If all Democrats were forced to live together, same for Republicans. Would it work?

[Back In Shape]

And how do you think things would play out in the 2 respective societies?

I'm talking all demographics(race,education,income level) all living side by side, with the only common criteria being party affiliation.

I don't want to know which one you think is better, rather what each society would look and function like.

[Terahite]

Us independents don't really think about this shit. We'd rather see the divisive party system abolished. Trump will get it done.

Trump the Great Unifier.

[Overdrive]

Of course it would work, but they look for difference in between them and on one side there'd be Republicans and Dempublicans and on the other Democrats Repocrats.

Mankind loves to devide.

[JohnnySic]

Democrats can take the northeast and west coast and republicans can have the flyover states.

Something like this:

[DCL]

they would find new things to argue with each other.

[Nick Young]

The Dems would begin purging each other and never stop finding more enemies in the party they need to publicly shame and kick out, and more things to get needlessly upset about.


I don't know how Repub culture would function.

[DukeDelonte13]

New York and California

versus

Mississippi and Alabama?

[Akrazotile]

New York and California

versus

Mississippi and Alabama?

New York and California would completely collapse without its conservative-minded business owners and workforce. They are basically the poles that hold up the tent for all the immigrants and hippies.

A state filled with Republicans would be divided socially among evangelicals and libertarians, but economically it would be strong af.

An entirely Democrat state would have lots of kumbaya and no social judgement - by white people anyway, blacks would likely continue as the most homophobic demographic - but economically it would be a shit show.

Republicans build strong, safe communities. Democrats emphasize sensitivity, tolerance, individuals getting whatever they want. Basically Republicans make kids eat their vegetables even if they dont want to - Democrats let their kids have candy for dinner and pat themselves on the back for being "the cool parent."


This question isnt even a contest. Republicans would run shit, Democrats would descend into poverty and slavery basically, with poor blacks enslaving pu$$y white cuckolds, except with little economic function in place to even make it prosperous.

[Edgar Friendly]

New York and California

versus

Mississippi and Alabama?

CA and NY literally are the TOP 2 most segregated areas in the USA. Mississippi and Alabama are in the 2 of the 3 LEAST segregated states in the USA. So uhhmmm no.

If Democrats and Republicans had to actually be literal neighbors. No walls, no separate school districts, no gated communities.

Republicans





Democrats

[UK2K]

Everyone knows, deep down inside, that if you split the country into two with one party on each side, it'd only be a matter of time before the Democrat side starts hopping the fence to the Republican side.

It's being disingenuous to suggest anything otherwise.

[BoutPractice]

If the United States were an apartment building, and you put all the Democrats in one shared apartment and all the Republicans in another, they'd still all have the same landlord.

[Im Still Ballin]

New York and California would completely collapse without its conservative-minded business owners and workforce. They are basically the poles that hold up the tent for all the immigrants and hippies.

A state filled with Republicans would be divided socially among evangelicals and libertarians, but economically it would be strong af.

An entirely Democrat state would have lots of kumbaya and no social judgement - by white people anyway, blacks would likely continue as the most homophobic demographic - but economically it would be a shit show.

Republicans build strong, safe communities. Democrats emphasize sensitivity, tolerance, individuals getting whatever they want. Basically Republicans make kids eat their vegetables even if they dont want to - Democrats let their kids have candy for dinner and pat themselves on the back for being "the cool parent."


This question isnt even a contest. Republicans would run shit, Democrats would descend into poverty and slavery basically, with poor blacks enslaving pu$$y white cuckolds, except with little economic function in place to even make it prosperous.

CJ Samuels with the DAGGER.

[nathanjizzle]

the republican side would not have internet or computers. they would be driving fuel burning trucks into the year 2200. they would still allow blacks to eat at restaurants as long as the blacks feel out of place and uncomfortable about it.

[poido123]

the republican side would not have internet or computers. they would be driving fuel burning trucks into the year 2200. they would still allow blacks to eat at restaurants as long as the blacks feel out of place and uncomfortable about it.

[NumberSix]

the republican side would not have internet or computers. they would be driving fuel burning trucks into the year 2200. they would still allow blacks to eat at restaurants as long as the blacks feel out of place and uncomfortable about it.

Did computers and Internet come out of capitalist or socialist countries? Hmmm.

You notice Apple, Microsoft and IBM came out of America. Not Sweden or the USSR.

Dem supporters are too dumb to recognize how dumb they are. Lefties confirming the Dunning-Kruger effect on a daily basis.