Shaquille O'Neal and Kobe Bryant Stats when they were teammates in Los Angeles

[red1]

Face it Kobe fans. He was Robin to Shaq's Batman.

big facts.

[Lebron23]

You stupid filipino i swear.....my god I would smack the shit out of you

Make me some Burger and fries

[k0kakw0rld]

Shaq is always been a better player than Kobe.

[red1]

Make me some Burger and fries

get that boy back in the kitchen, flipping burgers like he was destined to do

[ImKobe]

True, you would never cherry pick like that.

So Bran stans can cherry pick stats and do all this shit and as soon as I use their own logic against them it's not fair? lol.

[1987_Lakers]

Shaq is always been a better player than Kobe.

[Legend248]

Make me some Burger and fries

dont make me have to body bag you boy

[shrempf_on_rice]

This is a Kobe and Shaq thread you brain dead moron. Stop posting, go back to dormancy... your brain is trash and you offer nothing positive to this board.

When I grow up, I want to be an internet tough guy like this dude. He feels so important and smart.

[WhiteKyrie]

2000? No argument

2001? It was a solidified one - two punch from two alphas and Kobe was a bonnafife superstar and top five player in the game

WCF - 2001 vs Spurs

Kobe: 33 ppg, 7 rpg, 7 apg, 2 spg, 1 bpg
>
Shaq: 27 ppg, 13 rpg, 3 apg

WCF - 2002 vs Kings

Shaq: 30 ppg, 14 rpg, 2 apg
Kobe: 27 ppg, 6 rpg, 4 apg

Pretty equal there …

2003 - WCSF vs Spurs

Kobe: 32 ppg, 5 rpg, 4 apg
>
Shaq: 25 ppg, 14 rpg, 4 apg

2004 - WCF vs T-Wolves

Kobe: 24 ppg, 4 rpg, 6 apg
>
Shaq: 21 ppg, 16 rpg, 3 apg

It’s not so cut and dry. Shaq feasted on some horrendous center opposition in the Finals during that three peat stretch. Kobe was usually their best player 2000 withstanding up until whatever the Finals opponent was by that point

[red1]

2000? No argument

2001? It was a solidified one - two punch from two alphas and Kobe was a bonnafife superstar and top five player in the game

WCF - 2001 vs Spurs

Kobe: 33 ppg, 7 rpg, 7 apg, 2 spg, 1 bpg
>
Shaq: 27 ppg, 13 rpg, 3 apg

WCF - 2002 vs Kings

Shaq: 30 ppg, 14 rpg, 2 apg
Kobe: 27 ppg, 6 rpg, 4 apg

Pretty equal there …

2003 - WCSF vs Spurs

Kobe: 32 ppg, 5 rpg, 4 apg
>
Shaq: 25 ppg, 14 rpg, 4 apg

2004 - WCF vs T-Wolves

Kobe: 24 ppg, 4 rpg, 6 apg
>
Shaq: 21 ppg, 16 rpg, 3 apg

It’s not so cut and dry. Shaq feasted on some horrendous center opposition in the Finals during that three peat stretch. Kobe was usually their best player 2000 withstanding up until whatever the Finals opponent was by that point

the opposing coach every game was forced to count how many bigs he would have in the game after shaq fouled out his starting center and backup center


meanwhile kobe was a top-3 perimeter player in the league.



shaq was unstoppable those years. I think vince or iverson would win 2 or 3 easy rings if they swapped places with kobe.

[Shooter]

Wtf! Lestains, I swear.

Do you honestly believe your bum would've won anything until he had to bail and form a super team? Actin like he's won 10 rings. And don't give me the stat bullshit, even with all that statpadding the bitch didn't even make the playoffs. The most overated player of any sport.

Meltdown. Pitiful one too.

Back to lurking for you, troll.

[FKAri]

Shaq got to stat pad in the finals vs historically awful Eastern conference champs.

Wtf! Lestains, I swear.

Do you honestly believe your bum would've won anything until he had to bail and form a super team? Actin like he's won 10 rings. And don't give me the stat bullshit, even with all that statpadding the bitch didn't even make the playoffs. The most overated player of any sport.

Bad day?

[WhiteKyrie]

Shaq got to stat pad in the finals vs historically awful Eastern conference champs.

2000 Pacers were very good, although just a couple years past their prime. 2001 Sixers besides Iverson and the 2002 Nets besides Kidd? Pretty putrid indeed. Real test was always the conference finals out west in those seasons.

[FKAri]

2000 Pacers were very good, although just a couple years past their prime. 2001 Sixers besides Iverson and the 2002 Nets besides Kidd? Pretty putrid indeed. Real test was always the conference finals out west in those seasons.

The best positional opposition Shaq faced was a 250lbs Dikembe Mutombo. He should be expected to dominate those teams.

[WhiteKyrie]

The best positional opposition Shaq faced was a 250lbs Dikembe Mutombo. He should be expected to dominate those teams.

I’m agreeing. Just saying that 2000 Pacers team was pretty good and the series was competitive. And that Pacers team was just a few years older than they were at their best in the late 90s.