Good movie, but it kind of lacked in the entertainment department and it doesn't seem to have much rewatchability to it. B
A movie that is inspired by the story of Australian Corey Delaney with a bit of Superbad mixed in. 3 high schoolers throw a party where things keep escalating until it gets way out of hand. Decent enough for what it is, but don't expect anything all that good. C
I thought the movie was headed in one direction and I would have given it a higher rating if it went that way, but I still thought it was a pretty good movie. I don't want to spoil it, so I'll stop there. B
Just a decent, average comedy that doesn't really deliver too many laughs. C
Last edited by Jackass18 : 12-19-2012 at 09:39 PM.
I'm curious what you rated the first Taken. It matters because I thought it was about a 7. Is Taken 2 about the same?
Maybe id be generous and go 7.5 due to its highlight being a somewhat badass Liam Neeson.
The second one is not the same. The action portions are weak. The acting is just plain bad. The entire story is paper thin and the ending was as bad as it could possibly get. Taken 2 is completely useless in every way. And the only redeeming factor of the first one wasnt there.. Neeson is OLD.. He couldnt even walk throughout the movie, let alone fight. They had to do herky jerky camera cutting to make it seem as if more action was occurring than there actually was. Its readily apparent that Neeson was simply not capable of any physical acting. Plus, he was injured during the shooting of the movie, so that explains even more why he seemed stiff and burdened.
Take 2 is an even worse duplicate of the first one. It really lacked in every possible aspect.