New Epstein emails released

[Bill Gates]

No you liar, I'm asking you to provide the full context of the email. I want to know what those implications really mean.

You said it was a smoking gun, okay, so give me the background on this and tell me what sets the stage for this exchange. I want to know.

I just did that -

Epstein is telling Ghislaine Maxwell that Trump "has never been mentioned" despite being with "VICTIM" spending hours with him. He wants Maxwell to realize that Trump (the dog that hasn't barked) has essentially gone into hiding and no one is aware of his guilty activity. She replies to Epstein saying "I have been thinking about that".


You just aren't in acceptance of it

[Baller234]

I just did that -

Epstein is telling Ghislaine Maxwell that Trump "has never been mentioned" despite being with "VICTIM" spending hours with him. He wants Maxwell to realize that Trump (the dog that hasn't barked) has essentially gone into hiding and no one is aware of his guilty activity. She replies to Epstein saying "I have been thinking about that".

Mentioned in what? By who? What is Epstein referring to?

[warriorfan]

2 more weeks!

[Bill Gates]

Mentioned in what? By who? What is Epstein referring to?

"police chief. etc."

[Baller234]

"police chief. etc."

So was the police chief there with Trump? Or was the police chief being interrogated and is just refusing to mention Trump?

Why are you acting like a 13 year old girl. Why can't you just lay out the context for their conversation.

[Bill Gates]

So was the police chief there with Trump? Or was the police chief being interrogated and is just refusing to mention Trump?

Why are you acting like the 13 year old girl. Why can't you just lay out the context for their conversation.

I did lay out the context and you are the one acting like a frustrated little girl. It's an email, it doesn't state where the police chief etc literally were. And that part doesn't matter.

[Bill Gates]

How about you tell me what you believe the context of the email is? Since you won't accept mine.

[Real Men Wear Green]

"police chief. etc." in the email

I can see you're really wanting it all to mean something else. But what it means is that Trump is guilty. You should try to come to terms with that.

Will be weird watching him do this for the next three years. Like a train wreck at the speed of grass growth.

[Bill Gates]

Will be weird watching him do this for the next three years. Like a train wreck at the speed of grass growth.

I suppose it is a given that some of MAGA will be in perma-denial. Could be video footage of Trump with a minor and they will declare it is fake AI footage or something.

[Baller234]

I did lay out the context and you are the one acting like a frustrated little girl. It's an email, it doesn't state where the police chief etc literally were. And that part doesn't matter.

It doesn't matter?

You're telling me this exchange is a smoking gun but you can't even tell me what's being communicated?

Almost every sentence in the email is vague and indirect. It's like they're speaking in code. What does 75% there mean? Trump hasn't been mentioned in what? By who? Why is he the dog that hasn't barked? Does that mean he's hiding or that he's not snitching? It doesn't even sound like you know.

This is like a social experiment. I'm not saying the email is fake but it might as well be. Even if someone had randomly created a fake email with random code sentences, but inserted the word "Trump", you would just interpret it however you want and jump to your own conclusions anyway. Because even if the email is real it's clear you still have no idea what's actually being communicated.

[Baller234]

How about you tell me what you believe the context of the email is? Since you won't accept mine.

Uh, I have no fukking idea genius. That's why I was asking you.

You purported yourself to be some type of expert.

[Bill Gates]

The "I'm 75% there" line is vague. I'll give you that. But the rest of the email is very straight forward and implies that Trump isn't "barking" because he is guilty of being with "VICTIM" for hours in Epstein's home.

[Baller234]

The "I'm 75% there" line is vague. I'll give you that. But the rest of the email is very straight forward and implies that Trump isn't "barking" because he is guilty of being with "VICTIM" for hours in Epstein's home.

What does "Trump isn't barking" actually supposed to mean? Lay it out in plain terms. Is he protecting someone? Is he hiding? If so, who.. what?

If the email is so straightforward then you should be able to explain this.

[BurningHammer]

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-epstein-thanksgiving/

President Donald Trump's relationship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein continued into his first term in the White House, so much so that Epstein spent Thanksgiving with Trump while the president was in office, according to newly released emails written by the late financier.



Democrats on the House Oversight Committee released a new batch of emails Wednesday obtained from Epstein's estate, followed by the Republican-led panel's release of 20,000 additional documents, and one of those exchanges shows that he claims to have spent Thanksgiving 2017 – Trump's first as president – at his private Mar-a-Lago resort.


Epstein exchanged emails on Thanksgiving morning, Nov. 23, 2017, with Manhattan modeling management guru Faith Kates, who asked where he was spending the holiday.

So they were allegedly friends right until Epstein was arrested?

[Doomsday Dallas]

1. That has nothing to do with anything

We're talking about your world view...

Why is it that obvious conspiracies and corruption only become obvious if it implies Trump is guilty?



Or is this still not a conspiracy?