I have more respect for a mugger than for a privileged rich man

[Bandito]

[QUOTE=K

[K]

You did what? I don't even remember what you wrote and I am not even going to bother.

But if you think violence is best option than the opposite you are just an immature man mad at the world because people like Miley Cyrus are richer just because they are.

Let me know when your reading comprehension skills rise above kindergarten level.

[Bandito]

[QUOTE=K

[K]

I find myself agreeing with a lot of the stuff you have been saying in this thread. Land ownership is a rather strange concept when I really think about it, and the idea of owning and profiting off of subsurface minerals is even more bizzare.

As a society we want to make production as rewarding as possible and this means in the case of landowning and mineral rights owning to require the privilege holder to pay compensation for the deprivation they impose on everyone else so they can't just stuff parts of other people's production in their pockets despite not contributing to production. Such a system would be magnitudes more just and efficient than the current system where we do the reverse and impose a burden on production to enrich the rent seekers.

[K]

Lost the argument and resolved to insults, and I am the one under kindergarten level

funny kid.A loser who is jealous people around him are getting better while he is in the same couch whining about how a violent mugger is better than a rich man because he is dirt poor working for MCD because he's not smart enough to earn more than minimum wage. A true BETA.

Straw men and ad homs noted, as usual. If you have nothing to offer stop boring me.

[Bandito]

[QUOTE=K

[MavsSuperFan]

[QUOTE=K

[Simple Jack]

OP is flat out wrong regarding why we have property law, amongst the other things he's mentioned in this thread. Why is anyone taking him seriously?