Originally Posted by ROCSteady
No I don't think he was GOAT. I think he was on track to be top 3 all time.
If you think Sean taylor was 'very bad' at coverage, it's obvious you're very ignorant in this subject and most likely a dumbass overall.
Top 3 all time? And you considered me a dumbass??? What an idiot..
You have cero knowledge then on how ST played in the NFL.. I do consider he was very bad in coverage, he had some splash plays and he was a hitter, but he was not good at all covering the field, he was always getting abused.
Give me John Lynch every day when he was a Buccaneer (not his late years), he was a better hitter and covered the field better than ST.