More agressive, doesn't take nights off on offense, doesn't over dribble as much, doesn't overpass, just a really good balance at pg and most of all he can run the offense and be a part of it without dominating the ball the way paul does.
Yeahhhh we all kinda know Ty Lawson's not as good as Chris Paul, though.
I'd rather have George Karl than Vinny Del Negro.
I'd probably also rather have the other eleven Nuggets than the other eleven Clippers.
The PG position is really stacked right now, so Lawson doesn't rank too high on that list. He's a real good player, though. He could be the next Tony Parker if he keeps improving and things go well.
Right now, I'd stick with Ty over Cp3. Cp3 is the better player, but I think Ty works really well in our system. Ty is also only 25, still has a couple of years before he reaches his prime. Cp3 is already there IMO.
chris paul sucks like hes not even as good as john wall at this point...speed and athleticism is crucial to succeeding in the league, cp3 is losing both at rapid paces and hes not even 30....his career is over.
chris paul sucks like hes not even as good as john wall at this point...speed and athleticism is crucial to succeeding in the league, cp3 is losing both at rapid paces and hes not even 30....his career is over.
i wouldn't say all of that...he's just too passive...passive to a fault.
I think we gotta put CP3's "Best PG" card aside for a few weeks til he actually performs like a superstar and outplays other elite PGs and gets his team the W.
He got destroyed by Parker, owned by Westbrook, now Lawson is having his way vs him. Lets not forget he was 1st team all NBA and 1st team all D last year, probably will make it this year as well based on reputation. But can anyone honestly say he has been performing like that guy for the past 5 or so games?
We gotta judge him just like any other player, overlooking his inablity to contain his competition at PG isn't fair to those who outplay him.