Page 8 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789 LastLast
Results 106 to 120 of 121
  1. #106
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    4,304

    Default Re: Kris Humprhies is staying with Nets on two-year deal valued at $24 million

    Quote Originally Posted by Locked_Up_Tonight
    The Nets will pay >60 million dollars just on the starting unit alone: Deron/Johnson/Wallace/Humphries/Lopez.

    Talk about wasting money.
    Will that lineup even make the playoffs?

  2. #107
    An uglier Lamar Doom boozehound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    23,273

    Default Re: Kris Humprhies is staying with Nets on two-year deal valued at $24 million

    Quote Originally Posted by wang4three
    Ben Wallace will be regarded as one of the best rebounders of all time but the Pistons (pre-Rasheed Wallace days) were one of the worst rebounding teams in the league. Are we going to discredit him as a rebounder too because of it?

    And how much inflating are we really talking about? To use the Ben Wallace example, after Rasheed joined the team, his averages dropped like 2 or 3 rebounds. Which would make Kris a 9-10 rpg player. Not really that bad if you ask me.

    His point production most definitely will go down, but his rebounding should be fine. If I take issue with anything Kris does, it's what he does on offense. He tries too much to do what he's not. But as far as rebounding goes, he's a pretty good one, and as good as anyone not named Kevin Love or Dwight Howard.
    I acknowledge (in a second post on this) that ben wallace's stats are also inflated. it comes with the territory. funny how other nets fans get all butthurt about it when its really just an observation (in which I never singled out hump, but also acknowledged lee and moose).

  3. #108
    NJ Net Fan For Life. wang4three's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    11,773

    Default Re: Kris Humprhies is staying with Nets on two-year deal valued at $24 million

    Quote Originally Posted by LJJ
    They could all easily average 10 rebounds in 35 minutes on those Nets playing next to Shelden Williams.

    Especially when doing barely anything else. They were simply never put in a situation like that. But everyone can see you are just a blind homer.
    No, I think you're just blind. Kris has averaged 10rpg in 27mpg in the just the season prior. Guys you put up, who've been on bad teams and played significant rebounds couldn't put up 10 rebounds in less than 30 minutes. Kwame Brown? Who was he rebounding against when he was on the Lakers and Bobcats? Diop and Chris Mihm? Didn't even break 8.

    Scola is a guy when they were fronting Battier at PF when Yao went down couldn't average 10 rpg. McGee played most of this season with 6'7" Trevor Booker at the 4 and he didn't either.

    And barely anything else? The guy was like our 2nd or 3rd leading scorer for most of the season. If anything, his rebounding numbers went down this season because he was asked to score instead of just rebound.

    You're just awful.

  4. #109
    NJ Net Fan For Life. wang4three's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    11,773

    Default Re: Kris Humprhies is staying with Nets on two-year deal valued at $24 million

    Quote Originally Posted by boozehound
    I acknowledge (in a second post on this) that ben wallace's stats are also inflated. it comes with the territory. funny how other nets fans get all butthurt about it when its really just an observation (in which I never singled out hump, but also acknowledged lee and moose).
    Ok, I did not see the other post. I'm not butthurt, I just don't think people can knock Kris as a rebounder. There's plenty of other things you can criticize him for. Whether it be offensively, personally, or mentally. But as a rebounder? That's the one thing he's legitimately good at.

  5. #110
    An uglier Lamar Doom boozehound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    23,273

    Default Re: Kris Humprhies is staying with Nets on two-year deal valued at $24 million

    Quote Originally Posted by wang4three
    Ok, I did not see the other post. I'm not butthurt, I just don't think people can knock Kris as a rebounder. There's plenty of other things you can criticize him for. Whether it be offensively, personally, or mentally. But as a rebounder? That's the one thing he's legitimately good at.
    no, I think you have been reasonable (as you most always are) in this thread. Kris is a good rebounder, no doubt.

  6. #111
    I Run NY. niko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    25,508

    Default Re: Kris Humprhies is staying with Nets on two-year deal valued at $24 million

    Quote Originally Posted by wang4three
    Ok, I did not see the other post. I'm not butthurt, I just don't think people can knock Kris as a rebounder. There's plenty of other things you can criticize him for. Whether it be offensively, personally, or mentally. But as a rebounder? That's the one thing he's legitimately good at.
    I've seen him twice injure teammates knocking them out of the way. For rebounds. he's give it his all.

  7. #112
    Extra Cheese LJJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    14,526

    Default Re: Kris Humprhies is staying with Nets on two-year deal valued at $24 million

    Quote Originally Posted by wang4three
    No, I think you're just blind. Kris has averaged 10rpg in 27mpg in the just the season prior. Guys you put up, who've been on bad teams and played significant rebounds couldn't put up 10 rebounds in less than 30 minutes. Kwame Brown? Who was he rebounding against when he was on the Lakers and Bobcats? Diop and Chris Mihm? Didn't even break 8.

    Scola is a guy when they were fronting Battier at PF when Yao went down couldn't average 10 rpg. McGee played most of this season with 6'7" Trevor Booker at the 4 and he didn't either.

    And barely anything else? The guy was like our 2nd or 3rd leading scorer for most of the season. If anything, his rebounding numbers went down this season because he was asked to score instead of just rebound.

    You're just awful.
    When Kwame played on the Bobcats that was a solid rebounding team. Same with the Lakers. Give him carte blanche on a horrible rebounding team? He could do it. He is one of the weaker cases on my list, I agree, but I think he could do it. He has the physical tools and rebounding ability.

    Scola? Averaged 9 rebounds per game in 30 minutes on a team with Yao, Artest, Landry. But he can't average 10 on the Nets? GTFO. The reason he doesn't average monster stats is because he is a consummate team player who doesn't play for stats. He is better than Humphries at literally every single thing involving basketball.

    McGee? Doesn't average a double double because he doesn't get to play 35 minutes a game. Would easily do so in those minutes, especially on those Nets. If you think he wouldn't average a double double on the Nets you must be insane.



    You can take all the cases you (wrongly) doubt off my list, and still end up with the 29+ guys you asked for.

  8. #113
    NJ Net Fan For Life. wang4three's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    11,773

    Default Re: Kris Humprhies is staying with Nets on two-year deal valued at $24 million

    Quote Originally Posted by LJJ
    When Kwame played on the Bobcats that was a solid rebounding team. Same with the Lakers.

    Scola? Averaged 9 rebounds per game in 30 minutes on a team with Yao, Artest, Landry. But he can't average 10 on the Nets? GTFO. The reason he doesn't average monster stats is because he is a consummate team player who doesn't play for stats. He is better than Humphries at literally every single thing involving basketball.

    McGee? Doesn't average a double double because he doesn't get to play 35 minutes a game. Would easily do so in those minutes, especially on those Nets. If you think he wouldn't average a double double on the Nets you must be insane.



    You can take all the cases you (wrongly) doubt off my list, and still end up with the 29+ guys you asked for.

    I can go on and on about players on that list that aren't averaging 10 rebounds. And you neglect that Kris was averaging 10 rebounds while playing 27 minutes on the Nets. You hinge on the 35+ minute season alone but yet you're allowed to introduce other seasons? So when McGee and Hump played
    similar minutes and one did better than the other, it's disregarded?

    I could go on about the cases you list. Hickson? Where was that double digit rebounding on the Cavs when they were the 22nd worst rebounding team in the 10-11 season? Aldridge? 6th worst rebounding team in the league, and he has never broken that plane. Maxiell? Never even crossed 7 and he's played similar minutes to Kris' 27 mpg season where he averaged 10. Horford? Atlanta has always been one of the worst rebounding teams the last few seasons and he hasn't crossed 10. In his 35mpg season, his stats look awfully comparable to Kris, if you ask me. Josh Smith? Same thing as Horford. Never averaged 10 and is one of the worst rebounding teams.

    I can keep going. It's not worth it though.

  9. #114
    Life goes on. ILLsmak's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    10,306

    Default Re: Kris Humprhies is staying with Nets on two-year deal valued at $24 million

    Quote Originally Posted by bagelred
    This is a good deal, but Jeremy Lin is overpaid.







    yea that's what I was thinking...

    guess dude needs to date a Kardashian.

    -Smak

  10. #115
    Local High School Star DirtySanchez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,851

    Default Re: Kris Humphries is re-signing with Nets on two-year deal valued at $24 million

    wow...the new CBA didn't do sh*t.

  11. #116
    College star D12"Magic"'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    N. Jersey
    Posts
    3,866

    Default Re: Kris Humphries is re-signing with Nets on two-year deal valued at $24 million

    Looks like thread went to hell

  12. #117
    Retired Bloggissist 2LeTTeRS's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    www.twitter.com/EsquireSports
    Posts
    6,318

    Default Re: Kris Humprhies is staying with Nets on two-year deal valued at $24 million

    No one denies the fact that Hump can get numbers. The issue is he's not a difference-maker and he's being paid like one.

  13. #118
    NBA rookie of the year It's A VC3!!!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    5,939

    Default Re: Kris Humprhies is staying with Nets on two-year deal valued at $24 million

    Quote Originally Posted by boozehound
    no, I think you have been reasonable (as you most always are) in this thread. Kris is a good rebounder, no doubt.
    I have been preaching humps rebounding and work ethic this entire thread. The way he goes up against frontcourts on his own is amazing. His rebounding and work ethic is what earned him this contract.

  14. #119
    Extra Cheese LJJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    14,526

    Default Re: Kris Humprhies is staying with Nets on two-year deal valued at $24 million

    Quote Originally Posted by wang4three
    I can go on and on about players on that list that aren't averaging 10 rebounds. And you neglect that Kris was averaging 10 rebounds while playing 27 minutes on the Nets. You hinge on the 35+ minute season alone but yet you're allowed to introduce other seasons? So when McGee and Hump played
    similar minutes and one did better than the other, it's disregarded?

    I could go on about the cases you list. Hickson? Where was that double digit rebounding on the Cavs when they were the 22nd worst rebounding team in the 10-11 season? Aldridge? 6th worst rebounding team in the league, and he has never broken that plane. Maxiell? Never even crossed 7 and he's played similar minutes to Kris' 27 mpg season where he averaged 10. Horford? Atlanta has always been one of the worst rebounding teams the last few seasons and he hasn't crossed 10. In his 35mpg season, his stats look awfully comparable to Kris, if you ask me. Josh Smith? Same thing as Horford. Never averaged 10 and is one of the worst rebounding teams.

    I can keep going. It's not worth it though.
    It's not worth it, because you are completely wrong.

    So you are seriously arguing that Josh Smith, Al Horford, Scola or Aldridge aren't vastly superior forwards compared to Kris Humphries, and we are supposed to take you seriously? Are you trolling? Not even the worst homer could be that fanatical.

  15. #120
    National High School Star KDthunderup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    2,344

    Default Re: Kris Humprhies is staying with Nets on two-year deal valued at $24 million

    wtf? If Humphries is a 12 mill player then Ibaka will be max

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •