12 reasons why Evolution is impossible

[TheGreatBlaze]

1. Mutations do not produce new purposeful genetic information.

2. Evolution of a new species as a result of new genetic code arising has never been observed.

3. There is no known proven mechanism that can explain how new purposeful genetic information could arise, and statistically it is impossible.

4. There is no known proven mechanism that can explain all the steps for a living cell to form from nonliving molecules (abiogenesis), and statistically it is impossible.

5. Abiogenesis has never been observed and all experiments to initiate it have failed.

6. The fossil record is a record of extinction of fully formed animals and plants --- not a record of the evolution of life forms.

7. There are no fossils of proven mutant evolutionary intermediate organisms, yet there should be millions and millions of fossils of such mutations. That is, we have no evidence of actual evolution in the fossil record.

8. Some of the oldest fossil-bearing rocks contain fully developed advanced animals such as trilobites, with no evidence of evolutionary ancestors.

9. Erosion rates for the continents are too fast for the continents and their fossil content to be old enough for supposed evolution to occur.

10. There are not enough ocean sediments or volcanic deposits for the continents to be old enough to allow for supposed evolution.

11. Radiometric dating results give old ages for recent rocks, so we cannot accurately "know" the age of rocks. Also, the finding of carbon-14 in coal and diamonds means that these deposits must be less than 100,000 years old, indicating insufficient time for supposed evolution.

12. The rate of mutation of DNA currently observed suggests that DNA must be less than 100,000 years old, which is not enough time for supposed evolution.

This list is not exhaustive.

[TheGreatBlaze]

When you realize that Evolution is a dogma that stems from a philosophical presupposition and commitment to scientific naturalism, as well as a moral deflection so people can make their own rules and not be held accountable to God, it's EASY to see why Evolution has taken such a deep grip on society and academia today. After all, without a moral law giver (God) you can justify ANYTHING, because it's basically just your opinion versus someone else's at that point. Without Evolution you are basically admitting we are created beings in a created universe, ergo God you are held accountable to.. Again, it's easy to see why that would ruffle so many peoples feathers, hence why Evolution has taken over as a primary ideology in our society today.

This is an important issue to discuss and the cold facts are out there for people who are sincerely seeking for truth.

[miller-time]

exactly true. evolution is impossible.

[joe]

1. Mutations do not produce new purposeful genetic information.

2. Evolution of a new species as a result of new genetic code arising has never been observed.

3. There is no known proven mechanism that can explain how new purposeful genetic information could arise, and statistically it is impossible.

4. There is no known proven mechanism that can explain all the steps for a living cell to form from nonliving molecules (abiogenesis), and statistically it is impossible.

5. Abiogenesis has never been observed and all experiments to initiate it have failed.

6. The fossil record is a record of extinction of fully formed animals and plants --- not a record of the evolution of life forms.

7. There are no fossils of proven mutant evolutionary intermediate organisms, yet there should be millions and millions of fossils of such mutations. That is, we have no evidence of actual evolution in the fossil record.

8. Some of the oldest fossil-bearing rocks contain fully developed advanced animals such as trilobites, with no evidence of evolutionary ancestors.

9. Erosion rates for the continents are too fast for the continents and their fossil content to be old enough for supposed evolution to occur.

10. There are not enough ocean sediments or volcanic deposits for the continents to be old enough to allow for supposed evolution.

11. Radiometric dating results give old ages for recent rocks, so we cannot accurately "know" the age of rocks. Also, the finding of carbon-14 in coal and diamonds means that these deposits must be less than 100,000 years old, indicating insufficient time for supposed evolution.

12. The rate of mutation of DNA currently observed suggests that DNA must be less than 100,000 years old, which is not enough time for supposed evolution.

This list is not exhaustive.

Make your arguments in further detail with more sources. If you have good anti-evolution arguments bring them on, but to me this list doesn't go into enough details/specifics

[TheGreatBlaze]

Make your arguments in further detail with more sources. If you have good anti-evolution arguments bring them on, but to me this list doesn't go into enough details/specifics

There are many websites you can visit that refute Evolution.

www.icr.org
creation.com
answersingenesis.com
www.creationresearch.org
www.discovery.org/csc/
users.datarealm.com/herrmann/main.html

to name a few

[miller-time]

There are many websites you can visit that refute Evolution.

www.icr.org
creation.com
answersingenesis.com
www.creationresearch.org
www.discovery.org/csc/
users.datarealm.com/herrmann/main.html

to name a few

no you make the arguments. how else do we know if you actually understand what you are copying and pasting? if i wanted to argue with those websites i would email them.

[TheGreatBlaze]

no you make the arguments. how else do we know if you actually understand what you are copying and pasting? if i wanted to argue with those websites i would email them.

He asked for sources so I gave him some. Actual science destroys Evolutionism.

[miller-time]

He asked for sources so I gave him some. Actual science destroys Evolutionism.

he said use sources to back up your argument. not to link to random sources as if we are supposed to do all of your work for you. you brought the topic up so you do the work. the summation of your contribution is copying and pasting someone elses list and providing some links to random creationist websites.

make your argument, cite your examples and then we can talk. you can either keep trolling or you can try to back up your claim - if you believe in it in the first place.

[chains5000]

1. Mutations do not produce new purposeful genetic information.

2. Evolution of a new species as a result of new genetic code arising has never been observed.

3. There is no known proven mechanism that can explain how new purposeful genetic information could arise, and statistically it is impossible.

4. There is no known proven mechanism that can explain all the steps for a living cell to form from nonliving molecules (abiogenesis), and statistically it is impossible.

5. Abiogenesis has never been observed and all experiments to initiate it have failed.

6. The fossil record is a record of extinction of fully formed animals and plants --- not a record of the evolution of life forms.

7. There are no fossils of proven mutant evolutionary intermediate organisms, yet there should be millions and millions of fossils of such mutations. That is, we have no evidence of actual evolution in the fossil record.

8. Some of the oldest fossil-bearing rocks contain fully developed advanced animals such as trilobites, with no evidence of evolutionary ancestors.

9. Erosion rates for the continents are too fast for the continents and their fossil content to be old enough for supposed evolution to occur.

10. There are not enough ocean sediments or volcanic deposits for the continents to be old enough to allow for supposed evolution.

11. Radiometric dating results give old ages for recent rocks, so we cannot accurately "know" the age of rocks. Also, the finding of carbon-14 in coal and diamonds means that these deposits must be less than 100,000 years old, indicating insufficient time for supposed evolution.

12. The rate of mutation of DNA currently observed suggests that DNA must be less than 100,000 years old, which is not enough time for supposed evolution.

This list is not exhaustive.

[oolalaa]

There are many websites you can visit that refute Evolution.

www.icr.org
creation.com
answersingenesis.com
www.creationresearch.org
www.discovery.org/csc/
users.datarealm.com/herrmann/main.html

to name a few

That's a list of clown sources. No one in existence is more dishonest/disingenuous than a bible thumping creationist. Their brains are warped. I don't have to click on the links to tell you that the MAJORITY of their "facts" and "information" are flat out lies. Believe what you want I guess, just don't spout nonsense and falsehoods. It's harmful.

[niko]

1 is false, 2 is false, 7 is false, i don't get the point of 9 or 10 or why they matter or if they make sense, 11 also.

Basically i see some false statements and some which aren't really arguing against evolution.

List is stupid, OP is stupid.

[n00bie]

Sad to say, this guy makes more sense than the Bible.

[RaininTwos]

Sad to say, this guy makes more sense than the Bible.

You clearly haven't read the bible.

[jbot]

i'm not a religious person in the least sense but i do believe that human evolution is false.

[brantonli]

1. Mutations do not produce new purposeful genetic information.

2. Evolution of a new species as a result of new genetic code arising has never been observed.

3. There is no known proven mechanism that can explain how new purposeful genetic information could arise, and statistically it is impossible.

4. There is no known proven mechanism that can explain all the steps for a living cell to form from nonliving molecules (abiogenesis), and statistically it is impossible.

5. Abiogenesis has never been observed and all experiments to initiate it have failed.

6. The fossil record is a record of extinction of fully formed animals and plants --- not a record of the evolution of life forms.

7. There are no fossils of proven mutant evolutionary intermediate organisms, yet there should be millions and millions of fossils of such mutations. That is, we have no evidence of actual evolution in the fossil record.

8. Some of the oldest fossil-bearing rocks contain fully developed advanced animals such as trilobites, with no evidence of evolutionary ancestors.

9. Erosion rates for the continents are too fast for the continents and their fossil content to be old enough for supposed evolution to occur.

10. There are not enough ocean sediments or volcanic deposits for the continents to be old enough to allow for supposed evolution.

11. Radiometric dating results give old ages for recent rocks, so we cannot accurately "know" the age of rocks. Also, the finding of carbon-14 in coal and diamonds means that these deposits must be less than 100,000 years old, indicating insufficient time for supposed evolution.

12. The rate of mutation of DNA currently observed suggests that DNA must be less than 100,000 years old, which is not enough time for supposed evolution.

This list is not exhaustive.

There is one big assumption underlying all of these arguments:

We have exhausted all evidence possible from the Earth.

Which is patently ridiculous. We have barely scratched the surface of Earth's history, and somehow you expect that about 300 years of excavation is enough to say 'Ok, not enough evidence, hence evolution cannot exist!'