2012 OTC PWN WWE/WWF Wrestling Draft - Official Draft Thread

[TheSilentKiller]

Look out bitches because I am picking Mick Foley AKA Cactus Jack AKA Dude Love AKA Mankind AKA GET THE EFF OUTTA MY WAY

[TheSilentKiller]

Despite the GOATs that have been taken, i'm surprised he slipped this far.

It's only fair that I use my next pick to steal whoever you wanted now, so fork him over.

[Loneshot]

It's only fair that I use my next pick to steal whoever you wanted now, so fork him over.

I don't even know who i want. Gotta check out that alumni list.

[Brujesino]

My first pick is andre the giant




Taking into account with what a wrestler did in only his time in WWE/WWF makes one guy a hard pick dont know if i should pick him.hmmmmmmmmmm

might take a little longer with this second pick i narrowed it down to 2 guys.

[TheSilentKiller]

I don't even know who i want. Gotta check out that alumni list.

I have a couple in mind, but I have a feeling Brujesino is going to take at least one of them.

[Maniak]

bruj is up x2

nm he beat me.

[Brujesino]

It was tough picking him since he did alot more in other organizations but i dont think i can pass on Flair

[TheSilentKiller]

This man needs no introduction.

[Brujesino]

I have a couple in mind, but I have a feeling Brujesino is going to take at least one of them.

Did I?

[TheSilentKiller]

Did I?

No, I will pm you the other two I had in mind. But after seeing your Ric Flair pic, I definitely should have been thinking about him.

[Loneshot]

Its tough, trying to pick between two guys right now.

[Loneshot]

I feel like i can't pass on him.

I draft the bringer of pain,

Brock Lesnar

Few can say they took over as fast as this guy.

[AK47DR91]

It depends. Test out the simulator. If the Simulator will always come to only one conclusion, then maybe its not a good idea. Because an argument like "The Rock vs Hogan" can go either way, but if the simulator always sees it one way, then its sort of broken.

Question: When we argue, are we arguing based on just the moves this wrestler has? Because WWE has always been a bit limited ring-wise. Or do we get to argue factors such as fan reaction, mic skill, ability to sell (sell moves), put over other talent, match history, achievements, etc.

I'd go with the latter. I think we should come up with categories that judges can evaluate and critique by, or the judges can come up with their own. Probably have 3 or 5 main categories, with a couple of minor categories related to the main.

Example
Main ----------------------minors
In-ring skills-------offensive arsenal and selling to opponents.
Achievements-------years of main event status/top billing, title runs/length of reigns,
Non-wrestling skills------mic skills, marketable asset

Something like that.

[QuebecBaller]

Loneshot, you stole my pick

[QuebecBaller]

My next pick is: