Can the GOAT be not as good at winning as many other guys?

[3ba11]

The way Lebron fans downplay Jordan's superior win rates is to say "small sample size", but the sample size argument doesn't work when we include the superior win rates of Duncan, Curry, Kobe, Bird, or Magic, which means the only answer for Lebron's weaker win rates is inferiority - that's the reason he doesn't win as much and needs way more help and has more bad losses than any top 10 candidate

[John8204]

The way Lebron fans downplay Jordan's superior win rates is to say "small sample size", but the sample size argument doesn't work when we include the superior win rates of Duncan, Curry, Kobe, Bird, or Magic, which means the only answer for Lebron's weaker win rates is inferiority - that's the reason he doesn't win as much and needs way more help and has more bad losses than any top 10 candidate

Jordan.....Jordan.....Jordan.....

wasn't that the dude that couldn't beat Larry in the playoffs....that Jordan right.

anyways let's play 3ball out

[Full Court]

The answer is no. Which is why Lebron has been out of the running for GOAT since 2011.

[1987_Lakers]

Banned.

[Phoenix]

See ya on Friday OP.

[StrongLurk]

Bron has FOUR FMVPs...second most all time. Only MJ was better at "winning" in the three-point era.

[Duffy Pratt]

Bron has FOUR FMVPs...second most all time. Only MJ was better at "winning" in the three-point era.

You can win without getting FMVP, which is often awarded to the wrong guy. Then there are: Horry, Kareem, Pippen, Cooper, Magic, Rodman, Harper, Kerr, Kobe, Fisher, and Duncan — all of whom were better at winning in the 3-pt era.