ISH Vote #4: Top 20 Players in the NBA

[Deuce Bigalow]

What did I say that was wrong? And stop derailing my thread

Free throw % is PART of efficiency

[TheNaturalWR]

No way in hell. Kobe averaged more points, rebounds, and assists, and was far more important to his team. The only thing Wade had on Kobe was FG% because he was getting spoon fed by Lebron and cherry picked like a mother****er. Not to mention Kobe is a much better shooter and is more skilled.

Wade might not even be the second most important player on his team. Bosh was arguably more important during the playoffs.

How many playoff games did Kobe throw away? Like 3?

[AlonzoGOAT]

CP3

[Freedom Kid7]

Chris Paul. It was strange to watch him dismantle that Grizzly team.

[RRR3]

lebron
durant
dwight
cp3
kobe
westbrook
melo
the rest

this is how its gonna turn out

Are you voting for CP3?

[KG215]

thats cherry picking dude. take westbrook off the floor and the thunder don't get past the lakers either.

I think they do. I think Durant does and means more to the Thunder than Westbrook. I think without Westbrook, the Thunder still beat the Lakers in 6 or 7.

[Deuce Bigalow]

I think they do. I think Durant does and means more to the Thunder than Westbrook. I think without Westbrook, the Thunder still beat the Lakers in 6 or 7.

[DirtySanchez]

Kobe over Cp3 you guys are tripping

[KG215]

Nice rebuttal. I mean you were so eloquent and knowledgeable in your response of why you disagreed. At least you didn't resort to the ISH go-to immature "I don't agree with you" response of a bunch of emoticons.

I understand the importance of Westbrook to the Thunder. I'm an OKC fan. I watch the vast majority of their games. But I think the current Thunder team would have a better chance of making the WCF with Durant and no Westbrook, than they would with Westbrook and no Durant.

[riseagainst]

Nice rebuttal. I mean you were so eloquent and knowledgeable in your why you disagreed. At least you didn't resort to the ISH go-to immature "I don't agree with you" response of a bunch of emoticons.

Originally Posted by KG215
I think they do. I think Durant does and means more to the Thunder than Westbrook. I think without Westbrook, the Thunder still beat the Lakers in 6 or 7.

those emoticons are nothing different than what you typed in. What you essentially typed in was just a statement of your own opinion with no facts to back it up. Deuce's emoticons are basically saying you are wrong with no listed facts to back it up.

Anyway the Thunder without Westbrook wouldn't have gotten past the Lakers. but even by some miracle they did, they would've gotten swept easily by the Heat.






Oh and I vote for Rondo again.

[Deuce Bigalow]

Nice rebuttal. I mean you were so eloquent and knowledgeable in your response of why you disagreed. At least you didn't resort to the ISH go-to immature "I don't agree with you" response of a bunch of emoticons.

I understand the importance of Westbrook to the Thunder. I'm an OKC fan. I watch the vast majority of their games. But I think the current Thunder team would have a better chance of making the WCF with Durant and no Westbrook, than they would with Westbrook and no Durant.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZyhTQibk2k

Now let me express my reaction again

I watched that series as a Laker fan. First 3 quarters he was easily the best Thunder player.

[LongLiveTheKing]

CP3

[KOBE143]

The top 3 ranking sucks.. Kobe should be #1 or at least top 3..

[KG215]

those emoticons are nothing different than what you typed in. What you essentially typed in was just a statement of your own opinion with no facts to back it up. Deuce's emoticons are basically saying you are wrong with no listed facts to back it up.

Anyway the Thunder without Westbrook wouldn't have gotten past the Lakers. but even by some miracle they did, they would've gotten swept easily by the Heat.


Oh and I vote for Rondo again.

Right, but at least make it worth my while by telling me why you don't agree. I could do what the worst stans do by handpicking a stat or two that makes my argument look good while ignoring context.

Of course it's an opinionated statement. 99% of what is posted on ISH is opinionated. The entire premise of this thread is opinion based. No one can factually 100% prove Durant is better than Howard and Paul.

[KG215]

The top 3 ranking sucks.. Kobe should be #1 or at least top 3..

Why? What possible argument does have for #1? He doesn't even have an argument for top 3 in my opinion, but what could you possible use for evidence as to why he's currently the best player in the NBA?