.
Surely Payton thinks Magic is a better all-round player than MJ too, but Magic is still below MJ as a basketball player just like Lebron is (and MJ was a better PG than Magic when he played that position in 89' anyway, so Payton is wrong even by his own flawed logic of inflating point-guard-style players)
Ultimately, ball-dominators like Magic, Lebron, and Luka have the following flaws:
* can't run off-screens and play off-guard OR DEFEND off-guards, aka Klay, Reggie Miller, Curry, MJ
* can't carry the scoring load and therefore needs all-time scoring help like Kareem, Wade, AD, Kyrie
If required to carry the scoring load, the skillsets of Lebron, Luka, Magic, or Westbrook are too ball-dominant to beat top teams and therefore need elite 1st options at sidekick like Kareem, Durant, Wade, AD, Kyrie, etc.. Otoh, expert jumpshooters can carry the scoring load against top teams (maintain ball movement), so they can win secondary producers like Wiggins or Pippen and don't need all-time scoring help like ball-dominators.. People forget that GM's prefer to build a contender cheaply with defenders but this requires a 1st option that can carry the scoring load like Curry or MJ (expert jumpshooters), otherwise the GM must find expensive scoring help to support inferior brands of ball (ball-dominators).
Ultimately, expert jumpshooters can defeat maximum defensive attention (carry the scoring load in playoffs and Finals of title run), so they need the least scoring help, thereby building dynasties with the least help (secondary producders like Wiggins, Pippen and cheap defenders).
* Uncoachable - they never evolved out of ball-dominant offenses that revolve around them, thus forcing coaches into a predictable heliocentric offense where 80% of the team plays a spot-up role - this garbage brand of ball predictably requires goat supporting talent and has lower team ceilings/Finals records than expected
* impose spot-up roles that stall young players, so they lack the teammate development, fits, and brand of ball needed to win organically and must be talent-based winners instead (team-hoppers or colluders... all-star game strategy).. aka they never really learn how to win (organic) and only learn how to collude/team-hop.
* turnover prone and uses teammates as bailout options instead of being a bailout option for teammates (elevating teammates)