Re: If We Signed Glen "Big Baby" Davis = Good Move Thoughts?
Randolph, Davis, Arthur, Warrick and Carroll might play some 4 aswell. That is far too jammed up. The only way we go after Davis, is if the trade for Randolph does not work out.
Re: If We Signed Glen "Big Baby" Davis = Good Move Thoughts?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kebab Stall
Randolph, Davis, Arthur, Warrick and Carroll might play some 4 aswell. That is far too jammed up. The only way we go after Davis, is if the trade for Randolph does not work out.
Re: If We Signed Glen "Big Baby" Davis = Good Move Thoughts?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mississippi
IDK, Davis has become just as jumpshot happy as Rudy. He'd still be better than Randolph though.
Why exactly would he be better than randolph? He is not as skilled or talented as randolph and he is becoming a black hole himself. So you would rather get a less talented up and coming randolph
Re: If We Signed Glen "Big Baby" Davis = Good Move Thoughts?
david lee and glen davis are nothing more than role players that wont make us better.we can use aurthur or draft picks for role players.if randolph buys into the team concept and comes to play every night those two would be useless.we dont need another brian cardinal.now if we can get rid of marco garbage
Re: If We Signed Glen "Big Baby" Davis = Good Move Thoughts?
Quote:
Originally Posted by derf
david lee and glen davis are nothing more than role players that wont make us better.we can use aurthur or draft picks for role players.if randolph buys into the team concept and comes to play every night those two would be useless.we dont need another brian cardinal.now if we can get rid of marco garbage
Give me Lee or Davis who know their roles over one of, if not the biggest, black hole in the NBA. We don't need another 20ppg scorer when we already have 2.
Anyone who thinks Randolph is going to push this team any further than it already is, is kidding themselves.
Re: If We Signed Glen "Big Baby" Davis = Good Move Thoughts?
Quote:
Originally Posted by jailer
Why exactly would he be better than randolph? He is not as skilled or talented as randolph and he is becoming a black hole himself. So you would rather get a less talented up and coming randolph
Randolph has been known to be a trouble maker. With Davis we get a player who is truly passionate about the sport and who's going to give it his all. He can do basically everything Randolph does at a cheaper price. Plus he's 4 years younger. It's not like Randolph is going to put us over the top so having a young big like Davis to add to our roster would benefit us in the future because he's only going to get better. His improvement from his rookie year to his 2nd year was truly amazing.