-
So Lonzo Ball was a bust
Honestly I called this way back in the day. Even in his high school highlights, he didn't blow me away or anything.
He's a decent passer and defender, but his scoring is way too bad for him to be a starter (11ppg career average on 39/35/60 splits).
Lamelo would be really good if he actually had a brain.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: So Lonzo Ball was a bust
Rather have lonzo than beavis
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: So Lonzo Ball was a bust
 Originally Posted by StrongLurk
Honestly I called this way back in the day. Even in his high school highlights, he didn't blow me away or anything.
He's a decent passer and defender, but his scoring is way too bad for him to be a starter (11ppg career average on 39/35/60 splits).
Lamelo would be really good if he actually had a brain.
lamelo is a product of social media, so naturally he will be brainless. it would not surprise me if he uses the words "no cap", breathes through his mouth and is illiterate.
-
Re: So Lonzo Ball was a bust
He's had a bunch of injuries though hasn't he?
I feel like if that didn't happen and he was at his best he'd be a very solid player. Like a taller Rondo type.
-
Re: So Lonzo Ball was a bust
Scared to take it to the rim because of poor FT shooting. So, Rondo-like in that aspect. Maybe things would've developed differently if he had been the 38.1% 3PT on 6.9 3pa/g & 69.7% FT on 1.0 fta/g that he was between 2020-2025 from the beginning.
He led the PAC-12 in TS% (67.3%), 2PT% (73.2% on 4.1 2pa/g), and shot 41.2% 3PT on 5.4 3pa/g and 67.3% FT on 2.7 fta/g (28.6 FTr).
He didn't have to shoot 70% on his 2PT FGs in the NBA, but you'd have hoped he could've leveraged his three-ball to score inside better. Like, 55% with some FTs would've been nice. More like a Giddey or Haliburton. But it seems like his poor start shellshocked him into accepting a lower-stress role of a 3 & D guy.
-
Re: So Lonzo Ball was a bust
So, basically, he ended up being a taller, better three-point shooting Rondo. Clearly an impactful player, but his potential shown in college should've had him become something like a Jason Kidd-lite, but with better three-point shooting. Or Tyrese Haliburton with worse offense but better defense.
-
Re: So Lonzo Ball was a bust
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: So Lonzo Ball was a bust
 Originally Posted by Im Still Ballin
that hook shot is so ugly. i always liked that he could play D though, seemingly becoming a rare thing amongst PGs
-
Re: So Lonzo Ball was a bust
OP knew he'd get serious injuries that would derail his career?
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: So Lonzo Ball was a bust
 Originally Posted by Im Still Ballin
Scared to take it to the rim because of poor FT shooting. So, Rondo-like in that aspect. Maybe things would've developed differently if he had been the 38.1% 3PT on 6.9 3pa/g & 69.7% FT on 1.0 fta/g that he was between 2020-2025 from the beginning.
He led the PAC-12 in TS% (67.3%), 2PT% (73.2% on 4.1 2pa/g), and shot 41.2% 3PT on 5.4 3pa/g and 67.3% FT on 2.7 fta/g (28.6 FTr).
He didn't have to shoot 70% on his 2PT FGs in the NBA, but you'd have hoped he could've leveraged his three-ball to score inside better. Like, 55% with some FTs would've been nice. More like a Giddey or Haliburton. But it seems like his poor start shellshocked him into accepting a lower-stress role of a 3 & D guy.
Couldnt make a lay up like rubio last i saw so might not just be his ft %
-
Re: So Lonzo Ball was a bust
 Originally Posted by Xiao Yao You
Couldnt make a lay up like rubio last i saw so might not just be his ft %
Just checked his drive FG% from 2018-2022, and yeah, it wasn't pretty. Like, 33-35% on 1-2 FGAs/g. Crazy how he went from such a high 2PT% at UCLA to that.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|