Top 10 players all-time to start a franchise?

[SamuraiSWISH]

People missing the part where I said entertainment value. I was being generous even leaving boring Tim Duncan on my list. I should've put McGrady or Iverson in there.

[ArbitraryWater]

You even know what obvious trolling is?

You're trying WAY too hard to "catch me". Surely I can't bother you this badly?

Sure.. I was just assuming you'd prefer to mention the "outplaying" happened in the NCAA.

[Heavincent]

People missing the part where I said entertainment value. I was being generous even leaving boring Tim Duncan on my list. I should've put McGrady or Iverson in there.

Multiple titles aren't entertaining?

[ArbitraryWater]

People missing the part where I said entertainment value. I was being generous even leaving boring Tim Duncan on my list. I should've put McGrady or Iverson in there.

If you're using that as an excuse, you're obviously placing value where it doesn't belong... This isn't a diving contest.

And your criteria

Duncan beats Rose in peak play, longevity, playoff performance, winning gene....

Yet somehow Rose is placed above him due to the most meaningless selection "entertainment value" ?

dat entertainment value power

[Milbuck]

Sure.. I was just assuming you'd prefer to mention the "outplaying" happened in the NCAA.

The **** are you even talking about? Do you know what "obvious trolling" means?

[kshutts1]

1) MJ
2) LeBron
3) Wade
4) Kobe
5) D. Rose

6) Shaq
7) Garnett
8) Duncan
9) C. Paul
10) Hakeem

I'm basing my choices off peak play, longevity, playoff performance, winning gene and entertainment value.

I'm assuming those two are troll attempts. Please tell me they're troll attempts.

[ArbitraryWater]

The **** are you even talking about? Do you know what "obvious trolling" means?

All those emoticons and you're still not happy..

[Milbuck]

All those emoticons and you're still not happy..

Far from it, I'm amused. All these attempts to "expose" me and not one has landed. Nice try, nice effort

[ArbitraryWater]

Far from it, I'm amused. All these attempts to "expose" me and not one has landed. Nice try, nice effort

Its getting kind of sad when you yourself have to pride yourself with "winning arguments" when no one even talks about it... You're here again playing your winning, confident shtick... "you always try to come at me, BUT NO ONE HAS LANDED DOE!! IM UNTOUCHABLE"



Okay, carry on... need more emoticons.

[Milbuck]

Its getting kind of sad when you yourself have to pride yourself with "winning arguments" when no one even talks about it... You're here again playing your winning, confident shtick... "you always try to come at me, BUT NO ONE HAS LANDED DOE!! IM UNTOUCHABLE"



Okay, carry on... need more emoticons.

Didn't read. Keep responding.

[ArbitraryWater]

Didn't read. Keep responding.

This is all you have? the "didn't read" one?

okay.. you don't seem bothered at all.. but milbuck winning doe!!

[Milbuck]

This is all you have? the "didn't read" one?

okay.. you don't seem bothered at all.. but milbuck winning doe!!

Good. Another response please.

[SamuraiSWISH]

Multiple titles aren't entertaining?

If I was a GM I could've got the entertainment, non bore factor of Tim Duncan by drafting McGrady, Iverson, or D-Rose and still produced titles. I would surround them with better pieces to complete the puzzle.

If Hill didn't get hurt, McGrady wouldn't have had the bums Orlando surrounded with ... probably would've been battling it out with the Lakers in the Finals those seasons.

Ex: If McGrady, Iverson, Ray Allen, or VC were on the 2000 - 2002 Lakers in place of Kobe they would've got titles.

Hell 3rd year D-Wade took past his prime Shaq to the promise land, and that guy was a SHELL of what he was at his peak from '98 - 2002.