Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 38
  1. #16
    National High School Star
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,486

    Default Re: NBA 2K8 GS Warriors Player Rankings

    Monta has a D+ potential? hmm Everybodys rating seems too high

  2. #17
    The Big Bang
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    836

    Default Re: NBA 2K8 GS Warriors Player Rankings

    Another flaw 2k8 has yet to address, Live continues to dominate the accuracy of rankings.

  3. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    limbo
    Posts
    5,131

    Default Re: NBA 2K8 GS Warriors Player Rankings

    will 2k ever get the 3pt ratings right? Al Harrington an 86 is even worse than Rip having a 91 last year.

  4. #19
    Cuba
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,475

    Default Re: NBA 2K8 GS Warriors Player Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by Uchiha_Hai
    Another flaw 2k8 has yet to address, Live continues to dominate the accuracy of rankings.

    Really?

    Live 08
    Tim Duncan - 91
    Gilbert Arenas - 91

  5. #20
    Sit yo ass down! LBJ 4 MVP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    2,126

    Default Re: NBA 2K8 GS Warriors Player Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by Uchiha_Hai
    Another flaw 2k8 has yet to address, Live continues to dominate the accuracy of rankings.
    2k's ratings may be high, but they are 100x better than Live 08's rankings.
    I dont think anyone is going to get over 98 in 2k though.
    Kobe - 98
    Bron - 97
    TD- 96
    those are my guesses.
    2k's rankings have always been high, but there players styles and statistics have always been accurate.

  6. #21
    Bucks fan
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    3,397

    Default Re: NBA 2K8 GS Warriors Player Rankings

    I'm not sure what the ratings mean now that they've introduced hotspots. Bruce Bowen will shoot 3's well from the corners but not from the top. But it looks like they will give him one number for 3's on the visible menu even though it's really 5 different numbers.

  7. #22
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    limbo
    Posts
    5,131

    Default Re: NBA 2K8 GS Warriors Player Rankings

    Another flaw 2k8 has yet to address, Live continues to dominate the accuracy of rankings.
    who cares about a number? if you actually played 2k Duncan and KG were top 5 players. not in Live.

    you could single handedly dominate with Duncan on both ends. they really got that right.

    there's one thing they GOTTA fix though. and that's the way your feet were ALWAYS on the line whenever you shot a 3. I'd shoot 20 threes in a game and only 8 would be counted as 3s. one foot on the line. it's absolutely horrible. they could automatically set right behind the line, with all the other unecessary animations they make players do, they could at least set up in the right place. and how is it possible to hit a corner 3 with say Bowen? you either step out or step on the line.

  8. #23
    Bucks fan
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    3,397

    Default Re: NBA 2K8 GS Warriors Player Rankings

    It's true that you don't make many 3s from the corners. Maybe they fixed it?

  9. #24
    I bust ghosts skillswithaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,171

    Default Re: NBA 2K8 GS Warriors Player Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by geeWiz15
    who cares about a number? if you actually played 2k Duncan and KG were top 5 players. not in Live.

    you could single handedly dominate with Duncan on both ends. they really got that right.
    exactly. overall ratings don't mean crap except for the player is well-rounded.

    I've explained this a thousand times and people still don't get it.

    So here, I'll try it differently.

    You have one PF/C who is a monster in the paint. He has great inside scoring, great rebounding, good blocking, and average passing.

    Then you have a PF/C who is basically a hybrid. He has good inside scoring, good rebounding, good blocking, good passing, good dribbling, good awareness, good outside shooting, and good stealing.

    The second guy will be higher ranked. But if I'm starting a team out, I'll take the first guy because I know I can get points, rebounding, and defense.

  10. #25
    Smooth Like Butter Richie2k6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    8,910

    Default Re: NBA 2K8 GS Warriors Player Rankings

    Maybe the person doing the association trained them so their ratings went up? You never know.
    Another flaw 2k8 has yet to address, Live continues to dominate the accuracy of rankings.
    Live's ratings are complete garbage. Live 06: Kidd - 85, Iverson - 89, Marion - 91.

  11. #26
    Religion? LOL? WTF? ALBballer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    8,273

    Default Re: NBA 2K8 GS Warriors Player Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by geeWiz15
    who cares about a number? if you actually played 2k Duncan and KG were top 5 players. not in Live.

    you could single handedly dominate with Duncan on both ends. they really got that right.

    there's one thing they GOTTA fix though. and that's the way your feet were ALWAYS on the line whenever you shot a 3. I'd shoot 20 threes in a game and only 8 would be counted as 3s. one foot on the line. it's absolutely horrible. they could automatically set right behind the line, with all the other unecessary animations they make players do, they could at least set up in the right place. and how is it possible to hit a corner 3 with say Bowen? you either step out or step on the line.
    Agreed.

    They did fix the problem in College Hoops though.

    hmm.. a 93 seems a bit high. that means lebron is gonna be a 99 or 100.

    tim duncan better be a 100, too.
    No one should be a 100. A 100 should be a player that can shoot from the outside, post up, defend, pass and etc.

    And the ratings always suck in 2k games. Shannon Brown was a 74 but Bargnani was below 70 (iirc.)

    Baron Davis 93? More like a 85 or so.

    My Knick ratings would be as follows

    PG: Marbury (83) Nate Robinson (74) Mardy Collins (72)
    SG: Crawford (79) Fred Jones (69)
    SF: Q-Rich (78) Balkman (73) Jeffries (69)
    PF: Randolph (85) Lee (78)
    C: Curry (82) Rose (70) Chandler (65)

  12. #27
    ISH's Negro Historian L.Kizzle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Houston, TX -
    Posts
    41,029

    Default Re: NBA 2K8 GS Warriors Player Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by abuC
    Really?

    Live 08
    Tim Duncan - 91
    Gilbert Arenas - 91
    Well Arenas is cover boy, so they gotta give him something.

  13. #28
    I bust ghosts skillswithaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,171

    Default Re: NBA 2K8 GS Warriors Player Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by ALBballer
    Agreed.

    They did fix the problem in College Hoops though.



    No one should be a 100. A 100 should be a player that can shoot from the outside, post up, defend, pass and etc.

    And the ratings always suck in 2k games. Shannon Brown was a 74 but Bargnani was below 70 (iirc.)

    Baron Davis 93? More like a 85 or so.

    My Knick ratings would be as follows

    PG: Marbury (83) Nate Robinson (74) Mardy Collins (72)
    SG: Crawford (79) Fred Jones (69)
    SF: Q-Rich (78) Balkman (73) Jeffries (69)
    PF: Randolph (85) Lee (78)
    C: Curry (82) Rose (70) Chandler (65)
    no thanks...Chandler is w/out a doubt a SF, Rose is w/out a doubt a C. What about Morris? And those are only 13 players, so what about Nichols?

    Chandler may be a rookie, but he is the definition of an everything player.

    Everything else seems to be pretty good. I could argue for hours for why Mardy Collins should be at least a 75, but i won't.

  14. #29
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    OJ Mayo's Crew
    Posts
    1,048

    Default Re: NBA 2K8 GS Warriors Player Rankings

    NBA 2K >>>>>>>>>>>>> NBA Live in everything

  15. #30
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    2,114

    Default Re: NBA 2K8 GS Warriors Player Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by geeWiz15
    will 2k ever get the 3pt ratings right? Al Harrington an 86 is even worse than Rip having a 91 last year.
    2k Sports crew don't watch basketball. They just go by stats. Al Harrington shot 43%+ from 3.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •