Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jackass18
Reaches based upon what? Kiper's draftboard? How many team has he put together and coached up? Some teams fall in love with a player for whatever reason or just flat out take a risk on some kid's potential. Sometimes it pays off, sometimes it doesn't. Draft grades are forgotten a couple days after the draft. I never really see anyone talking about old draft grades. I looked at some a little bit and there's plenty of things that would make you shake your head now.
|
Based on where they could have taken the player as opposed to where they did...I don't think any team is even aware of what Kiper's projections are, that is just for ESPN viewers...f*ck Kiper, lol
like Oakland could have probably traded down and still have gotten DHB last year...maybe Al tried who knows...
the Jags taking Alualu 10h overall...some had him as a 2nd rounder
Denver actually traded up for Tebow, unless they had inside info on a another team that wanted him, that is beyond confusing...
ect...
if a team competely falls in love with a player that is understandable, but they shouldn't draft the guy in the first round if he was a projected 3rd rounder...
Al drafted a saftey last year in the 2nd round that was a projected 7th rounder...Kiper didn't even know who he was...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RedBlackAttack
This is true. In fact, there is generally little talk about a team's past draft, good or bad. The only exceptions are when a team has an absolutely incredible draft that changes the face of their organization (or an incredibly bad one).
I'd love to see these 'experts' go back a couple years after the draft and re-grade to see how it matches with their original critiques.
|
it seems like Dallas fans, and some Dallas haters, are CONSTANTLY talking about Jerry's drafting and comparing it to Parcells...