The case against fraud and sham commited by member Shade8780

[Fire Colangelo]

The **** did I just read lol...

To bring international law for a ****ing avy bet? man up and honour your bet. It's an avatar on an online forum, who gives a shit?

[kNIOKAS]

We get it kNIOKAS-

You made a bet
You lost the bet

Some time passed and now your claiming a statute of limitations that does not exist on ISH.

You are a man of little to no honor or self-respect.

May the ISH Gods forever piss on your e-soul

It does exist, and I am the trailblazer who is to bring civilization to ISH. America wasn't built on lawlessness, neither could the online forum like this. You cannot forfeit the power of a civil society by merely claiming it does not exist. It will son, you bet your worst it will

[DonDadda59]

Shade = The Teflon Don. His goons got goons.

[Bosnian Sajo]

Wooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww, op is a bitch forreal. Who the hell gets that upset over an avatar bet?

[Knicks101]

OP getting negged into oblivion when rep comes back.

[ArbitraryWater]

Just touched down in Shade's country

[Bandito]

There's only one way to solve this mess.


Kniokas and Shade must 69 one another, each placing their d*cks in the other's mouths. This is the only way this can work.



Take pictures of this event gentlemen and post it here

I agree with this

[Bandito]

But he agree to a period of one month. He didn't agree to anything else. The month passed so that was that.

He played technicality against shade.

[Shade8780]

I offered him the deal of one month of wearing the avy. He accepted it. I offered the deal, not him, and as far as I'm concerned, there was no deadline to when I could give him the avy.

go fk yourself.

[Alamо]

OP getting negged into oblivion when rep comes back.

This

[warriorfan]

[ballup]

All rise for judge ballup. You all may now sit.

After reviewing both the prosecution's and the defenses' claims, I have made a sound decision. There are multiple claims and testimonies that the user we call shade was still present on ISH during his ban. The court finds these claims to be truth. The original bet does not include any indication of a start date. There is no disbute over the record of the original betting quotes either. Thus, there is no limit as to when the payout can be taken.

The defendant must adhere to the avy bet. The court also demands that once this has been done, the prosecution and affiliates must cease badgering the defendant. If the defendant does not meet the requirements, the court shall motion the request to brand him as "fvckboi".

This case is dismissed

[Batzman]

shut it down.

[kNIOKAS]

All rise for judge ballup. You all may now sit.

After reviewing both the prosecution's and the defenses' claims, I have made a sound decision. There are multiple claims and testimonies that the user we call shade was still present on ISH during his ban. The court finds these claims to be truth. The original bet does not include any indication of a start date. There is no disbute over the record of the original betting quotes either. Thus, there is no limit as to when the payout can be taken.

The defendant must adhere to the avy bet. The court also demands that once this has been done, the prosecution and affiliates must cease badgering the defendant. If the defendant does not meet the requirements, the court shall motion the request to brand him as "fvckboi".

This case is dismissed

Ur hn,


I want to point out the contradictionary premises of the verdict.


1) Under what evidence it is proved that the spoken member Shade8780 was on the forum during his ban? The presented evidence Exhibit B shows that identity cannot be identified by the best of the experts.

2) If the spoken member Shade8780 was present during his ban, why did he postpone claiming the bet? The fact that he willingly did not collect the winnings makes him eligible for the negligence and dishonouring the bet.

3) It is stated that Shade8780 was actually present during his ban. If assumed so, does that not put Shade8780 responsible of trespassing and avoiding his official duty of obeying the law, thus staying away from ISH until ban expires? Why would kNIOKAS then honour the bet with a person that has no honour himself? The reciprocacy principle is the essence of a lawful system.

I will be looking to appeal the verdict when I get an answer from Ur Hn.

[Shade8780]

this case is dismissed fgt you lost