Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 50
  1. #16
    Intelligent fan
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Land of 14 NBA Championships
    Posts
    4,873

    Default

    Why not move the team? The fans cheer for the opposing team and they have to support only jump shooters and players with huge egos.

  2. #17
    #hellobrooklyn ZHAKIDD532's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    NJ/NY
    Posts
    2,917

    Default

    I think that the Hornets need to stay in NO, so do the Saints. Chris Paul and Reggie Bush can put help put that city back together...

  3. #18
    Put yr guns up
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    HoustoN
    Posts
    2,973

    Default

    This is bull****. Pisses me off so much that Stern allows teams to hold taxpayers hostage. Build your own damn stadium, and if you can't afford it, don't buy an NBA franchise. Why can't that be how things work?
    Agreed, it's terrible.

  4. #19
    #hellobrooklyn ZHAKIDD532's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    NJ/NY
    Posts
    2,917

    Default

    ^definetly

  5. #20
    Made that high school varsity squad
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles area
    Posts
    738

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rab
    The city isn't doing much to support their stay though. The fans yes, but not the city officials. Isn't this whole mess about a new arena, or renavating the Key Arena or something?
    I think it had more to do with the lease situation between the city of Seattle (which owns KeyArena) and the Supersonics. Starbucks Schultz was crying poor in saying that the Sonics are losing money on the lease on KeyArena. I think since the city and the state of Washington, who already spent about a billion dollars building new stadiums for the Mariners and Seahawks, didn't want to spend anymore money for an arena that was just renovated 12 years ago and still looks in fine shape. But then again, it is the oldest arena in the NBA (opened in 1962) and eventually they might have to build a new facility anyway.

    It would be a shame if the Sonics did move, they were the team that made Seattle a major professional sports city--they were the first franchise there, a team that gave Seattle its first and only major league sports championship, and have a near 40-year history of good basketball teams and players.

  6. #21
    Bucks fan
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    3,397

    Default

    The answer that would end this problem forever, is to make it illegal for governments to award free stadiums to teams. All of the sudden, teams would have to build their own stadiums, and cut player salaries to come up with the money. If you need a new stadium with better revenue generating capabilities, you build it.

  7. #22
    Up in the Rafters Young HkM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    669

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rab
    The city isn't doing much to support their stay though. The fans yes, but not the city officials. Isn't this whole mess about a new arena, or renavating the Key Arena or something?
    It pretty much nobody but the Sonics and some others want to build the stadium, very few want to pay any more taxes since we have payed for Safeco (Mariners), Qwest Field (Seahawks), and we're currently paying a lot of money for the construction on a lightrail that travels all through the city. The city of Bellevue wants to build a stadium for the Sonics and that'd be good if they can take care of the Sonics once the lease it up, but we'll see what happens.

  8. #23
    Up in the Rafters Young HkM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    669

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ShawnieMac06
    I think it had more to do with the lease situation between the city of Seattle (which owns KeyArena) and the Supersonics. Starbucks Schultz was crying poor in saying that the Sonics are losing money on the lease on KeyArena. I think since the city and the state of Washington, who already spent about a billion dollars building new stadiums for the Mariners and Seahawks, didn't want to spend anymore money for an arena that was just renovated 12 years ago and still looks in fine shape. But then again, it is the oldest arena in the NBA (opened in 1962) and eventually they might have to build a new facility anyway.

    It would be a shame if the Sonics did move, they were the team that made Seattle a major professional sports city--they were the first franchise there, a team that gave Seattle its first and only major league sports championship, and have a near 40-year history of good basketball teams and players.
    It's not from '62. In that lot used to be the Coliseum, but they tore it down and started from scratch. The Keyarena was opened in like '95. Just to clarify.

  9. #24
    Made that high school varsity squad
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles area
    Posts
    738

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Young HkM
    It's not from '62. In that lot used to be the Coliseum, but they tore it down and started from scratch. The Keyarena was opened in like '95. Just to clarify.
    Maybe so, but the exterior from the original Coliseum is still the same...all they did was gutted the inside and built a completely new facility, that's what I meant.

  10. #25
    Good college starter Noob Saibot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Netherrealm
    Posts
    2,986

    Default

    Have the Supersonics ever won a championship in Seattle? Seattle just has buzzard luck i guess. Should've listened to commander Stern and built a new arena in Bellevue.

    Oklahoma Sonics, man that don't sound right. :confused:

  11. #26
    Made that high school varsity squad
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles area
    Posts
    738

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Noob Saibot
    Have the Supersonics ever won a championship in Seattle? Seattle just has buzzard luck i guess. Should've listened to commander Stern and built a new arena in Bellevue.

    Oklahoma Sonics, man that don't sound right. :confused:
    They won a title in 1979 (beat Washington), but lost in '78 (to Washington) and '96 (to Chicago)

  12. #27
    Jared Dudley's #1 Fan Rab's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    The Purple Palace
    Posts
    2,485

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Young HkM
    It pretty much nobody but the Sonics and some others want to build the stadium, very few want to pay any more taxes since we have payed for Safeco (Mariners), Qwest Field (Seahawks), and we're currently paying a lot of money for the construction on a lightrail that travels all through the city. The city of Bellevue wants to build a stadium for the Sonics and that'd be good if they can take care of the Sonics once the lease it up, but we'll see what happens.
    Cool, thanks for the info.

  13. #28
    Fire Dwane Casey
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,808

    Default

    good thing the Raptors didn't move.

    But if the fans want the Sonics to stay in Seattle, every game next year better be sold out.

  14. #29
    Missing Since 2009 kwajo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    On the water
    Posts
    5,522

    Default

    damn, I was really pulling for Vancouver to regain a team

  15. #30
    Administrator insidehoops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    17,432

    Default

    Bump

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •