Page 1 of 11 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 154
  1. #1
    Common Sense Istealfrombums's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    108

    Default No triple-double for LeBron in NY: NBA rescinds that 10th rebound

    "NBA has announced LeBron James was mistakenly credited with one of Ben Wallace's rebounds."

    Somehow this is breaking news on Yahoo Sports!

    UPDATE: Here is the story: http://www.insidehoops.com/blog/?p=3344
    Last edited by insidehoops; 02-06-2009 at 05:14 PM.

  2. #2
    TP23 lilojmayo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    5,288

    Default Re: "No triple-double for LeBron"

    Quote Originally Posted by Stacey King
    Link?
    http://sports.yahoo.com/nba;_ylt=Ai0...ACoo1XiE45nYcB

  3. #3
    ROY=D-Rose Stacey King's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    326

    Default Re: "No triple-double for LeBron"

    You're right, I'm looking at it too. While it's only one rebound, it really changes things- from a historical significance standpoint at least.

  4. #4
    NBA Superstar eliteballer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    14,108

    Default Re: "No triple-double for LeBron"

    Serves his stat-padding rear right

  5. #5
    Diaw Fan
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    VanCity
    Posts
    1,659

    Default Re: "No triple-double for LeBron"

    ****ing scrub that Lebron. How dare he fail at a triple double. Trade his overrated ass. Raptors will give you Jermaine O'Neal.

  6. #6
    TP23 lilojmayo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    5,288

    Default Re: "No triple-double for LeBron"

    Quote Originally Posted by eliteballer
    Serves his stat-padding rear right
    he did stat pad. It was obvious from his last rebound he got noticed how none of the cavs player even went for the rebound.

    LeBron cares to much about stats he really does.

  7. #7
    Local High School Star barbaroi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,312

    Default Re: "No triple-double for LeBron"

    Quote Originally Posted by lilojmayo
    * Waits for Laker/Kobe Fans you say Kobe had the better Game Now*
    It was the better game before the rebound was taken back and it is the better game after as well.
    Lebron had 8 more minutes to play. Give Kobe 8 more minutes and he was on pace for 75. In addition to that Kobe's 61 led to the lakers blowing the knicks out, while Lebron's 52 had the game going down to the wire.

  8. #8
    Diaw Fan
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    VanCity
    Posts
    1,659

    Default Re: "No triple-double for LeBron"

    Quote Originally Posted by lilojmayo
    * Waits for Laker/Kobe Fans you say Kobe had the better Game Now*

    Well no duh. One rebound can drastically change history. You think if the Shaq field goal that was blocked had gone into the hands of Bibby instead of Horry we'd be talking about "any SG + Shaq = 3 titles"? No. We'd be talking about "any SG + Shaq = titles in off years ala Duncan".

  9. #9
    soundcloud.com/agua-1 andgar923's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    18,691

    Default Re: "No triple-double for LeBron"

    Quote Originally Posted by eliteballer
    Serves his stat-padding rear right
    And Kobe going after the Garden record wasn't?

  10. #10
    Diaw Fan
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    VanCity
    Posts
    1,659

    Default Re: "No triple-double for LeBron"

    Quote Originally Posted by barbaroi
    It was the better game before the rebound was taken back and it is the better game after as well.
    Lebron had 8 more minutes to play. Give Kobe 8 more minutes and he was on pace for 75. In addition to that Kobe's 61 led to the lakers blowing the knicks out, while Lebron's 52 had the game going down to the wire.
    I strongly disagree. Any idiot will be able to tell you that a triple double highly transcends a 52-10-9 performance. It's not even close. Even Ricky Davis would be able to tell you that. Don't feign ignorance with us young man.

  11. #11
    Certified ISHiot.
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    19,080

    Default Re: "No triple-double for LeBron"

    if this is true, it's extremely lame. it's been days since the triple double, you can't take it away now.

  12. #12
    ROY=D-Rose Stacey King's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    326

    Default Re: "No triple-double for LeBron"

    [QUOTE=Prodigy]Well no duh. One rebound can drastically change history. You think if the Shaq field goal that was blocked had gone into the hands of Bibby instead of Horry we'd be talking about "any SG + Shaq = 3 titles"? No. We'd be talking about "any SG + Shaq = titles in off years ala Duncan".[/QUOTE]

    Not true, as the Lakers had already won two in a row ('00,'01) before that series against the Kings in '02.

  13. #13
    soundcloud.com/agua-1 andgar923's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    18,691

    Default Re: "No triple-double for LeBron"

    Quote Originally Posted by barbaroi
    It was the better game before the rebound was taken back and it is the better game after as well.
    Lebron had 8 more minutes to play. Give Kobe 8 more minutes and he was on pace for 75. In addition to that Kobe's 61 led to the lakers blowing the knicks out, while Lebron's 52 had the game going down to the wire.
    Yet in 8 less minutes, Kobe managed to take more ft's and a few less shots.

  14. #14
    Diaw Fan
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    VanCity
    Posts
    1,659

    Default Re: "No triple-double for LeBron"

    Quote Originally Posted by Stacey King

    Not true, as the Lakers had already won two in a row ('00,'01) before that series against the Kings in '02.
    Damnit all.

  15. #15
    Canned DuMa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    21,990

    Default Re: "No triple-double for LeBron"

    lebron will just have to go for another 50-10-10 game vs the Lakers :)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •