Would a team with 10 Steph Curries be a strong contender?

[Axe]

They would be turning any decent big into Prime Shaq because of the obvious lack of defense and size..

He would feast on them. Literally.

[Full Court]

He would feast on them. Literally.

And still get outscored.


Also, Axey doesn't know what the world "literally" means. Decent bigs would, in fact, NOT literally feast on Steph Curry. I guess there's a reason why he got so many votes for dumbest poster in ISH history.

[Axe]

There are quick, athletic wings that can challenge him with length. No one is going to shit him down but with the terrible post defense his side would be playing that level of defensive success wouldn't be required. Just keep his side under 160.

True. Unfortunately, the gay retard above me can't comprehend because he's still fixated on me like an obsessed lunatic btw.

[Full Court]

True. Unfortunately, the gay retard above me can't comprehend because he's still fixated on me like an obsessed lunatic btw.

^LITERALLY having a bitch fit over a thread about Steph Curry. You can't make this stuff up.

[Axe]

So i guess prime shaq is only a decent big and that stephen curry will be able to stop him from dominating in the low post, at least according to the 2023 dumbest poster in ish. Got it.

[Full Court]

So i guess prime shaq is only a decent big and that stephen curry will be able to stop him from dominating in the low post, at least according to the 2023 dumbest poster in ish. Got it.

3 points are worth more than 2. And Shaq can't shoot free throws. I guess you never heard of hack-a-Shaq.

I know this is difficult for someone of your diminutive intellect to grasp.

[Axe]

^^This braindead mongoloid really thinks that curry can shoot his threes phenomenally most of time when in the postseason, defenses are generally much tighter. Fyfi there's a reason why his fg% would drop and his go-ahead shots suck come playoff time, along with why it took him six trips to the finals just to win his very first finals mvp award. A playoff team full of him won't mitigate those unless he's more naturally athletic.

[Full Court]

^^This braindead mongoloid really thinks that curry can shoot his threes phenomenally most of time when in the postseason, defenses are generally much tighter. Fyfi there's a reason why his fg% would drop and his go-ahead shots suck come playoff time, along with why it took him six trips to the finals just to win his very first finals mvp award. A playoff team full of him won't mitigate those unless he's more naturally athletic.

I'm always astounded by his ability to think. Maybe he's never actually watched the playoffs and doesn't realize that those "postseason defenses" double team Curry all the time. So of course he has no clue that every time that happens it leaves a Curry open.

"Bu-bu-bu-bu-but a team full of Currys couldn't possibly win....because Curry bad, and my Lebron good! "

Yeah, a team full of ten clones of the best player of his generation would sure suck.

What an idiot.

[Axe]

Lmao. The double-teams are already obvious the moment i mentioned about the postseason. But what about when those threes don't hit that much? Good luck letting the other gerbils grab the boards off those misses against taller, athletic guys. As usual, jackass casual turns this shit into a purely-scoring affair by not putting some emphasis on defense, by not thinking that relying solely on threes and missing a lot of them can have grave consequences for the team. What a clueless pos. Oh and btw, nice try bringing up lebron itt. You just can't help but prove that derangement syndrome is indeed really true and powerful, after all.

[ArbitraryWater]

Its interesting because the retort is theyd give up a 2 every time, but theyre making 3s at a rate good enough to beat that out, probably.

I mean 5 Currys prob get an open look almost every trip.


So theyd prob win the chip.

[sdot_thadon]

As long as those Steph Curries aren't playing for charity.

[Full Court]

Its interesting because the retort is theyd give up a 2 every time, but theyre making 3s at a rate good enough to beat that out, probably.

I mean 5 Currys prob get an open look almost every trip.


So theyd prob win the chip.

This guy gets it.

Lmao. The double-teams are already obvious the moment i mentioned about the postseason. But what about when those threes don't hit that much? Good luck letting the other gerbils grab the boards off those misses against taller, athletic guys. As usual, jackass casual turns this shit into a purely-scoring affair by not putting some emphasis on defense, by not thinking that relying solely on threes and missing a lot of them can have grave consequences for the team. What a clueless pos. Oh and btw, nice try bringing up lebron itt. You just can't help but prove that derangement syndrome is indeed really true and powerful, after all.

This addlepated idiot does not get it.

He's probably in a bitch fit due to insecurity about Curry having double the number of scoring titles as the love of his life does. Multiple scoring titles and an FMVP.....and he thinks putting 10 of them on a team wouldn't be a title contender. You can't make this up.

[meat]

True. Unfortunately, the gay retard above me can't comprehend because he's still fixated on me like an obsessed lunatic btw.

You did misuse the word. Stephen Curry is probably not going to eat people. I can't say for sure though. Don't trust that babyface.

[Axe]

You did misuse the word. Stephen Curry is probably not going to eat people. I can't say for sure though. Don't trust that babyface.

Who?

[Full Court]

You did misuse the word. Stephen Curry is probably not going to eat people. I can't say for sure though. Don't trust that babyface.

Axe thinks NBA players are cannibals.

A proper use of the word would be along the lines of the following:

"Axe literally feasts on dozens of Hot Pockets."