Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 51
  1. #31
    NBA Legend FKAri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    16,625

    Default Re: Do you think that the Suns finals run in 1993 was a fluke.

    Quote Originally Posted by L.Kizzle View Post
    Drexler was injured in 92 as well.
    This brings MJ down to negative 2 rings. Is that the worst ring total in NBA history? Wow!

  2. #32
    Euros rule NBA, UMAD? Phoenix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    9,567

    Default Re: Do you think that the Suns finals run in 1993 was a fluke.

    3ball has managed to de-legitimize the entire Bull dynasty in a random thread on a Tuesday afternoon, right before his weekly banning kicks in.

  3. #33
    Embiid > Jokic SouBeachTalents's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    27,281

    Default Re: Do you think that the Suns finals run in 1993 was a fluke.

    Quote Originally Posted by Phoenix View Post
    3ball has managed to de-legitimize the entire Bull dynasty in a random thread on a Tuesday afternoon, right before his weekly banning kicks in.
    Undid 50,000 posts and a decade of dedication in less than an hour No easy feat.

  4. #34
    7-time NBA All-Star
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Posts
    12,332

    Default Re: Do you think that the Suns finals run in 1993 was a fluke.

    In addition to the 16' ring being tainted by Curry's injury and Dray suspension, the 2009 Magic had the injury excuse but still won as a massive underdog - all-star Jameer Nelson didn't play in that series..

    Mo averaged 18 on 38%, so Lebron never beat a top 5 SRS team with poor scoring and efficiency from a sidekick - he's too ball-dominant at carry-job volume to beat top teams, so he needs all-time scoring help like AD, Wade or Kyrie and can't win with the secondary producers that expert jumpshooters win with (Wiggins, Pippen, Terry, Lowry, Pau, Klay)

  5. #35
    ... on a leash ArbitraryWater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    I walk a higher path, son
    Posts
    46,635

    Default Re: Do you think that the Suns finals run in 1993 was a fluke.

    Quote Originally Posted by L.Kizzle View Post
    Drexler was injured in 92 as well.
    Was he actually? Lol

  6. #36
    College superstar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Memphis
    Posts
    4,706

    Default Re: Do you think that the Suns finals run in 1993 was a fluke.


  7. #37
    Embiid > Jokic SouBeachTalents's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    27,281

    Default Re: Do you think that the Suns finals run in 1993 was a fluke.

    An injury to EVERY Finals opponent during the first 3peat Triple asterisk.

  8. #38
    NBA All-star NBAGOAT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    North Korea
    Posts
    9,342

    Default Re: Do you think that the Suns finals run in 1993 was a fluke.

    That core was still a contender tbf. Better teams than the suns have struggled in the playoffs and needed ref luck. Yea they choked pretty badly in 94/95 but you can also look at it from the perspective of they played the champs as close as anyone those 2 years with a worse version of their 93 team

  9. #39
    College superstar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Memphis
    Posts
    4,706

    Default Re: Do you think that the Suns finals run in 1993 was a fluke.

    Quote Originally Posted by Phoenix View Post
    3ball has managed to de-legitimize the entire Bull dynasty in a random thread on a Tuesday afternoon, right before his weekly banning kicks in.

    Quote Originally Posted by SouBeachTalents View Post
    Undid 50,000 posts and a decade of dedication in less than an hour No easy feat.


    Quote Originally Posted by SouBeachTalents View Post
    An injury to EVERY Finals opponent during the first 3peat Triple asterisk.

    This thread has unexpectedly become very hilarious.

  10. #40
    National High School Star
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    2,271

    Default Re: Do you think that the Suns finals run in 1993 was a fluke.

    Quote Originally Posted by L.Kizzle View Post
    You're right. Still lost tho, both times.
    It was because of Barkley's back. Check his numbers in the 94 playoffs. He was going at >30ppg in Rd1 and over the first couple game vs the rockets. And the Suns were rolling. Then his back injury from that year was started to flare up and his level fell off a cliff. This
    article after the game 7 loss tells the story...


    https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-...780-story.html

  11. #41
    National High School Star
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    2,271

    Default Re: Do you think that the Suns finals run in 1993 was a fluke.

