Originally Posted by lakerfreak
Ben Wallace not a superduperstar???
I think he's a unique case where he probably is the best defensively but has 0 and I mean 0 offense so it's hard to consider him a superstud. I think you have to play both ends of the court so in that way Sheed might come ahead of Ben... some analysts even question ben's HOF future b/c they're like if a guy can't hit a jumper, or a free throw or have anything close to an offensive game then maybe he doesn't belong in the HOF. On the opposite end I'm sure there are some HOF people that were brilliant offensively and terrible on D, so maybe it's not fair to not include ben. I mean alot of people r sayin $15mil/yr is overpaying big ben and all the Kobe's and KG's n Shaq's would b considered a bargain for that price so??