Originally Posted by DieHardBullsFan
Plus if Mike Congley Jr. falls to the 9th spot (which I highly doubt) would you draft him if you were the Bulls and trade Hinrich for a big man?...I certainly would!....I wanna hear yall thoughts?
No that'd be retarded. Hinrich is Chicago's best all-around player. Why trade your coaches dream player who is really proving himself in the NBA for a unproven rookie who is IMO over-rated.
Here is Mike Conley Jr.'s stat line.
11.3 points, 3.4 rebounds, 6.1 assists, 2.2 turnovers, 2.2 steals, 52% FG shooter, 69% FT shooter, 30% 3P shooter.
IMO those numbers really arn't amazing, yes he did play with a stacked team, but shouldn't that help a whole lot of getting open looks? 30% 3P shooter? 69% FT shooter? And he really doesn't have a whole lot of expierence since he was a freshmen. And talking about size, Kirk is atleast 10 pounds heavier and 2-3 inches taller.
Here is Kirk's college stats, averaged over his 4 YEARS at KANSAS.
12.4 points, 3.8 rebounds, 4.7 assists, 2.7 turnovers, 1.5 steals, 49% FG shooter, 43% 3P shooter, 78% FT shooter.
Here are his highs at each stat across his 4 years.
17.3 points, 4.8 rebounds, 6.9 assists, 2.2 turnovers, 1.9 steals, 54% FG shooter, 51% 3P shooter, 81% FT shooter.
I think overall Hinrich's numbers look better - and he stayed all 4 years to gain expierence - something Mike doesn't have.