread. Unfortunately he (once again) abandoned the thread when he was asked to back up his claims.
http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/sho...1#post14410653
There has been an UPDATE***** to this study.
21 patients who received the vaccine died, not 15.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/fd...rs-jab-trials/
-
Good college starter
-
The Bearded Menace
Re: B.1.1.529?
Originally Posted by AKA_AAP
You mean covid happened under Mr. Donald Trump?
Originally Posted by theman93
Nah.
But since you believe that you should be cursing Donald Trump's administration for causing the pandemic.
Ftfy guys
-
GSW Fan Since the 90s
Re: B.1.1.529?
Originally Posted by theman93
Wow. Thanks for the update. diamenz, you seeing this?
It would be nice if we had a Covid "vaccine" with an RCT showing a reduction in death & hospitalization, but I can't find one.
-
GSW Fan Since the 90s
Re: B.1.1.529?
Originally Posted by theman93
Nah.
But since you believe that you should be thanking Donald Trump for saving the world.
Trump told Axe to social distance, wear masks, and get the vaccine... Axe took his advice literally and has been preaching it on this forum quite a bit as of late... we shouldn't be surprised to know that Axe is a big fan of Trump and Trump's Covid-19 team.
-
NBA rookie of the year
Re: B.1.1.529?
Originally Posted by Cleverness
Wow. Thanks for the update. diamenz, you seeing this?
It would be nice if we had a Covid "vaccine" with an RCT showing a reduction in death & hospitalization, but I can't find one.
discouraging... personally especially. i like to think my parents (77 & 78) are safer with the jab. now, not so much...
Despite a group of doctors and academics filing a lawsuit to obtain the FDA’s complete data profile of the Pfizer jab, the agency suspiciously denied the request for transparency and asked a judge to delay the release of the data until the year 2076, some 55 years after the FDA gave the green light to roll out the experimental shots to millions of people in the country.
hmm...?
-
Good college starter
-
GSW Fan Since the 90s
Re: B.1.1.529?
Originally Posted by diamenz
discouraging... personally especially. i like to think my parents (77 & 78) are safer with the jab. now, not so much...
hmm...?
As I've said on here a few times, I *think* the jab would be good for elderly folk who haven't already had Covid, but
- I don't know. it's based on anecdotes and limited data.
- their effectiveness is massively overrated and quite frankly, unknown at this point because we don't have any solid trials (that I know of) showing a reduction in hospitalization & death.
We know that many people are classified as a Covid hospitalization even though they may have already been in the hospital otherwise. This helps explain why hospitalizations are way below what they were in 2018 & 2019 vs 2020. Check this link out... https://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/COVIDNet/COVID19_5.html ... shows 29.2% Covid hospitalizations with Pregnancy as an underlying medical condition... begs the question... how many of these women would have been to the hospital regardless of Covid? Perhaps they were delivering a baby and caught a cold (Covid) in the hospital during their stay or some routine procedure and happened to test positive...? who knows...
-
Good college starter
Re: B.1.1.529?
Originally Posted by Cleverness
As I've said on here a few times, I *think* the jab would be good for elderly folk who haven't already had Covid, but
- I don't know. it's based on anecdotes and limited data.
- their effectiveness is massively overrated and quite frankly, unknown at this point because we don't have any solid trials (that I know of) showing a reduction in hospitalization & death.
We know that many people are classified as a Covid hospitalization even though they may have already been in the hospital otherwise. This helps explain why hospitalizations are way below what they were in 2018 & 2019 vs 2020. Check this link out... https://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/COVIDNet/COVID19_5.html ... shows 29.2% Covid hospitalizations with Pregnancy as an underlying medical condition... begs the question... how many of these women would have been to the hospital regardless of Covid? Perhaps they were delivering a baby and caught a cold (Covid) in the hospital during their stay or some routine procedure and happened to test positive...? who knows...
This could help provide some answers
https://beckernews.com/new-covid-pol...d-proof-43258/
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|