State Department reopens Clinton emails probe

[UK2K]

DEVELOPING: The State Department is reopening an internal investigation of possible mishandling of classified information by Hillary Clinton and top aides.

Spokesman John Kirby says the emails probe is restarting now that the Justice Department isn't pursuing a criminal prosecution. The State Department suspended its review in April to avoid interfering with the FBI's inquiry.

Kirby set no deadline for the investigation's completion.

Clinton was secretary of state until early 2013. Most of her top advisers left shortly thereafter.

But Kirby said this week former officials can still face "administrative sanctions." The most serious is loss of security clearances, which could complicate Clinton's naming of a national security team if she becomes president.

Paul Ryan asked that her clearance be revoked. While not a criminal investigation, there's zero doubt her clearance needs to be revoked given her 'extremely careless' handling of classified documents in the past.

Should be interesting. A president that can't sit in on presidential meetings.

[DonDadda59]

[TheMan]

Lol, another probe that'll go nowhere and we'll foot the bill.

I thought conservatives were against wasteful spending

[DonDadda59]

Lol, another probe that'll go nowhere and we'll foot the bill.

I thought conservatives were againat wasteful spending

They never learn

Countless hearings, probes, investigations, impeachments, etc over a quarter of a century aimed at taking down the Clinton dynasty and what do they have to show for it besides bright red, sore asses?

And what happens in November once the wild goose chased becomes the wild goose chaser?

[Patrick Chewing]

I think she's cooked already. She was already exposed today as an awful liar. She lied to the families of the Benghazi victims. She lies about income inequality. She lies all the time and I think it's finally caught up to her.


No sane person can vote for her, and thankfully the sane outnumber the insane.

[poido123]

I think she's cooked already. She was already exposed today as an awful liar. She lied to the families of the Benghazi victims. She lies about income inequality. She lies all the time and I think it's finally caught up to her.


No sane person can vote for her, and thankfully the sane outnumber the insane.

I hope so.


Clinton is evil. Trump is just an egotistic buffoon and a lot less harmless than this witch.

[DonDadda59]

I think she's cooked already. She was already exposed today as an awful liar. She lied to the families of the Benghazi victims. She lies about income inequality. She lies all the time and I think it's finally caught up to her.


No sane person can vote for her, and thankfully the sane outnumber the insane.

Latest polls have her up 9-11 points Nationally, up 30 points in California, winning in all the swing states, and with Grand Canyon size gaps in Black/Latio votes.

But other than that... Looking good for keeping you alive.

[Doomsday Dallas]

[poido123]

Latest polls have her up 9-11 points Nationally, up 30 points in California, winning in all the swing states, and with Grand Canyon size gaps in Black/Latio votes.

But other than that... Looking good for keeping you alive.

Those polls are bullshit and you will find out why when the election comes.

[Jameerthefear]

Those polls are bullshit and you will find out why when the election comes.

why?

[TheMan]

Those polls are bullshit and you will find out why when the election comes.

Here we go again

Didn't you morons not learn ANYTHING after Obama vs Romney

Again with ignoring the polls that don't favor your candidate because it turns out we wrong...oh wait

[DonDadda59]

Those polls are bullshit and you will find out why when the election comes.

Finally figured out Poido's real life persona.



Ready for Round 2, Karl?

[poido123]

why?

They are left leaning polls distorted by many factors.


Election polls only sample a miniscule portion of the electorate.


Here's an article that explains it:

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/20...he-new-machine

A 2013 study—a poll—found that three out of four Americans suspect polls of bias. Presumably, there was far greater distrust among the people who refused to take the survey.


"Election pollsters sample only a minuscule portion of the electorate, not uncommonly something on the order of a couple of thousand people out of the more than two hundred million Americans who are eligible to vote. The promise of this work is that the sample is exquisitely representative. But the lower the response rate the harder and more expensive it becomes to realize that promise, which requires both calling many more people and trying to correct for “non-response bias” by giving greater weight to the answers of people from demographic groups that are less likely to respond."

"Not everyone uses the Internet, and, at the moment, the people who do, and who complete online surveys, are younger and leftier than people who don’t, while people who have landlines, and who answer the phone, are older and more conservative than people who don’t. Some pollsters, both here and around the world, rely on a combination of telephone and Internet polling; the trick is to figure out just the right mix. So far, it isn’t working. In Israel this March, polls failed to predict Benjamin Netanyahu’s victory. In May in the U.K., every major national poll failed to forecast the Conservative Party’s win."


So, you have non-answering bias factors and people who simply don't own a landline anymore.


How can you possibly get accurate results from polls when you have this many factors affecting the poll? And when you have a growing number of pollsters using the internet in their polls(which lean towards the LEFT), then how is that going to reflect the ACTUAL voter base?


Truth is, the Polls are very heavily in favour of the left or essentially the democrats because pollsters are now growing in number on the internet.


POLLING IN TODAY'S POLITICAL CLIMATE IS USED AS A BRAINWASHING TOOL TO CONVINCE THOSE THEY ARE BACKING A WINNER.

[TheMan]

Finally figured out Poido's real life persona.



Ready for Round 2, Karl?

It's like these dudes are total political noobs and don't understand US electoral elections. They have no grasp on how much minorities (among other voting blocs), get out the vote, ground game can affect who wins what states and what not.

TRUMP HAS NO SHOT

[TheMan]

[QUOTE=poido123]They are left leaning polls distorted by many factors.


Election polls only sample a miniscule portion of the electorate.


Here's an article that explains it:

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/20...he-new-machine

A 2013 study