Will idiots ever stop using TEAM accomplishments over Player accomplishments

[tmacattack33]

Nope, the media will never allow it.

Why would anyone care about the Finals and the playoffs if player's legacies didn't depend on it?

And I agree, it's better this way. Everything would be kinda boring without rings being so important.

[20Four]

When ever discussing the greatness of a player "idiots" like to talk about the number of championships one has, or the TEAMS record against opposition. Just because a solid player on a great team has a few NBA championships doesn't mean he's the better player then a great player on a not so great team.

Had Lebron James NEVER won a championship, he's still the greatest talent the NBA has ever seen.

What a dumb niqqa do us all a favor and DO NOT post again...

[ImKobe]

When ever discussing the greatness of a player "idiots" like to talk about the number of championships one has, or the TEAMS record against opposition. Just because a solid player on a great team has a few NBA championships doesn't mean he's the better player then a great player on a not so great team.

Had Lebron James NEVER won a championship, he's still the greatest talent the NBA has ever seen.

And he'd be known as a choker & the best player to never win a ring.

Players play for championships, which are overall a team accomplishment, but we can evaluate each player's contributions to a title by looking at the statistics & what they did in the Playoffs to put together a championship run. You need great teammates to win, but there is always a leader, a man who every other player on that team looks up to & trusts to carry them to a title.

MVP is not an individual award either, it's voted by biased media members. It shows nothing about the player itself. Derrick Rose was not even a top 5 player in 2011. So, since he has as many MVPs as Shaq or Kobe, he must be on their level, right?

Steve Nash has as many as Kobe & Shaq combined, he must also have had a better career than either of them.

[Mr. Jabbar]

lebron denying miami in 2011 was a player accomplishment

[Mr. Jabbar]

Had Lebron James NEVER won a championship, he's still the greatest talent the NBA has ever seen.

best joke of all time right here, hes not even with his asterisks

[smoovegittar]

When ever discussing the greatness of a player "idiots" like to talk about the number of championships one has, or the TEAMS record against opposition. Just because a solid player on a great team has a few NBA championships doesn't mean he's the better player then a great player on a not so great team.

Had Lebron James NEVER won a championship, he's still the greatest talent the NBA has ever seen.

For real? Damn.

[Bless Mathews]

RetORdedest thread of the year nominee.

[PsychoBe]

When ever discussing the greatness of a player "idiots" like to talk about the number of championships one has, or the TEAMS record against opposition. Just because a solid player on a great team has a few NBA championships doesn't mean he's the better player then a great player on a not so great team.

Had Lebron James NEVER won a championship, he's still the greatest talent the NBA has ever seen.

"greatest talent the nba has ever seen"

try harder op. maybe you can convince yourself next time.

[riseagainst]

OP is a fakkit.