The Time Michael Jordan Lost A One-On-One Game Against A 45-Year-Old Mutual Fund CEO

[Full Court]

OP's attempt at disparaging Jordan would have been more effective if he hadn't actually linked to the video lol.

[baudkarma]

There are games within games. There's a Youtube posted recently where some high school star challenges 43-year-old Brian Scalabrine to a game of one-on-one to 11. Scal not only wins, he shuts the kid out. Scal has played guys who were pros overseas, starters on their D1 college teams, and beaten them easily. The talent gap between an NBA player... even a marginal one like Scal... and the rest of us is enormous. The only way Jordan would lose that game is if he was trying to.

Try this scenario. MJ and the other guy play golf the day before. They bet, but instead of money, they guy says that if he beats MJ at golf he wants to MJ to let himself be beat in a 1-on-1 game of basketball.

[Full Court]

Hey OP, here's a question, and answer it honestly.

Do you really think that the 45-year-old CEO was a better basketball player than Jordan?

Think carefully before you answer, because it's a catch 22.

If you say yes, then you're an idiot.

If you say no, then there's absolutely no point to your thread, and you're an idiot.

[SATAN]

There are games within games. There's a Youtube posted recently where some high school star challenges 43-year-old Brian Scalabrine to a game of one-on-one to 11. Scal not only wins, he shuts the kid out. Scal has played guys who were pros overseas, starters on their D1 college teams, and beaten them easily. The talent gap between an NBA player... even a marginal one like Scal... and the rest of us is enormous. The only way Jordan would lose that game is if he was trying to.

Try this scenario. MJ and the other guy play golf the day before. They bet, but instead of money, they guy says that if he beats MJ at golf he wants to MJ to let himself be beat in a 1-on-1 game of basketball.

Michael Jordan lost a game of one on one versus a 45 year old mutual fund CEO. There is no conspiracy here.

[TheCorporation]

There are games within games. There's a Youtube posted recently where some high school star challenges 43-year-old Brian Scalabrine to a game of one-on-one to 11. Scal not only wins, he shuts the kid out. Scal has played guys who were pros overseas, starters on their D1 college teams, and beaten them easily. The talent gap between an NBA player... even a marginal one like Scal... and the rest of us is enormous. The only way Jordan would lose that game is if he was trying to.

Try this scenario. MJ and the other guy play golf the day before. They bet, but instead of money, they guy says that if he beats MJ at golf he wants to MJ to let himself be beat in a 1-on-1 game of basketball.

Swap Pete Myers for CEO John Rogers and maybe those Bulls win it all in 1994

[Hey Yo]

Swap Pete Myers for CEO John Rogers and maybe those Bulls win it all in 1994

you're probably right.

[TheCorporation]

you're probably right.

I guarantee Rogers is putting up more than 2 ppg Myers We know that much!

[Baller789]

you're probably right.

Swap Pete Myers for CEO John Rogers and maybe those Bulls win it all in 1994

I guarantee Rogers is putting up more than 2 ppg Myers We know that much!

So you guys are saying that Rogers is a low key NBA level player.

No wonder Jorden lost. He actually is better than he seems!

[TheCorporation]

So you guys are saying that Rogers is a low key NBA level player.

No wonder Jorden lost. He actually is better than he seems!

Rogers is equal to MJ level impact

[Baller789]

Sure why not.

[Lebron23]

[Axe]

Plus wheelchair eric barber.