Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    College superstar keep-itreal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    4,718

    Default Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?

    Why didn't they keep him? He was so good he carried the team and beat the nets in the playoffs

  2. #2
    First Kobe fan on ISH JohnFreeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    20,108

    Default Re: Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?

    $$$$$$

  3. #3
    #Dre Day in Sac Town andremiller07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    6,752

    Default Re: Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?

    Why did the Nuggets sign him?

  4. #4
    3-time NBA All-Star kurple's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    10,980

    Default Re: Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnFreeman
    $$$$$$
    because he's making so much in denver?

    2-3 mill a year. for one more year (two total)

  5. #5
    Smile, you're on ISH Crystallas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Land of sunshine
    Posts
    3,624

    Default Re: Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?

    They thought Derrick was going to be healthy. That's it, nothing more.

  6. #6
    3-time NBA All-Star kurple's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    10,980

    Default Re: Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?

    Quote Originally Posted by andremiller07
    Why did the Nuggets sign him?
    because andre miller was a shell of his old self. and almost singlehandedly lost us the series against GSW with his pathetic defense on curry

    well that might be a bit too harsh. but guy was beyond a liability on the defesive end

  7. #7
    PG, Boonville Jerkoffs 32MJ32's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    2 steps ahead..
    Posts
    798

    Default Re: Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?

    He's not very good?

    Nate can create shots for himself and on a good day, make 7 outta 10. On a bad day, 3 outta 10. He has as many good days as bad days. He also has a nice 3 point shot when left open and.. that's about it.

    He does nothing else at an even above-average level. He's a scoring guard who's not an elite or even All-Star level scorer. And I'd argue he's in the in the bottom 5% of defenders for his position.

    It's no coincidence that he's been on 6 teams in 9 years.

    Guys like him and Nick Young seem to blind people with their 16-17ppg averages. Dig a little deeper and you'll find they shoot 43% and don't do sh!t else to help their teams win

  8. #8
    Two-Time Oscar MVP robert de niro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,195

    Default Re: Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?

    he just didn't measure up to the rest of the team

  9. #9
    #Trump4Treason nathanjizzle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    14,705

    Default Re: Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?

    the same reason why he bounces around so much. hes not a good locker room guy. he doesnt know when to to make the pass or when to shoot.

  10. #10
    BEASTING ON YOU BUMZ postmupndunkit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Your girl's place.
    Posts
    351

    Default Re: Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?

    Quote Originally Posted by nathanjizzle
    the same reason why he bounces around so much. hes not a good locker room guy. he doesnt know when to to make the pass or when to shoot.


    He is ONE DIMENSIONAL and is paid to CHUCK. Nate is a streaky shooting entertaining pg/sg.

  11. #11
    Serious playground baller
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    414

    Default Re: Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?

    Sure wish we would of kept him, but our acquisition of Aaron Brooks is going unnoticed by a lot of people. Brooks will be a game changer and is a starting pointguard in this league.

  12. #12
    Future NBA G.O.A.T inclinerator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    12,433

    Default Re: Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?

    he was actually good for the bulls since nobody could create their own shot

  13. #13
    #Dre Day in Sac Town andremiller07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    6,752

    Default Re: Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?

    Quote Originally Posted by kurple
    because andre miller was a shell of his old self. and almost singlehandedly lost us the series against GSW with his pathetic defense on curry

    well that might be a bit too harsh. but guy was beyond a liability on the defesive end
    Yeah cause Faried didn't get shat on and neither did McGee, had nothing to do with Dre Curry was a man possessed and Iggy was giving away game plans. Robinson was a crap signing considering they already had a small scoring guard in Ty. It's just like the JJ Hickson signing what's the point?

  14. #14
    Down with GLOBALISM poido123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    15,576

    Default Re: Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?

    Quote Originally Posted by Crystallas
    They thought Derrick was going to be healthy. That's it, nothing more.

    This.

    Historically, Bulls brass will spend money in years they think they will win a championship.

    They might be thrifty, but they run a business well and if I was an owner, I'd only spend in years I'm contending also.

    Can we stop overrating Nate. He is a good spark off the bench, nothing more.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •