Page 2 of 12 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 166
  1. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    6,677

    Default Re: Did MJ really had a vertical of 48"?

    He didn't. If he did his head would be half a foot over the rim when he leaped.

  2. #17
    Trump Towers LikeABosh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    2,850

    Default Re: Did MJ really had a vertical of 48"?

    Wilt's vertical was 55", he beat the shit out of mountain lions and banged 5 women a day since he was 10. Its all true cuz I read it on the internet

  3. #18
    Banned (lol) scandisk_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1,274

    Default Re: Did MJ really had a vertical of 48"?

    My best guess would be 43 (on his earlier years) to 44 max

  4. #19
    Good High School Starter notatop29pg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    832

    Default Re: Did MJ really had a vertical of 48"?

    Quote Originally Posted by magnax1
    He didn't. If he did his head would be half a foot over the rim when he leaped.
    If he jumped from directly below the hoop yes.

    I'm not sure but is the peak height reduced when jumping forward as compared to jumping straight up?

    Either way... i dont think his vert was that high, pretty sure i read in one of his books that he said his vert was lower than dominiques and Clydes.

  5. #20
    Decent college freshman
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    new yawk
    Posts
    2,843

    Default Re: Did MJ really had a vertical of 48"?

    he obviously doesn't. jordan had really good hops, but he wasn't a freak or anything.

  6. #21
    Decent playground baller
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    361

    Default Re: Did MJ really had a vertical of 48"?

    Does no one understand the difference between a max recorded vertical & in-game jumping?

    When recording ones vertical, the jump is done in a manner where the player moves as little laterally as possible. Weather it's 1-step, 2-step or a simple collect & jump, you don't want to be losing inches by having lateral movement.

    In game dunks specifically focus on lateral movement with vertical movement coming second. Very rarely are guards dunking off a collect jump or a 1-step jump because the opportunities for such dunks are prevented by bigs typically.

  7. #22
    Entity of Existence Living Being's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1,386

    Default Re: Did MJ really had a vertical of 48"?

    No more than 44".

  8. #23
    Banned (lol) scandisk_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1,274

    Default Re: Did MJ really had a vertical of 48"?

    Not even close to 40. MJ blocking a fast break layup but ends up hitting his head on the backboard nearly knocking himself unconcious.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MITo...eature=related

  9. #24
    Doomguy clipps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Thy Flesh Consumed
    Posts
    4,270

    Default Re: Did MJ really had a vertical of 48"?

    Some of these arguements are absolutely retarded. It doesn't take 48 inches for a player of MJ's height to complete a dunk so he's not gonna jump to his entire potential. I'm sure if Jordan wanted to, he would have let himself smack his head on the rim

  10. #25
    NBA Legend pauk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    17,478

    Default Re: Did MJ really had a vertical of 48"?

    Quote Originally Posted by jongib369
    Here is a counter argument, think of it what you will. Just spreading the "knowledge" so people can make their own opinions :)

    http://blitzsportsnetwork.com/2012/0...vertical-jump/

    http://www.topendsports.com/testing/...tical-jump.htm
    Interesting!

  11. #26
    NBA Legend pauk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    17,478

    Default Re: Did MJ really had a vertical of 48"?

    James White vertical leap is 46"... and is 6'6"-6'7"...







    So i mean if Jordan had 48"... im sure it would look at least close to something like this.... at least once
    Last edited by pauk; 08-01-2012 at 09:10 PM.

  12. #27
    Local High School Star DatAsh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Re: Did MJ really had a vertical of 48"?

    Quote Originally Posted by jongib369
    Here is a counter argument, think of it what you will. Just spreading the "knowledge" so people can make their own opinions :)

    http://blitzsportsnetwork.com/2012/0...vertical-jump/

    http://www.topendsports.com/testing/...tical-jump.htm
    no where in either of those links do I see evidence of a 48 inch vertical.

    at Randy Moss having a 51" vertical.

    For caparison, here's what a 52" vertical looks like.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IclEQA48IOE

  13. #28
    NBA Legend pauk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    17,478

    Default Re: Did MJ really had a vertical of 48"?

    Quote Originally Posted by DatAsh
    For caparison, here's what a 52" vertical looks like.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IclEQA48IOE
    Dude could basically clear Yao Ming while doing a reverse jam

  14. #29
    NBA Legend coin24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Tiny Hateraids Head
    Posts
    17,072

    Default Re: Did MJ really had a vertical of 48"?

    In b4 jlauber tells us the space jam mj half court dunk was originally done by wilt

  15. #30
    Decent college freshman Calabis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    2,797

    Default Re: Did MJ really had a vertical of 48"?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dictator
    MJ didn't have a 48 vert. Lebron supposely has a 45 vert and he has never had his head over the rim despite being atleast 3 inches taller and longer arms.
    Lebron has had several moments with his head at rim level, with the ball in his hand

    also in this vid, Jordan is leaning the opposite way of the way he jumped, yet his head is very close to the rim.....this isn't even probably his max output. Assuming he can get his head higher then the rim without the ball, is not as far fetched as you guys are making it out to be.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwiRSo_1ujw

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •