Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 49
  1. #31
    raep tiem
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    k?
    Posts
    6,258

    Default Re: GT: Jazz (0-4) @ Celtics (0-4) 11/6/2013 - The tank battle

    Quote Originally Posted by CelticBaller
    Our first win?

  2. #32
    101% Dr. Pepper mrpibb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah
    Posts
    1,938

    Default Re: GT: Jazz (0-4) @ Celtics (0-4) 11/6/2013 - The tank battle

    Quote Originally Posted by Xiao Yao You
    No excuse for both of them being on the team other than the tank. They are both 3rd pg's at best.
    Their purpose of their being on the team is to make sure that Trey Burke is the best point guard on the team. They could have brought in Luke Ridnour, but Ridnour's better than Burke at this time in their careers; Ty obviously needs to start Burke, but starting a worse player over another doesn't sit right with the locker room.

    I kind of got mad at Ty during that run, but looking back it was just Kanter and Favors missing shots. Hayward only attempted two shots in the second quarter.

    EDIT: Richard Jefferson, I appreciate you.
    Last edited by mrpibb; 11-06-2013 at 10:03 PM.

  3. #33
    Jazz | Utes | Raiders UtahJazzFan88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    4,095

    Default Re: GT: Jazz (0-4) @ Celtics (0-4) 11/6/2013 - The tank battle

    Kanter, Hayward, Favors, and Burks are solid players. But there is absolutely NOBODY else on this team that is worth a damn besides Rush, and Marvin Williams who have been hurt. Richard Jefferson sometimes shows up, but hardly. Lucas and Tinsley shouldn't even be back-ups in this league.

    Although it is probably a good thing we can get a great pick in the draft.

  4. #34
    101% Dr. Pepper mrpibb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah
    Posts
    1,938

    Default Re: GT: Jazz (0-4) @ Celtics (0-4) 11/6/2013 - The tank battle

    Richard Jefferson has shown up more than Derrick Favors has this year.

  5. #35
    Cancer Wally450's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    11,431

    Default Re: GT: Jazz (0-4) @ Celtics (0-4) 11/6/2013 - The tank battle

    In b4 Celtics blow this lead and lose.

  6. #36
    101% Dr. Pepper mrpibb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah
    Posts
    1,938

    Default Re: GT: Jazz (0-4) @ Celtics (0-4) 11/6/2013 - The tank battle

    Quote Originally Posted by Wally450
    In b4 Celtics blow this lead and lose.
    That's not possible. The way you come back from a 20 point deficit is by cutting it down to something like 10 by the beginning of the 4th quarter. We cannot outscore the Celtics by 22 in 12 minutes.

    EDIT: The Jazz are shooting a better percentage than the Celtics and losing by 13.
    Last edited by mrpibb; 11-06-2013 at 10:29 PM.

  7. #37
    The One CelticBaller's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    CT, GOATLAND
    Posts
    20,026

    Default Re: GT: Jazz (0-4) @ Celtics (0-4) 11/6/2013 - The tank battle

    Olynyk sucks

  8. #38
    101% Dr. Pepper mrpibb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah
    Posts
    1,938

    Default Re: GT: Jazz (0-4) @ Celtics (0-4) 11/6/2013 - The tank battle

    Quote Originally Posted by CelticBaller
    Olynyk sucks
    He was a beast tonight and is the reason you will win. This post sucks.

    EDIT: Now Ian Clark? That dude is bad.

    EDIT #2:

    Development of the Core Four (update):

    A. Burks: 8 pts (4-9 FG), 4 reb, 0 ast, 1 stl, 4 to, 0 pf [+6 in 22 min]
    G. Hayward: 28 pts (12-20 FG), 9 reb, 5 ast, 1 stl, 2 to, 3 pf [-1 in 39 min]
    D. Favors: 10 pts (4-10 FG), 14 reb, 1 ast, 3 blk, 3 to, 4 pf [-12 in 34 min]
    E. Kanter: 22 pts (9-14 FG), 8 reb, 0 ast, 0 to, 2 pf [-4 in 22 min]

    David Locke noticed that Alec Burks is terrible in the first quarter of games. Ty should really consider only playing this guy in the second half.

    Hayward is a player. He didn't shoot enough, frankly.

    This was a needed game for Favors. He needed to have a bad, frustrating game where he can't get subbed out for Millsap or Jefferson. He made some strides but eventually lost his cool with his fourth foul.

    Kanter is a put-back machine, but he needs to crash the boards that don't lead to his scoring--namely, defensive.
    Last edited by mrpibb; 11-06-2013 at 10:53 PM.

  9. #39
    The One CelticBaller's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    CT, GOATLAND
    Posts
    20,026

    Default Re: GT: Jazz (0-4) @ Celtics (0-4) 11/6/2013 - The tank battle

    Quote Originally Posted by mrpibb
    He was a beast tonight and is the reason you will win. This post sucks.
    I watch him play every night and the guy is far from a beast. He chucks and misses open shots in the pain. Don't bite into the "hype"

    Thanks for the Neg btw.

