-
...
Re: Sansterre's Top 100 Teams of All Time
What's going on in 2009 and 2010?
92. The 2009 Orlando Magic
65. The 2009 Denver Nuggets
38. The 2009 Cleveland Cavaliers
11. The 2009 Los Angeles Lakers
90. The 2010 Boston Celtics
52. The 2010 Los Angeles Lakers
32. The 2010 Orlando Magic
4 teams in one year?
2010 Orlando Magic?
What happened here?
-
Re: Sansterre's Top 100 Teams of All Time
09 Lakers should be higher. Ben Taylor's healthy SRS has them at +9.0, which is one of the highest in history, and they rank top ten all-time in average ELO rating, peak ELO rating, and ending ELO rating. They also had a 12.5 SRS in the postseason and the Kobe/Pau/Odom trio had the highest net rating of any trio of the post Jordan era outside of peak Warriors. They were utterly dominant.
-
Pass The Salt
Re: Sansterre's Top 100 Teams of All Time
Originally Posted by iamgine
What's going on in 2009 and 2010?
92. The 2009 Orlando Magic
65. The 2009 Denver Nuggets
38. The 2009 Cleveland Cavaliers
11. The 2009 Los Angeles Lakers
90. The 2010 Boston Celtics
52. The 2010 Los Angeles Lakers
32. The 2010 Orlando Magic
4 teams in one year?
2010 Orlando Magic?
What happened here?
I didn't even notice this at first. What the **** are these teams doing on that list?
-
Embiid > Jokic
Re: Sansterre's Top 100 Teams of All Time
Originally Posted by iamgine
What's going on in 2009 and 2010?
92. The 2009 Orlando Magic
65. The 2009 Denver Nuggets
38. The 2009 Cleveland Cavaliers
11. The 2009 Los Angeles Lakers
90. The 2010 Boston Celtics
52. The 2010 Los Angeles Lakers
32. The 2010 Orlando Magic
4 teams in one year?
2010 Orlando Magic?
What happened here?
2016 has 4 in the top 30.
-
Re: Sansterre's Top 100 Teams of All Time
Originally Posted by SaltyMeatballs
I didn't even notice this at first. What the **** are these teams doing on that list?
I mean the Cavs won 66 games so they definitely deserve to be top 100. I’d probably bump them down a bit from 38 but only 13 teams have ever won more games in the RS.
-
Lol
Re: Sansterre's Top 100 Teams of All Time
Originally Posted by ShawkFactory
I mean the Cavs won 66 games so they definitely deserve to be top 100. I’d probably bump them down a bit from 38 but only 13 teams have ever won more games in the RS.
They won 66 games because they had peak LeBron James back when he went 100% all year long.
-
Re: Sansterre's Top 100 Teams of All Time
Originally Posted by RRR3
They won 66 games because they had peak LeBron James back when he went 100% all year long.
Is that supposed to be an argument against them?
-
Lol
Re: Sansterre's Top 100 Teams of All Time
Originally Posted by ShawkFactory
Is that supposed to be an argument against them?
Kind of. I don't think LeBron by himself makes a team all-time great, even 2009 LeBron. You rely that much one player on both ends, it's a recipe for disaster. Also can't be depending on Mo Williams to be a championship number two.
-
NBA lottery pick
Re: Sansterre's Top 100 Teams of All Time
The Cavs lost to the Magic in 2009 because of terrible defense. Their offense with Mo Williams was fine.
-
Lol
Re: Sansterre's Top 100 Teams of All Time
Originally Posted by dankok8
The Cavs lost to the Magic in 2009 because of terrible defense. Their offense with Mo Williams was fine.
Mo Williams averaged 18.3 PPG on 50.5 TS% in that series. Truly spectacular stuff from a second option.
-
NBA lottery pick
Re: Sansterre's Top 100 Teams of All Time
Originally Posted by RRR3
Mo Williams averaged 18.3 PPG on 50.5 TS% in that series. Truly spectacular stuff from a second option.
The Cavs offense was +8.7 rORtg in that series which is excellent. They lost because their defense was +4.1 rDRtg which is really terrible.
-
Lol
Re: Sansterre's Top 100 Teams of All Time
Originally Posted by dankok8
The Cavs offense was +8.7 rORtg in that series which is excellent. They lost because their defense was +4.1 rDRtg which is really terrible.
LeBron averaged almost 40 PPG on elite efficiency, I would hope their offense was good. Point is Mo shit himself.
-
NBA lottery pick
Re: Sansterre's Top 100 Teams of All Time
Originally Posted by RRR3
LeBron averaged almost 40 PPG on elite efficiency, I would hope their offense was good. Point is Mo shit himself.
Again...
Their offense was excellent. They lost because their defense let them down big time.
-
Decent college freshman
Re: Sansterre's Top 100 Teams of All Time
Originally Posted by RRR3
How are the 13 Spurs ahead of a team they lost to?
Cause advanced stats are the only thing that matters...duh. All of realgm knows that
-
... on a leash
Re: Sansterre's Top 100 Teams of All Time
Originally Posted by iamgine
What's going on in 2009 and 2010?
92. The 2009 Orlando Magic
65. The 2009 Denver Nuggets
38. The 2009 Cleveland Cavaliers
11. The 2009 Los Angeles Lakers
90. The 2010 Boston Celtics
52. The 2010 Los Angeles Lakers
32. The 2010 Orlando Magic
4 teams in one year?
2010 Orlando Magic?
What happened here?
thats hilarious
league was piss poor at the time, prob inflated their numbers
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|