Was widespread fraud needed to steal the 2016 or 2020 election?

[paksat]

the fact that youtube had to take the dislike button down is all you needed to know

demorats can't accept the fraud for what it is, they'd rather lie to themselves while paying double the cost on everything. It really has no end in sight, will they lie to themselves till they're hungry on the street? Is there a breaking point?

[Jasper]

the fact that youtube had to take the dislike button down is all you needed to know

demorats can't accept the fraud for what it is, they'd rather lie to themselves while paying double the cost on everything. It really has no end in sight, will they lie to themselves till they're hungry on the street? Is there a breaking point?

point on you believe what youtube shows you lmfao

[Shooter]

Trump was victorious because he won 3 states that he wasn't supposed to by a combined 80,000 votes, while Biden did the same thing in 2020 by a combined 46,000 votes.

So if 99.99% of the ballots could be legit and only 80k or 46k needed to be fraudulent, on what planet was widespread fraud needed to steal the election?

When people studied the reasons why Trump won and saw the 80k margin, this set the playbook for 2020 - operatives knew that a few thousand stuffed ballots in 3 states was enough to steal it..

I'm not advocating that either election was stolen - I'm just pointing out that it's ludicrous to think that widespread fraud was needed - the media planted that phrase in our minds and mass formation ensued.

Your kindergarten level of understanding even simple concepts is alarming. You're a moron when you're in or out of the basketball section.

[Patrick Chewing]

point on you believe what youtube shows you lmfao

what?

[Patrick Chewing]

the fact that youtube had to take the dislike button down is all you needed to know

demorats can't accept the fraud for what it is, they'd rather lie to themselves while paying double the cost on everything. It really has no end in sight, will they lie to themselves till they're hungry on the street? Is there a breaking point?

There is no breaking point for Democrats. They are all part of a cult. They would all take a poison pill and kill themselves if it meant staying true to their warped beliefs and ideology.

[Off the Court]

what?

His point is that YouTube likes and dislikes aren't a real gauge and anyone looking at that as a legit barometer is retarded.

If YouTube is our official gauge then that means we need to make Daddy Yankee POTUS. He has the most likes on YouTube.

[Lakers Legend#32]

There is no breaking point for Democrats. They are all part of a cult. They would all take a poison pill and kill themselves if it meant staying true to their warped beliefs and ideology.

Poopsie projecting again.

[Nanners]

It would be a lot easier to believe the dems didnt rig the 2020 election if they hadnt blatantly rigged their own primary in both 2016 and 2020

[diamenz]

It would be a lot easier to believe the dems didnt rig the 2020 election if they hadnt blatantly rigged their own primary in both 2016 and 2020

if bernie had any balls to really call out dc corruption, the presidency would have been his.

[Nanners]

if bernie had any balls to really call out dc corruption, the presidency would have been his.

No kidding... bernie is a pathetic cuck (and I say that as someone who donated (what a waste of money) and voted for him in 2016 and 2020)

[Norcaliblunt]

Lol at believing any election was ever real. Lmao. You vote with your energy, time, and money.


And a big LOL at people who thought Bernie or Trump were ever legit. Suckas born every second.

[Nanners]

Lol at believing any election was ever real. Lmao. You vote with your energy, time, and money.


And a big LOL at people who thought Bernie or Trump were ever legit. Suckas born every second.

I agree that Bernie and Trump arent legit, but big LOL at people who cant see the obvious differences in the 2016/2020 primaries and elections involving Bernie and Trump, compared to the more traditional primaries/elections like 2012/2008/2004/2000/etc where there were no candidates who even pretended to be anti-establishment and there was no need to openly rig anything.

[Norcaliblunt]

I agree that Bernie and Trump arent legit, but big LOL at people who cant see the obvious differences in the 2016/2020 primaries and elections involving Bernie and Trump, compared to the more traditional primaries/elections like 2012/2008/2004/2000/etc where there were no candidates who even pretended to be anti-establishment and there was no need to openly rig anything.

There was a guy named Ralph Nader back in 2000 and 2004. Read up on him and what happened to his campaign. Lol.

[Nanners]

There was a guy named Ralph Nader back in 2000 and 2004. Read up on him and what happened to his campaign. Lol.

Like I said, there was no need to rig anything in those years... Nader ran third party and only got ~1% of the vote in 2000 and ~0.5% of the vote in 2004.

Anyway are you saying that Nader is legit? I thought you said all elections are fake and gay?

[kabar]

No kidding... bernie is a pathetic cuck (and I say that as someone who donated (what a waste of money) and voted for him in 2016 and 2020)

haha This cuck actually donates to political campaigns.