If the USA split into two countries, Republicans vs Democrats, which would do better?

[Orlando Magic]

This is not a troll thread. I'm genuinely curious.

Everyone has to pick a side.

If you want to set everyone's net worth back to zero in this hypothetical, you can.

[DeuceWallaces]

Ha, red states as a singular nation would rot. California and New York alone would surpass whatever a GOP nation could bring. What would their urban base be? I guess Dallas.

The blue nation would have an incredible urban base and enough agriculture and manufacturing through California, Michigan, Illinois, Penn, etc. to survive.

Fun question.

[HeatFanSince88]

republicans.

Only because they have less brown/black people.

Standards of living of an area seems to be directly correlated to skin pigmentation. a country is not made up by its policies, but by it's people. The darker people a country/area has, the more corrupt and crimeridden it generally is. This is why even in civilized countries such as the United states, the areas with all black people is virtually the same of that of a third world country full of black people. a community is not defined by its policies, but by its people.

[Patrick Chewing]

Ha, red states as a singular nation would rot. California and New York alone would surpass whatever a GOP nation could bring. What would their urban base be? I guess Dallas.

The blue nation would have an incredible urban base and enough agriculture and manufacturing through California, Michigan, Illinois, Penn, etc. to survive.

Fun question.

Riiiiight. Meanwhile, California is seriously bankrupt and everyone is moving the hell out of New York.

[warriorfan]

Republicans would be too busy watching cuck porn to do anything productive

[Akrazotile]

Ha, red states as a singular nation would rot. California and New York alone would surpass whatever a GOP nation could bring. What would their urban base be? I guess Dallas.

The blue nation would have an incredible urban base and enough agriculture and manufacturing through California, Michigan, Illinois, Penn, etc. to survive.

Fun question.

He said what if the country split into republicans vs democrats.

California and New York have millions of republicans.

If you divided Republicans and Democrats into separate sides of the country, whose country would be better to live in?

The answer is overwhelmingly Republican. Eventually both countries would develop divergent political parties, but in the meantime... overwhelmingly Republicans.

Republicans = Manly men and hot chicks.






Democrats = Ghetto thugs and their pretentious try-hard hipster babysitters.







Where would YOU rather be?

[Patrick Chewing]

God Douche is one ugly broad.

[Akrazotile]

God Douche is one ugly broad.

Which is sad considering he'd be one of the BETTER looking girls in Liberal Land.

[Long Duck Dong]

Is this a joke? Republicans more or less get a long.

A Democrat society would be a total sh!tstorm

BLM
White SJWS
Mexican illegals
Feminists
Muslims
Wealthy white guilt elites
Environmentalists

The only thing holding these people together right now are them using the average common sense Americans as a scapegoat for America''s problems. Take this away and they'd be at each other's throats. Just take a look at Democrat conventions when these people actually gave to rub elbows with each other.

[DeuceWallaces]

The overwhelming majority of the top 100 media markets are Democrats. We're doing fine.

[JtotheIzzo]

blue states >>> red states (except if it wad a weigh in)

[west_tip]

This is an interesting hypothetical.

Is this a joke? Republicans more or less get a long.

A Democrat society would be a total sh!tstorm

BLM
White SJWS
Mexican illegals
Feminists
Muslims
Wealthy white guilt elites
Environmentalists

The only thing holding these people together right now are them using the average common sense Americans as a scapegoat for America''s problems. Take this away and they'd be at each other's throats. Just take a look at Democrat conventions when these people actually gave to rub elbows with each other.

See, thats the thing. The main thing that really binds the Democratic coalition together is the perception that they have a common oppressor in the white, straight, Christian, conservative male. Without that common cause what is there to glue gays, Muslims, Mexicans, blacks and liberals together?

This hypothetical Democratic United States of America would certainly be more racially heterogenous than its Republican equivalent but would it have the necessary cultural cohesion to form a bona fide nation out of? I think it would have some of the same problems as a country like Belgium or Sweden does with enclaves of poorly integrated immigrants living in what are effectively separate, self contained societies.

[Nick Young]

Is this a joke? Republicans more or less get a long.

A Democrat society would be a total sh!tstorm

BLM
White SJWS
Mexican illegals
Feminists
Muslims
Wealthy white guilt elites
Environmentalists

The only thing holding these people together right now are them using the average common sense Americans as a scapegoat for America''s problems. Take this away and they'd be at each other's throats. Just take a look at Democrat conventions when these people actually gave to rub elbows with each other.

The Democratic society was a shit show. Don't you remember the DNC? Half the people walked out. Boos in the coronation speech. Hired seat fillers. White noise machines to silence protesters. It was a certified disaster.

[poido123]

This is not a troll thread. I'm genuinely curious.

Everyone has to pick a side.

If you want to set everyone's net worth back to zero in this hypothetical, you can.

Going on long time Democrat states, you have to wonder if a democratic state works at all.


Gee, who would of thought giving handouts and minorities too much lee way would lead to badly run states?

[bluechox2]

neither, as much of a division that may exist , both sides have a symbiotic relationship...dont let media, far left right extremists fool you,