100 year old Nancy Pelosi won't seek re-election

[Hey Yo]

Smart move by Skeletor... she lost her mind awhile ago. Her meltdowns were easily triggered as of late.

Good riddance to that bitch.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/06/polit...ess-retirement

[TheMan]

Smart move by Skeletor... she lost her mind awhile ago. Her meltdowns were easily triggered as of late.

Good riddance to that bitch.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/06/polit...ess-retirement

For once we agree on something

[Hey Yo]

This bitch did some serious shady inside dealings. Regardless who the person is, you'd think that these constant positive returns would be looked into.

____________

Nancy Pelosi made $130M in stock profits during Congress career — a return of 16,930%

Before first taking Congressional office in 1987, the then-47-year-old freshman and her hubby, venture capitalist Paul Pelosi, reported between $610,000 and $785,000 in stocks in their portfolio, according to a copy of her “hand delivered” 1987 financial disclosure form.

They held a dozen stocks, including CitiBank, and in many companies no longer publicly traded.

That portfolio has soared to $133.7 million today, according to the latest estimates from Quiver Quantitative.

That represents an eye-watering profit of 16,930% — compared to 2,300% for the Dow Jones over those years.

Even with the power of compound interest, the windfall represents a staggering 14.5% average annual return — beating out the S&P 500, NASDAQ and Dow Jones performances over those years, around 7% to 9%.

Last year, their investment portfolio pulled in an estimated 54% return, more than double the S&P 500’s 25% gain — and beating every large hedge fund, according to numbers in Bloomberg’s end-of-year tally.

The Pelosis are worth an estimated $280 million today – compared to around $3 million when the Golden State lawmaker joined Congress.

https://nypost.com/2025/11/08/us-new...ofit-of-16930/

[Chick Stern]

This bitch did some serious shady inside dealings. Regardless who the person is, you'd think that these constant positive returns would be looked into.

____________

Nancy Pelosi made $130M in stock profits during Congress career — a return of 16,930%

Before first taking Congressional office in 1987, the then-47-year-old freshman and her hubby, venture capitalist Paul Pelosi, reported between $610,000 and $785,000 in stocks in their portfolio, according to a copy of her “hand delivered” 1987 financial disclosure form.

They held a dozen stocks, including CitiBank, and in many companies no longer publicly traded.

That portfolio has soared to $133.7 million today, according to the latest estimates from Quiver Quantitative.

That represents an eye-watering profit of 16,930% — compared to 2,300% for the Dow Jones over those years.

Even with the power of compound interest, the windfall represents a staggering 14.5% average annual return — beating out the S&P 500, NASDAQ and Dow Jones performances over those years, around 7% to 9%.

Last year, their investment portfolio pulled in an estimated 54% return, more than double the S&P 500’s 25% gain — and beating every large hedge fund, according to numbers in Bloomberg’s end-of-year tally.

The Pelosis are worth an estimated $280 million today – compared to around $3 million when the Golden State lawmaker joined Congress.

https://nypost.com/2025/11/08/us-new...ofit-of-16930/

Can you imagine what an absolute shiite businessman you would have to be to have SIX bankruptcies when others are seeing returns like this?

[Real Men Wear Green]

Can you imagine what an absolute shiite businessman you would have to be to have SIX bankruptcies when others are seeing returns like this?

I'm just glad that someone ls finally pointing out all the grift going down in Washington. I mean, a powerful elected official abusing his office to line his own pockets would just be absolutely terrible.

[Lakers Legend#32]

Someone tell MAGAS that Pelosi has not been relevant for the last few years.

[bladefd]

I'm just glad that someone ls finally pointing out all the grift going down in Washington. I mean, a powerful elected official abusing his office to line his own pockets would just be absolutely terrible.

Absolutely because it would make them the swamp and absolute corrupt jackass. Especially if foreigners were able to give tens of billions into a fund, say a cryptocoin, with zero accountability of where that money comes from. Or ran their own organization that defrauds people. Boy, if such a person existed, wouldn't that person be considered a con-artist? It's fortune that such a person doesn't exist in our government.