Why do you think the CIA publish random books?

[ArbitraryWater]

They publish pdfs for some books, such as The Secret Teachings of All Ages, Bloodlines of the Illuminati, etc. usually books in the conspiratorial, esoteric, spiritual, etc. field. even quite unknown ones that were somewhat censored (Bloodlines of the Illumati being one).


Bloodlines of the Illuminati even directly names the CIA negatively and Ive just browsed through it, Im sure many of the other books theyve published do too.




I dont think many people read these pdfs though. And its not like theyre being advertised. So youd only read these if already searching / interested.

[SATAN]

Maybe they host it to see how many nutjobs, "eccentric" or otherwise generally curious people are out there.

I've read The Secret Teachings of All Ages. Didn't turn into a lizard.

[ArbitraryWater]

Maybe they host it to see how many nutjobs, "eccentric" or otherwise generally curious people are out there.

I've read The Secret Teachings of All Ages. Didn't turn into a lizard.

what?

Impressive that you did though, congrats.

[Nanners]

For the same reason the CIA employs both Tucker Carlson and Anderson Cooper. You cant really control a narrative if you are only providing one side of the story.

[ArbitraryWater]

For the same reason the CIA employs both Tucker Carlson and Anderson Cooper. You cant really control a narrative if you are only providing one side of the story.

Any source?

Tucker had his home raided by Fox btw


Seems to me if you provide stories from both sides it makes controlling the narrative much harder

[Charlie Sheen]

Any source?

Tucker had his home raided by Fox btw


Seems to me if you provide stories from both sides it makes controlling the narrative much harder

There is an expression in English.... two sides of the same coin
Both sides take turns shutting down proposals and being the bad guy. Leaving the public with nothing in the end.

[ArbitraryWater]

There is an expression in English.... two sides of the same coin
Both sides take turns shutting down proposals and being the bad guy. Leaving the public with nothing in the end.

Yeah but it doesnt really seem that way does it? Media is as one way as it gets. Surey they wouldnt be that worried and scheming if it was two sides of the same coin.

There are definitely interests and orders which one party lends to reserving more than the other.

[Charlie Sheen]

Yeah but it doesnt really seem that way does it? Media is as one way as it gets. Surey they wouldnt be that worried and scheming if it was two sides of the same coin.

There are definitely interests and orders which one party lends to reserving more than the other.

Look at Lakers Legend poster for example...

He thinks he is winning because of the illusion that he chose good over bad to distract him from the reality that he is being robbed blind from both sides by shit like this

https://www.businessinsider.com/cong...trading-2021-9

[Nanners]

Any source?

Tucker had his home raided by Fox btw


Seems to me if you provide stories from both sides it makes controlling the narrative much harder

https://theweek.com/speedreads/68996...tried-join-cia

After college Tucker tried to join the CIA and was supposedly rejected... then he immediately decided to pursue a career in journalism and went on to hold jobs with CNN, MSNBC, and FOX... dude has operation mockingbird written all over him.

How on earth does providing stories from both sides make it harder to control the narrative?

[ArbitraryWater]

https://theweek.com/speedreads/68996...tried-join-cia

After college Tucker tried to join the CIA and was supposedly rejected... then he immediately decided to pursue a career in journalism and went on to hold jobs with CNN, MSNBC, and FOX... dude has operation mockingbird written all over him.

How on earth does providing stories from both sides make it harder to control the narrative?

How exacty does having 2 narratives make people easier to control than having 1?

Plus it wouldnt even be necessary to provide a second narrative, from the other side.

It would occur anyway.

The dominant narrative is obviously the left / progressive one.

The opposition to that would occur anyway, "providing" it or not.

We learn in biology that there are two types of organism, regulators and conformists.

At it's basis, all things can be divided into two categories.

[SATAN]