    Quote Originally Posted by ArbitraryWater View Post
    could Chuck have won the 94 MVP if he hadnt gone down? He was averaging 25/12/5 on 53% at that point, not too far off his 93 campaign. The rest of the way with the game he got injured in he did 19/11/4 on 47%.
    I think Hakeem would have won MVP still. He was epic that season. Unless the Suns got to a crazy record like 67+ wins or something.

    However we should in reality be talking about Barkley as a 2x MVP (1990 he was genuinely the true winner) and, had his back held out for another year, he would have been a FMVP in 1994 as well.

  12. #42
    ... on a leash ArbitraryWater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    I walk a higher path, son
    Posts
    46,635

    Default Re: Do you think that the Suns finals run in 1993 was a fluke.

    Quote Originally Posted by AussieSteve View Post
    I think Hakeem would have won MVP still. He was epic that season. Unless the Suns got to a crazy record like 67+ wins or something.

    However we should in reality be talking about Barkley as a 2x MVP (1990 he was genuinely the true winner) and, had his back held out for another year, he would have been a FMVP in 1994 as well.

  13. #43
    7-time NBA All-Star
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Posts
    12,332

    Default Re: Do you think that the Suns finals run in 1993 was a fluke.

    Quote Originally Posted by AussieSteve View Post
    I think Hakeem would have won MVP still. He was epic that season. Unless the Suns got to a crazy record like 67+ wins or something.

    However we should in reality be talking about Barkley as a 2x MVP (1990 he was genuinely the true winner) and, had his back held out for another year, he would have been a FMVP in 1994 as well.

    Jordan should've been MVP in 1990 and it isn't close:


    1990 Jordan....... 31.2 PER.... 11.2 BPM... 10.6 VORP... 0.285 WS/48... 34/7/6
    1990 Barkley...... 27.1 PER...... 8.2 BPM'.... 8.0 VORP... 0.269 WS/48... 25/12/4


    Barkley's 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th options had higher PER, BPM, WS/48, PPG and efficiency than Jordan's 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th options, yet Barkley only won 53 games compared to 55 for Jordan.

    In the playoffs, Jordan averaged 43 ppg and destroyed Barkley's 6-year organic team (easily superior than say the 2018 Celtics)

    Btw, Lebron never received a 7 ppg rookie where everyone said "Okay that's it!!! Lebron has what he needs!!!"... No one said that for Jordan either and the Bulls had among the worst casts in the league (the worst casts from 88-90' according to Ben Taylor).. So MJ lost to dynasties with horrific casts, while Lebron lost to 1-star teams as the massive favorite twice (09', 11')
    Last edited by 3ba11; 03-21-2023 at 10:03 PM.

  14. #44
    National High School Star
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    2,271

    Default Re: Do you think that the Suns finals run in 1993 was a fluke.

    Quote Originally Posted by 3ba11 View Post
    Jordan should've been MVP in 1990 and it isn't close:


    1990 Jordan....... 31.2 PER.... 11.2 BPM... 10.6 VORP... 0.285 WS/48... 34/7/6
    1990 Barkley...... 27.1 PER...... 8.2 BPM'.... 8.0 VORP... 0.269 WS/48... 25/12/4


    Barkley's 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th options had higher PER, BPM, WS/48, PPG and efficiency than Jordan's 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th options, yet Barkley only won 53 games compared to 55 for Jordan.

    In the playoffs, Jordan averaged 43 ppg and destroyed Barkley's 6-year organic team (easily superior than say the 2018 Celtics)

    Btw, Lebron never received a 7 ppg rookie where everyone said "Okay that's it!!! Lebron has what he needs!!!"... No one said that for Jordan either and the Bulls had among the worst casts in the league (the worst casts from 88-90' according to Ben Taylor).. So MJ lost to dynasties with horrific casts, while Lebron lost to 1-star teams as the massive favorite twice (09', 11')
    We can argue all we want about who was the best player and who should have won MVP.

    I'm just saying that Barkley actually did win it. By quite a margin. 38 1st place votes to Magic's 27. As we know, Magic favouring voters who left Barkley off their ballot entirely is why he didn't win it.

  15. #45
    Lol RRR3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    47,422

    Default Re: Do you think that the Suns finals run in 1993 was a fluke.

    Quote Originally Posted by SouBeachTalents View Post
    An injury to EVERY Finals opponent during the first 3peat Triple asterisk.
    LeBron more real rings than MJ confirmed

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •