David Robinson was amazing and he can play defense much better but Barkley is too versatile for David in offense
One was a C and the other a PF, who started his career as a 2/3 in Philly. Obviously Barkley would be more versitile then D-Rob on offense. As much as I love Barkely, I think if you put David Robinson on some of those Phoenix teams you might have seen some titles.
David Robinson was a Nobody In his Prime when Facing a HEALTHY BARKLEY before 1996 and HAKEEM. If it wasn`t for CF Tim Duncan he would have never ever won any championships. Ever!
I remember what a puss*****y Robinson was in 1993 against Barkley and when he got the MVP in 95 i was so pissed i knew Hakeem would destroy Duncan in the clutch, and he did
Barkley was a way Better Scorer than Duncan, not Just Better ...Way Better
Way Better Passer
Way Better Dribbler
Way Better Game Creator
Clearly Better Rebounder
Way Better Clutch Player (Both for Big Games and Last Second Shots)
Way Better Skilled Player: Far Range Shooter, Mid Range Shooter, 1 on 1 Driver, Off the Dribble Scorer...etc
Superior Floor Defender aswell
Thigs Robinson was Better was:
Interior Defender....thats about it...
David Robinson never took games over like Charles did in the Play-Offs
I don't know why we're even comparing these two. They are totally different types of player. Obviously Barkey was a better long range shooter because Robinson didn't shoot from long range. Obviously Robinson was a better interior defender, because he was a shot blocking C.
You're even a bigger idiot than I thought. If you can't understand simple things like that.....
For your heavy retardation, people say you without the are a lot of the time but I don't expect someone like you to know that because you don't socialize with people outside of your home or should I say house?
Dis b1tch iz hilarious
LOL you still an idiot is 1) WRONG LOL.... "are" would always have to be used with still coming after, you still an idiot... LOL ....