  10. #40
    Serious playground baller mans1ay3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    397

    Default Re: GT: Jazz (0-4) @ Celtics (0-4) 11/6/2013 - The tank battle

    First win.. and it was excruciating to watch.

  11. #41
    The One CelticBaller's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    CT, GOATLAND
    Posts
    20,026

    Default Re: GT: Jazz (0-4) @ Celtics (0-4) 11/6/2013 - The tank battle

    Quote Originally Posted by mans1ay3r
    First win.. and it was excruciating to watch.
    It's going to be a long season

  12. #42
    Where Eagles Dare El Kabong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,376

    Default Re: GT: Jazz (0-4) @ Celtics (0-4) 11/6/2013 - The tank battle

    Well that was terrible. Hopefully Rush and Williams are back full time soon so I don't have to see Mike Harris as much.

    Won't be winning any games soon with that many turnovers either.

  13. #43
    101% Dr. Pepper mrpibb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah
    Posts
    1,938

    Default Re: GT: Jazz (0-4) @ Celtics (0-4) 11/6/2013 - The tank battle

    Quote Originally Posted by CelticBaller
    I watch him play every night and the guy is far from a beast. He chucks and misses open shots in the pain. Don't bite into the "hype"

    Thanks for the Neg btw.
    You're welcome. The game was won when Olynyk took Faverani's job. Remember those first six minutes? That's when Faverani played. You know the rest of the game? That's when Faverani didn't play.

  14. #44
    There will be plaster kNIOKAS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    5,697

    Default Re: GT: Jazz (0-4) @ Celtics (0-4) 11/6/2013 - The tank battle

    Quote Originally Posted by CelticBaller
    Olynyk sucks
    Are you going to stop picking on a player you don't like?

  15. #45
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer Xiao Yao You's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Lockwood, Montana, U.S.A.
    Posts
    49,766

    Default Re: GT: Jazz (0-4) @ Celtics (0-4) 11/6/2013 - The tank battle

    Quote Originally Posted by mrpibb
    Their purpose of their being on the team is to make sure that Trey Burke is the best point guard on the team. They could have brought in Luke Ridnour, but Ridnour's better than Burke at this time in their careers; Ty obviously needs to start Burke, but starting a worse player over another doesn't sit right with the locker room.
    That's the biggest problem with it. Burke looked like a D-leaguer. Neto looked better. He wanted to come over. But they would have looked bad if their late 2nd rounder was better than their lottery pick they traded up for.

    there is absolutely NOBODY else on this team that is worth a damn besides Rush, and Marvin Williams who have been hurt. Richard Jefferson sometimes shows up, but hardly.
    Marvin sucks! I'll take Jefferson or Harris over him any day of the week. Biedrins can rebound and block shots. Evans with a jumper could be a legitimate bench player. Gobert is raw but looks like he will be a player. They have no NBA pg other than Burks who belongs in a NBA rotation. That is their biggest problem.

    Lucas and Tinsley shouldn't even be back-ups in this league.
    3rd stringers. 2 of them with a D-leaguer in Burke. Obvious tank.

    Richard Jefferson has shown up more than Derrick Favors has this year.
    Yep. Not surprising really. Favors hasn't progressed since he's been in the league.

    Now Ian Clark? That dude is bad.
    The good news is his contract is only guranteed for the first couple months so he'll probably be gone unless he shows them something before than. Ideally him and Gobert will be in the D-league if they get healthy.

    Development of the Core Four (update):

    A. Burks: 8 pts (4-9 FG), 4 reb, 0 ast, 1 stl, 4 to, 0 pf [+6 in 22 min]
    G. Hayward: 28 pts (12-20 FG), 9 reb, 5 ast, 1 stl, 2 to, 3 pf [-1 in 39 min]
    D. Favors: 10 pts (4-10 FG), 14 reb, 1 ast, 3 blk, 3 to, 4 pf [-12 in 34 min]
    E. Kanter: 22 pts (9-14 FG), 8 reb, 0 ast, 0 to, 2 pf [-4 in 22 min]
    Hayward with 2 nice games in a row. Nice to see. He's started slowly every year of his career.

    David Locke noticed that Alec Burks is terrible in the first quarter of games. Ty should really consider only playing this guy in the second half.
    He's got to learn. That's what this year's supposed to be about.

    Hayward is a player. He didn't shoot enough, frankly.
    That's not really his game. He'll be at his best filling the box score. Kanter and Burks are more natural scorers.

    This was a needed game for Favors. He needed to have a bad, frustrating game where he can't get subbed out for Millsap or Jefferson. He made some strides but eventually lost his cool with his fourth foul.
    Love to have Millsap in a 3 man rotation with him and Kanter personally.

    Kanter is a put-back machine, but he needs to crash the boards that don't lead to his scoring--namely, defensive.
    It will come. The guy has continued to improve since they got him.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •