-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
The latest BS on ISH: the 90's didn't defend the 3-pointer
Teams attempted far less 3-pointers and had worse 3-pt efficiency in the 90's - so how did the 90's NOT stop the 3?
ALL eras defend good shooters tightly on the perimeter... So guys like Reggie Miller, Bird or Dale Ellis were guarded just as tightly as today.
Infact, they were guarded much tighter due to legal hand-checking, which is banned in today's game - the NBA's current hands-off rule requires space between defender and ballhandler, allowing for easier driving and shooting than previous eras.
.
Last edited by 3ball; 03-21-2016 at 07:57 PM.
-
Not airballing my layups anymore
Re: The latest BS on ISH: the 90's didn't defend the 3-pointer
Seriously, welcomed to my ignore list. I've ignored exactly 3 people in 35 year
of following the NBA. Seek help.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: The latest BS on ISH: the 90's didn't defend the 3-pointer
Originally Posted by aquaadverse
Seriously, welcomed to my ignore list. I've ignored exactly 3 people in 35 year
of following the NBA. Seek help.
I'm glad the OP pissed you off that much.
-
Re: The latest BS on ISH: the 90's didn't defend the 3-pointer
Originally Posted by aquaadverse
Seriously, welcomed to my ignore list. I've ignored exactly 3 people in 35 year
of following the NBA. Seek help.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: The latest BS on ISH: the 90's didn't defend the 3-pointer
Originally Posted by Spurs5Rings2014
ALL eras defend good shooters tightly on the perimeter... So guys like Reggie Miller, Bird or Dale Ellis were guarded just as tightly as today.
However, 3-point defense was a secondary concern against most 80's and 90's players because few were 3-point shooters and [COLOR="Navy"]the 3-point-producing, drive-and-kick plays of today's game weren't common back then[/COLOR] - POST-UPS were the staple of most offenses, so teams had to emphasize defending the paint instead of the 3-point line.
.
Last edited by 3ball; 03-21-2016 at 08:00 PM.
-
Gif-ted
Re: The latest BS on ISH: the 90's didn't defend the 3-pointer
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: The latest BS on ISH: the 90's didn't defend the 3-pointer
Originally Posted by bigkingsfan
Now that teams have sufficient 3-point shooting personnel to drive-and-kick for 3-pointers (as opposed to 2-pointers), the drive-and-kick format has become more efficient than the post-up format.. This proves that the decline in post-ups is due to higher efficiency drive-and-kick made possible by 3-pointers, not defensive tactics.. In the absence of 3-pointers, no amount of defensive strategy could prevent post-ups from supplanting drive-and-kick..
Since post-ups, mid-range, off-ball and isolations were the only things left in the 80's without the 3-pointers needed to make drive-and-kick worthwhile, we can say with certainty that many of today's elite players would be lesser players back then - their 3-and-D skill sets exclude elite ability in any of the aforementioned areas.
.
Last edited by 3ball; 03-21-2016 at 08:15 PM.
-
Re: The latest BS on ISH: the 90's didn't defend the 3-pointer
-
Re: The latest BS on ISH: the 90's didn't defend the 3-pointer
-
Kevin Love
Re: The latest BS on ISH: the 90's didn't defend the 3-pointer
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: The latest BS on ISH: the 90's didn't defend the 3-pointer
.
Thread Cliffs:
ALL eras defend good shooters tightly on the perimeter - guys like Reggie Miller, Bird or Dale Ellis were guarded just as tightly as today.
Infact, they were guarded much tighter due to legal hand-checking, which is banned in today's game - the NBA's current hands-off rule requires space between defender and ballhandler, allowing for easier driving and shooting than previous eras.
However, 3-point defense was a secondary concern against most 80's and 90's players because few were 3-point shooters and the 3-point-producing, drive-and-kick plays of today's game weren't common back then - POST-UPS were the staple of most offenses, so teams had to emphasize defending the paint instead of the 3-point line.
But now that teams have sufficient 3-point shooting personnel to drive-and-kick for 3-pointers (as opposed to 2-pointers), the drive-and-kick format has become more efficient than the post-up format.. This proves that the decline in post-ups is due to higher efficiency drive-and-kick made possible by 3-pointers, not defensive tactics.. In the absence of 3-pointers, no amount of defensive strategy could prevent post-ups from supplanting drive-and-kick..
Since post-ups, mid-range, off-ball and isolations were the only things left in the 80's without the 3-pointers needed to make drive-and-kick worthwhile, we can say with certainty that many of today's elite players would be lesser players back then - their 3-and-D skill sets exclude elite ability in any of the aforementioned areas.
-
NBA lottery pick
Re: The latest BS on ISH: the 90's didn't defend the 3-pointer
-
NBA rookie of the year
Re: The latest BS on ISH: the 90's didn't defend the 3-pointer
-
Championship or bust
Re: The latest BS on ISH: the 90's didn't defend the 3-pointer
I recall many players that had an open 3 would still take a quick dribble inside the arc for an uncontested 18-20 foot midrange. A lot of that was because many players outside of 3 pt specialists didn't practice that shot as much as players do today. It's not that the 3 wasn't a contested shot, it's overall even long Midrange was considered a more efficient shot. This not the case in today's game,it's clearly just a different style of offense now. Defense as well for this very reason
-
Mugshot from SlyCooper
Re: The latest BS on ISH: the 90's didn't defend the 3-pointer
ignored
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|