Evolution is wrong

[DonD13]

1. He said a bear can turn into a whale under the right conditions. Maybe you don't know much about Darwin but that was exactly what he said.

http://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co....revisited.html

2. He said in the struggle for survival the ones that win out are the ones that are the best at adapting to their environment. You're just arguing semantics. I've already clearly mentioned adaptation many times in my other posts.

1.

2. but... but you said it's not plausible because humans "are weak compare to apes, bears, big cats, etc"

let's just hope you don't produce any offsprings mate

[IamRAMBO24]

Obviously you don't read what you reply to.

You were talking about predator ostriches that can rule the world. WTF does that have to do with anything? I already told you humans are the most dominant species because they are the opposite of Darwin's theory: they're not passively adapting to the environment in order to survive; they are actively manipulating it. If the dinosaurs lived with men, they would dominate them as well. It is not the fittest who will survive, it is the most intelligent.

[Lebowsky]

I will never understand why people waste time replying to this retarded troll...

[IamRAMBO24]

1.

2. but... but you said it's not plausible because humans "are weak compare to apes, bears, big cats, etc"

let's just hope you don't produce any offsprings mate

If Darwin's theory is correct (adaptation to the environment), humans should of retained their ape-like strength and passed it on to their off springs since we are the most dominant specie, but we are not doing that because we are not evolving based on adaption to the environment; we are evolving based on purely mind. The best ideas in technology and science are moving us forward. Evolution only works for animals.

[DonD13]

If Darwin's theory is correct (adaptation to the environment), humans should of retained their ape-like strength and passed it on to their off springs since we are the most dominant specie, but we are not doing that because we are not evolving based on adaption to the environment; we are evolving based on purely mind. The best ideas in technology and science are moving us forward. Evolution only works for animals.

what? i don't think there's anybody questioning that the key why humans are so successful is their intelligence

you came up with this "strength" thing, not Darwin.

you just making shit up

[dunksby]

The only thing that separates us from most mammals is a 1.4 percent regulatory genes that dictate the placement and proportion of organs during the embryonic growth. These regulatory genes direct when genes are turned on and off during the embryo's development and consequently changing the size and placement of body organs and limbs. Basically we share a lot with other animals because we have all evolved to survive in the same environment, all animals need oxygen to survive, eat from their surroundings, sexual reproduction for some etc.

[Overdrive]

You were talking about predator ostriches that can rule the world. WTF does that have to do with anything? I already told you humans are the most dominant species because they are the opposite of Darwin's theory: they're not passively adapting to the environment in order to survive; they are actively manipulating it. If the dinosaurs lived with men, they would dominate them as well. It is not the fittest who will survive, it is the most intelligent.

There actually was a big non flying top of the food chain prime predator bird for millions of years. It died out long before men reached their territory. Endemic non avid species overtook. No catastrophes were involved. How come?

[ThePhantomCreep]

If Darwin's theory is correct (adaptation to the environment), humans should of retained their ape-like strength and passed it on to their off springs since we are the most dominant specie, but we are not doing that because we are not evolving based on adaption to the environment; we are evolving based on purely mind. The best ideas in technology and science are moving us forward. Evolution only works for animals.

Not necessarily. Human brainpower and the use of tools make ape-like muscle density (which requires enormous amounts of food to maintain) more trouble than its worth.

You think evolution is disproven because we can't snap trees like toothpicks?

[Sarcastic]

How do you know humans can evolve into bears within a million of years?

No one does, but it takes a lot longer than that. The scale of time is even larger than you can even fathom, and that's probably the biggest problem.

[ILLsmak]

Evolution is wrong in the same way a lot of science is wrong. It takes something true and goes way too far with it.

obviously things evolved and the world changed, but the truth is that I don't agree 'good mutations' could happen on that level. I mean, the whole statistical idea of it is basically if you ran the same thing infinitely it would eventually happen. The world would be created, bad evolution would happen, everything would die. The world would be created again, etc. But the issue, to me, is that there are insurmountable odds.

Seems just as likely that a godbeing could have evolved, something outside of the sphere of this creation and destruction, because it was lucky or immune, then it influenced the world in its next stages.

If creationism is believing there is unexplainable shit that happened in order for the earth to get to this point, then mark me down as one.

-Smak

[GimmeThat]

what's wrong, is the lack of ability for human to interpret the currency as gold or silver

[eriX]

When is rambo going to accept he is just going to rot away, posting shiet on ISH where no fks were given and people like Darwin will be remembered for centuries to come.

Dat feel.

[Lebron23]

[Take Your Lumps]

1. Darwin believes a species can evolve into another species given the right environment, so for example, a bear can evolve into a whale if the conditions are such he has to be a whale to survive.

Lol

[riseagainst]

OP is the most ignorant poster on this site. He thinks he actually knows science when he states the most retarded, extreme conclusions. Wow, should have stayed in school and paid attention, kid.