-
College superstar
Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?
Why didn't they keep him? He was so good he carried the team and beat the nets in the playoffs
-
First Kobe fan on ISH
Re: Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?
-
#Dre Day in Sac Town
Re: Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?
Why did the Nuggets sign him?
-
3-time NBA All-Star
Re: Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?
Originally Posted by JohnFreeman
$$$$$$
because he's making so much in denver?
2-3 mill a year. for one more year (two total)
-
Smile, you're on ISH
Re: Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?
They thought Derrick was going to be healthy. That's it, nothing more.
-
3-time NBA All-Star
Re: Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?
Originally Posted by andremiller07
Why did the Nuggets sign him?
because andre miller was a shell of his old self. and almost singlehandedly lost us the series against GSW with his pathetic defense on curry
well that might be a bit too harsh. but guy was beyond a liability on the defesive end
-
PG, Boonville Jerkoffs
Re: Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?
He's not very good?
Nate can create shots for himself and on a good day, make 7 outta 10. On a bad day, 3 outta 10. He has as many good days as bad days. He also has a nice 3 point shot when left open and.. that's about it.
He does nothing else at an even above-average level. He's a scoring guard who's not an elite or even All-Star level scorer. And I'd argue he's in the in the bottom 5% of defenders for his position.
It's no coincidence that he's been on 6 teams in 9 years.
Guys like him and Nick Young seem to blind people with their 16-17ppg averages. Dig a little deeper and you'll find they shoot 43% and don't do sh!t else to help their teams win
-
Two-Time Oscar MVP
Re: Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?
he just didn't measure up to the rest of the team
-
#Trump4Treason
Re: Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?
the same reason why he bounces around so much. hes not a good locker room guy. he doesnt know when to to make the pass or when to shoot.
-
BEASTING ON YOU BUMZ
Re: Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?
Originally Posted by nathanjizzle
the same reason why he bounces around so much. hes not a good locker room guy. he doesnt know when to to make the pass or when to shoot.
He is ONE DIMENSIONAL and is paid to CHUCK. Nate is a streaky shooting entertaining pg/sg.
-
Serious playground baller
Re: Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?
Sure wish we would of kept him, but our acquisition of Aaron Brooks is going unnoticed by a lot of people. Brooks will be a game changer and is a starting pointguard in this league.
-
Future NBA G.O.A.T
Re: Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?
he was actually good for the bulls since nobody could create their own shot
-
#Dre Day in Sac Town
Re: Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?
Originally Posted by kurple
because andre miller was a shell of his old self. and almost singlehandedly lost us the series against GSW with his pathetic defense on curry
well that might be a bit too harsh. but guy was beyond a liability on the defesive end
Yeah cause Faried didn't get shat on and neither did McGee, had nothing to do with Dre Curry was a man possessed and Iggy was giving away game plans. Robinson was a crap signing considering they already had a small scoring guard in Ty. It's just like the JJ Hickson signing what's the point?
-
Down with GLOBALISM
Re: Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?
Originally Posted by Crystallas
They thought Derrick was going to be healthy. That's it, nothing more.
This.
Historically, Bulls brass will spend money in years they think they will win a championship.
They might be thrifty, but they run a business well and if I was an owner, I'd only spend in years I'm contending also.
Can we stop overrating Nate. He is a good spark off the bench, nothing more.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|