1. Jackass 1+2
2. Let's Go to Prison
3. Step Brothers
4. Anchorman
5. Tropic Thunder
6. Taladega Knights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby
7. Ace Ventura Pet Detective
8. Harold and Kumar go to White Castle
9. Meet the Fockers
10. Napolean Dynamite/ Bruno (cant decide)
I didnt see all of Borat so not really sure. Bruno was hilarious. One part stands out from all the other parts though that just....was the greatest prank of all time.
Who do the Knicks have that is better at SG? So the guy is immature and stupid. But he is loyal, unlike Lee, Nate will play for almost nothing (a fraction of what he could get in Europe), and is often fun to watch. Look for him to be back for one more year if the Knicks can't upgrade.
lol i was really hoping you added some movies lmao especially since you say your old.I havent watched all of caddyshack and missed the era of chaplin and most of pryor and red foxx etc.
Last edited by franchize : 08-21-2009 at 11:44 AM.
Who do the Knicks have that is better at SG? So the guy is immature and stupid. But he is loyal, unlike Lee, Nate will play for almost nothing (a fraction of what he could get in Europe), and is often fun to watch. Look for him to be back for one more year if the Knicks can't upgrade.
Whos better at SG...
I think Chandler would out play Robinson at the SG position. It would also be one less forward in our forward jam. 2 less actually cuz we wouldnt be signing robinson then.
I think Chandler would out play Robinson at the SG position. It would also be one less forward in our forward jam. 2 less actually cuz we wouldnt be signing robinson then.
So you think that Nate is a SMALL forward? At 5'7" he is undersized at SG -- but he would be A VERY SMALL forward!
Or perhaps you would like to classify him as a dwarf center, too? Then, he could guard the small forwards by punching them in their knees and the big centers by biting them in their ankles!
I am quite amazed that the Post for some odd reason has numerous articles about Nate and his Bronx incident.
Although I am not assigned to that area, I work in the lower Manhattan division, it's not quite that big of a deal.
Nate is a young kid who just has some money and likes to wild out.
Maturity....he has none at all.
I will say the officer and I have read the actual report clearly states that he was pulled over for not having his seatbelt on.
No profiling or anything like that.
Although I will admit that when I used to be on patrol, if I saw out-of-state tags, it would catch my attention.
Not in a pursue type thing, but just because of the uniqueness of the tag, especially if it was as far as Washington.
I have never stopped anyone for tint, although the laws are clear.
Nate was riding with his front windows down, so tint isn't an issue at all.
Had his windows been up he probably would not have been stopped at all. Most officers don't waste their efforts for that.
He did something dumb, and he should have his business in order.
Re: Who REALLY wants Nate back?
