Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 234567 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 96
  1. #61
    NBA Superstar 97 bulls's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    14,877

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    I-do-agree-with-Swoosh-when-he-says-none-of-those-Spurs-teams-could-beat-the-98Bulls. The-fact-is-that-the-98Bulls-were-every-bit-as-dominant-as-the-96-and-97-versions. They-won-62-games-with-Scottie Pippen-missing-half-the-season. Just-ask-yourself,-how-many-wins-do-they-get-with-a-healthy-Pippen? 68?-70?

    They-were-more-dominant-in-the-finals-too. They-were-up-three-to-one-including--thay-96-54-raping-on-game-3. That-game--6-isnt-nearly-as-close-as-it-wad-with-arelatovely-healthy-Pippen

  2. #62
    Bulls rodman91's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,970

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    Quote Originally Posted by 97 bulls
    I-do-agree-with-Swoosh-when-he-says-none-of-those-Spurs-teams-could-beat-the-98Bulls. The-fact-is-that-the-98Bulls-were-every-bit-as-dominant-as-the-96-and-97-versions. They-won-62-games-with-Scottie Pippen-missing-half-the-season. Just-ask-yourself,-how-many-wins-do-they-get-with-a-healthy-Pippen? 68?-70?

    They-were-more-dominant-in-the-finals-too. They-were-up-three-to-one-including--thay-96-54-raping-on-game-3. That-game--6-isnt-nearly-as-close-as-it-wad-with-arelatovely-healthy-Pippen
    What happened to your keyboard?

  3. #63
    Decent college freshman
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,780

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    Quote Originally Posted by SilkkTheShocker
    the 08 Celtics are so overrated. They got taken to 7 against the Hawks, were a PJ brown jumper from losing to Lebron and Delonte West, beat a washed up Pistons team, and played LA without Bynum. DOMINATION!!!
    The '08 Celtics as well as Garnett himself are overrated. One title and Swoosh calls them a dynasty

  4. #64
    NBA Superstar 97 bulls's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    14,877

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    Quote Originally Posted by rodman91
    What happened to your keyboard?
    Spacebar-doesnt-work-on-my-phone

  5. #65
    2nd Greatest Player Lebron23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Land of 6 NBA titles
    Posts
    61,784

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    I watched the 1999 NBA Finals again. Both Houston and Sprewell had a good finals performance, but the Spurs abused their front court.

    Spurs would beat the Bulls in 6 or 7 games.

    A 21 to 23 yrs. Duncan destroyed Rodman in their regular season match up. Pippen already declined as an offensive player in his last season with the Bulls. Michael would get his numbers against the spurs, but the spurs would win because they have the superior front court. A past his prime Robinson was still way better than Longley.
    Last edited by Lebron23; 09-06-2013 at 02:47 AM.

  6. #66
    Coach SamuraiSWISH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    13,486

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    If the '99 Knicks sans Ewing could give these Spurs a fight. I fully believe the '98 Bulls could beat them or give them a fight at the very least. That '99 Spurs team isn't mythologically dominant like say the 2001 Lakers, 2008 Celtics or something.

    If the '98 team continued into '99 and maybe added some young players to counteract the now advancing ages of MJ, Pip, Rodman and Harper ... they still could've won.

  7. #67
    College superstar Rose'sACL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    4,517

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    Spurs would win in 6.

  8. #68
    NBA lottery pick Fresh Kid's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    long island, NY
    Posts
    5,049

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    tha 98 bulls would win in 6 maybe 5.

  9. #69
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer Smoke117's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    26,793

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    Quote Originally Posted by 97 bulls
    I-do-agree-with-Swoosh-when-he-says-none-of-those-Spurs-teams-could-beat-the-98Bulls. The-fact-is-that-the-98Bulls-were-every-bit-as-dominant-as-the-96-and-97-versions. They-won-62-games-with-Scottie Pippen-missing-half-the-season. Just-ask-yourself,-how-many-wins-do-they-get-with-a-healthy-Pippen? 68?-70?

    They-were-more-dominant-in-the-finals-too. They-were-up-three-to-one-including--thay-96-54-raping-on-game-3. That-game--6-isnt-nearly-as-close-as-it-wad-with-arelatovely-healthy-Pippen
    The competition was a ****ing joke in 98. The 2013-2014 Spurs crush the 98 bulls. That 99 Spurs team is overrated in general though...they were one of the only teams who were getting together and practicing during the lockout...which obviously gave them an advantage over the competition.
    Last edited by Smoke117; 10-08-2016 at 02:12 PM.

  10. #70
    Local High School Star
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,110

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    The Spurs would have to overcome the same problems as the Utah Jazz.

    The Bulls big guards give the small floor generals (Stockton, Avery) major problems.
    And they have no good defenders for Jordan. Utah's Russell was ok, but the had noone who could switch. The Spurs have not one. Elie or Elliot cant guard MJ.

  11. #71
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer 3ball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    that ghoulash joint
    Posts
    31,920

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    .
    Let's compare Lebron and MJ's performance vs. Duncan/Popovich:



    [COLOR="DarkRed"]Lebron missed his walk-off attempt and needed Ray Allen to save him:[/COLOR]






    [COLOR="DarkRed"]Otoh, Jordan MADE his walk-off attempt [COLOR="blue"]from the exact same spot[/COLOR] in his first meeting against Duncan/Popovich to send the game into overtime:[/COLOR]






    [COLOR="DarkRed"]After hitting the walk-off, MJ dominated overtime, including 2 dunks over Duncan:[/COLOR]






    [COLOR="Navy"]In his 2nd meeting against Duncan, MJ dominated Duncan even more thoroughly:[/COLOR]










    It's obvious that Jordan only ever DOMINATED Duncan and guys like Duncan - they weren't "rivals" like they are for Kobe and Lebron.. 6/6

  12. #72
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer 3ball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    that ghoulash joint
    Posts
    31,920

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    .
    In addition to the clear-cut proof above, the Spurs matchup horribly with the Bulls.

    They have no one to guard MJ or Pippen, whereas Rodman could guard Duncan.

  13. #73
    Decent playground baller
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    340

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    Quote Originally Posted by Odinn
    What an awful list.

    2005 Spurs basically defeated 2004 Pistons. But not gonna talk about just Spurs. 2001 Lakers should be #1. And 2010 Lakers team wasn't a team of 2000's also not better than 2009 Lakers.
    01 Lakers are the most overrated team ever from what I have seen online.

  14. #74
    2nd Greatest Player Lebron23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Land of 6 NBA titles
    Posts
    61,784

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    Bump

  15. #75
    2nd Greatest Player Lebron23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Land of 6 NBA titles
    Posts
    61,784

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    Quote Originally Posted by Lebron23 View Post
    I watched the 1999 NBA Finals again. Both Houston and Sprewell had a good finals performance, but the Spurs abused their front court.

    Spurs would beat the Bulls in 6 or 7 games.

    A 21 to 23 yrs. Duncan destroyed Rodman in their regular season match up. Pippen already declined as an offensive player in his last season with the Bulls. Michael would get his numbers against the spurs, but the spurs would win because they have the superior front court. A past his prime Robinson was still way better than Longley.
    I agree with my old posts.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •