Two Israeli embassy staffers killed by a Pro-Palestian

[Baller234]

No one sane thinks killing random people is good dawg.

Sure you can argue killing is wrong regardless and I think there's a decent argument for that for sure, but you can at least see the reasoning Mangione had.

[ShawkFactory]

Killing is wrong regardless =/= Killing random people.

The first instance encompasses any killing, just or not.

There is no contradiction there.

[Baller234]

Killing is wrong regardless =/= Killing random people.

The first instance encompasses any killing, just or not.

There is no contradiction there.

Hey Einstein, you can't say "killing is wrong" and then in your next breath say "well I can definitely see his reasoning...". If murdering a person is wrong then there is no justification to be had.

You guys are straight up sociopaths.

[Patrick Chewing]

Hey Einstein, you can't say "killing is wrong" and then in your next breath say "well I can definitely see his reasoning...". If murdering a person is wrong then there is no justification to be had.

You guys are straight up sociopaths.

Exactly. I've never seen so many people with the same belief system out there under one roof apparently. It's a complete disconnect from reality and from morality. It's scary.

[ShawkFactory]

Hey Einstein, you can't say "killing is wrong" and then in your next breath say "well I can definitely see his reasoning...". If murdering a person is wrong then there is no justification to be had.

You guys are straight up sociopaths.

I'm not giving a personal opinion on the matter. I'm just saying there is no contradiction with what he said is all.

A rape victim, or the father of a rape victim, killing the rapist would still encompass "killing". But you could probably see the reasoning, no? Even if it's still wrong.

Killing randos is unequivocal and is a completely different level of evil.

[Baller234]

I'm not giving a personal opinion on the matter. I'm just saying there is no contradiction with what he said is all.

A rape victim, or the father of a rape victim, killing the rapist would still encompass "killing". But you could probably see the reasoning, no? Even if it's still wrong.

Killing randos is unequivocal and is a completely different level of evil.

Yes but when it comes to the father of a rape victim, I can at least cut that person some slack.

That's not the same as murdering an insurance CEO because you personally believe him to be a bad person. If that's the case where do you draw the line? Is the CEO of McDonalds a bad person? How many countless deaths are the result of eating too many double cheeseburgers?

Was the CEO guy a saint? Probably not. Did he deserve to be executed in the street? Definitely not. Once you cross that line you could start justifying the murder of practically anyone you feel is "indirectly" responsible for something bad. That's not good.

Not to mention there's a good chance this Luigi character was a hired gun and not some enraged victim, so the people defending him are even more out of bounds.

[John8204]

Tell that to the millions of woke lefties around the world who idolize Luigi.

45,000 people die because of denied coverage every year. Which means in a generation 1,000,000 people die because of private equity interests in our health care system. The current Gaza death total is 53,000 which means more people died because of insurance bureaucracy than died in the Gaza/Israel war.

Because the right wing in this country is going after the people on insurance instead of the LLC's that defraud the system a million people are going to lose coverage so that number is going to go up.

Easy access to firearms, combined with a lack of mental health screenings, and an Insurance companies that are buoyed by private equity means you and everyone you love...so basically just you are vulnerable to getting shot like a dog in the street because of this.

[ShawkFactory]

Yes but when it comes to the father of a rape victim, I can at least cut that person some slack.

That's not the same as murdering an insurance CEO because you personally believe him to be a bad person. If that's the case where do you draw the line? Is the CEO of McDonalds a bad person? How many countless deaths are the result of eating too many double cheeseburgers?

Was the CEO guy a saint? Probably not. Did he deserve to be executed in the street? Definitely not. Once you cross that line you could start justifying the murder of practically anyone you feel is "indirectly" responsible for something bad. That's not good.

Not to mention there's a good chance this Luigi character was a hired gun and not some enraged victim, so the people defending him are even more out of bounds.

Well therein lies the difference in your thinking. You don't believe or understand the UHC CEO's extreme negative impact. No, it's not the same as the CEO of a company that has people voluntarily decide to eat too much of their product. Denying healthcare coverage bankrupts people, and often even worse. And people insured have no control over this.

But that is all beside the point anyway, in that none of these scenarios deal with the murdering of random innocent people. Which is what happened in the case of this thread and is an incredibly horrible thing to do.

[ArbitraryWater]

If 2 upsets fatso OP, I have bad news for him.

[MrFonzworth]

This is clearly a false flag

[Baller234]

45,000 people die because of denied coverage every year. Which means in a generation 1,000,000 people die because of private equity interests in our health care system. The current Gaza death total is 53,000 which means more people died because of insurance bureaucracy than died in the Gaza/Israel war.

Because the right wing in this country is going after the people on insurance instead of the LLC's that defraud the system a million people are going to lose coverage so that number is going to go up.

Easy access to firearms, combined with a lack of mental health screenings, and an Insurance companies that are buoyed by private equity means you and everyone you love...so basically just you are vulnerable to getting shot like a dog in the street because of this.

Dude you have no idea why insurance companies deny coverage to certain people. You don't know the specifics, you don't know the reasoning. I highly doubt you did any serious research on the matter yourself. You just hear "denied coverage" and go into an emotional frenzy.

Yea, lets blame the right wing for the state of health insurance. Lol the nerve for you to say that when lefties supported Obamacare a.k.a. lets monopolize insurance at the government level and charge people a penalty tax for not buying our expensive coverage.

[Patrick Chewing]

Heil Hitler!

Fixed

[Baller234]

Well therein lies the difference in your thinking. You don't believe or understand the UHC CEO's extreme negative impact. No, it's not the same as the CEO of a company that has people voluntarily decide to eat too much of their product. Denying healthcare coverage bankrupts people, and often even worse. And people insured have no control over this.

But that is all beside the point anyway, in that none of these scenarios deal with the murdering of random innocent people. Which is what happened in the case of this thread and is an incredibly horrible thing to do.

You think human beings are entitled to low cost health insurance?

That's a very interesting stance to take in the same post where you discuss people eating McDonald's everyday.

[ShawkFactory]

You think human beings are entitled to low cost health insurance?

That's a very interesting stance to take in the same post where you discuss people eating McDonald's everyday.

Where did I say that?

I know you didn't respond to me regarding this, but it kinda seems like you don't know how healthcare insurance actually works.

[Baller234]

Where did I say that?

I know you didn't respond to me regarding this, but it kinda seems like you don't know how healthcare insurance actually works.

I'm sure there are cases of insurance companies trying to weasel out of having to cover certain expenses.

That doesn't mean you have a right to shoot the CEO in the back of the head.