-
09-13-2024, 01:48 PM
#316
Lol
Re: debate
Originally Posted by Hey Yo
You're allegedly not for either side so why give a fukk what either side has to say? Why should we care about what you think of someone's political opinions that don't involve you and your stance?
Yeah, I'm not sure how you think being against racism is picking sides in the election. Are you admitting you think racism is a partisan issue?
-
09-13-2024, 01:52 PM
#317
NBA Legend
Re: debate
Zens last post had nothing to do with racism.
-
09-13-2024, 01:54 PM
#318
Lol
Re: debate
Originally Posted by Hey Yo
Zens last post had nothing to do with racism.
-
09-13-2024, 01:57 PM
#319
NBA Legend
Re: debate
Originally Posted by Bill Gates
Not only does Kamala have the momentum now. But on Monday the Fed is expected to announce the lowering of interest rates. Which will in turn send an already high stock market to brand new highs. Jobs report just came in fresh. Mortgage rates were just lowered 6.2% on a 30 year, down from 7.2% a year ago.
And the big one, the inflation rate just fell to 2.5%, we are officially at pre-covid inflation and the soft landing happened.
We two more months of a soaring economy for the population to absorb which will feel like a lifetime to voters.
History would say otherwise. The market historically has gone down after the Fed starts lowering rates after a raising cycle.
The end of the year is generally bullish though.
-
09-13-2024, 01:59 PM
#320
Whap'em
Re: debate
Originally Posted by RRR3
ZenMaster is stupid AND full of shit, though.
The lazy library clerk drug dealer calling others stupid is ironic.
-
09-13-2024, 02:01 PM
#321
Lol
Re: debate
Originally Posted by ZenMaster
The lazy library clerk drug dealer calling others stupid is ironic.
So wait a person with two jobs is lazy? That's what you're going with? And yeah, you're stupid, you've been getting your ass handed to you by Tontoz for pages now. You're too stupid to realize he's beating you, too.
-
09-13-2024, 02:24 PM
#322
NBA Legend
Re: debate
LOL @ needing 2 jobs. Maybe you should go to Springfield and work 14hrs under 1 roof. You'd have to wear a giant hair net though so it wouldn't get caught in the machinery.
-
09-13-2024, 02:26 PM
#323
Lol
Re: debate
Originally Posted by Hey Yo
LOL @ needing 2 jobs. Maybe you should go to Springfield and work 14hrs under 1 roof. You'd have to wear a giant hair net though so it wouldn't get caught in the machinery.
We can't all be billionaires like you.
-
09-13-2024, 02:32 PM
#324
Whap'em
Re: debate
Originally Posted by RRR3
So wait a person with two jobs is lazy? That's what you're going with? And yeah, you're stupid, you've been getting your ass handed to you by Tontoz for pages now. You're too stupid to realize he's beating you, too.
Lol yeah not wanting to be a library clerk no more and trying to get out of it by being an end of chain drug dealer, without any knowledge of weed and only selling a few dime bags to locals in your local area, is what I'd consider lazy as hell.
-
09-13-2024, 02:55 PM
#325
Made that high school varsity squad
Re: debate
Originally Posted by tontoz
History would say otherwise. The market historically has gone down after the Fed starts lowering rates after a raising cycle.
The end of the year is generally bullish though.
That is because rate lowering is typically synonymous with recession. It's done to spark borrowing and stimulate the economy.
Currently every time Powell even hints at lowering rates it sends the stock market flying. And every time he says "not yet" the stock market jolts down in the red.
All that said, perhaps the market has now already priced in a .25% drop. But if Powell says they are lowering .50% ? Watch out.
-
09-14-2024, 07:23 PM
#326
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: debate
after trump won the debate - he got OPEC to drop prices , and we are now buying it for $2.86.
Well done sucker upper ..
-
09-21-2024, 01:13 PM
#327
Please clap.
Re: debate
Open challenge to Trump for a rematch.
He should only do it if he's going to (can?) prepare seriously. If he's just going to get fussed at for another two hours and then complain about the moderators he may as well not bother.
-
09-21-2024, 01:21 PM
#328
NBA rookie of the year
Re: debate
Originally Posted by Real Men Wear Green
Open challenge to Trump for a rematch.
He should only do it if he's going to (can?) prepare seriously. If he's just going to get fussed at for another two hours and then complain about the moderators he may as well not bother.
it should be on fox. not because they'll go easy on trump, but for the simple fact that the last one was on a liberal network. it's only fair, isn't it?
-
09-21-2024, 02:35 PM
#329
Good college starter
Re: debate
It's a very well played move by Kamala, get that debate jolt right before election.
If he declines he's a coward. If he accepts she will bait him to death and it will be a repeat of the last debate.
She can harp on what the abortion ban is doing to women knowing that vast majority of women are pro-choice.
-
09-21-2024, 02:42 PM
#330
Please clap.
Re: debate
Originally Posted by diamenz
it should be on fox. not because they'll go easy on trump, but for the simple fact that the last one was on a liberal network. it's only fair, isn't it?
That's false equivalency. FOX had to give Dominion voting systems 787 million dollars as a settlement for their role in promoting Trump's election lies. They aren't just biased they are deceitful.
The one positive to Harris doing a debate moderated by FOX would be that if she won the excuses made last time would go out the window. But the people making those excuses are never going to give Harris credit or admit Trump's flaws no matter what happens so what's the point? Harris won last time and seems to have a little lead right now. She shouldn't subject herself to that kind of adversity unless her campaign has inside info where they're sure that Trump's mental issues are on par with Biden's. I would expect FOX moderators to go after her economic campaign promises (really not plans) in a way that Trump would be doing if he could be bothered to prepare. It would be a better discourse for the american people if she was challenged on these subjects but of course Trump is no better in this regard as he also says random crap that he'll do that makes no sense in regards to the economy (he doesn't seem to know how tariffs work and has a history of huge spending while slashing taxes to create massive deficits). The moderators would point out her crap but leave attacking Trump's crap to her. She is much better at retaining info so I think she could do it but for her the CNN moderators are clearly much better so why take the chance that one of the moderators makes her stumble? You don't give"fair" consideration to the guy that tried to steal the election the last time he lost and will try to steal it again this time if he loses as well.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|