Can someone explain to me how having randolph would be much different than having SAR?
Both of them:
-Have an inside/outside game
-Can take the J
-Like to get lots of touches on Offensive
-Underacheive Defensively
-Cause double teams in the post
If anything Randoplh is worse:
-Bigger contract
-Off the court issues
-Not a leader/chemistry type of guy
For all those talking about sacramento being a rehab center for "hated" players like Randolph, Cwebb, artest, etc. I disagree, because that was the old kings. Adelman turnes hated players into loved ones because his system was so easy and free. Every player got lots of freedom and opportunties on offense, so it was ez. Im not saying that that trend won't continue with the new coach, but I am drawing attention to the fact that times have changed
For all those talking about sacramento being a rehab center for "hated" players like Randolph, Cwebb, artest, etc. I disagree, because that was the old kings. Adelman turnes hated players into loved ones because his system was so easy and free. Every player got lots of freedom and opportunties on offense, so it was ez. Im not saying that that trend won't continue with the new coach, but I am drawing attention to the fact that times have changed
You are probably right, it might be Adelman. I would rather have Foster too because we already have SAR, I just disagree that Zach is a loser. Bonzi, D.Stoudemire, Rasheed all came from Portland and all have been doing well since leaving. I think Randolph would be better with a change of scenery.
You are probably right, it might be Adelman. I would rather have Foster too because we already have SAR, I just disagree that Zach is a loser. Bonzi, D.Stoudemire, Rasheed all came from Portland and all have been doing well since leaving. I think Randolph would be better with a change of scenery.
Why is there an "L" in zach's name? It feels wierd typing it every time.
Zach could use a change of scenery.
I was thinking today about how great Kenny Thomas would fit into the nuggets system. He would be a nice offensive minded player to complement camby. He is not injury prown and would provide some depth at SF, if the nuggs wanted to play big. His jump shooting could be used when Anthony, Martin, or Nene get doubled in the post. He can run as well as any PF in the league, so a high tempo offense would suit him.
Can someone explain to me how having randolph would be much different than having SAR?
Both of them:
-Have an inside/outside game
-Can take the J
-Like to get lots of touches on Offensive
-Underacheive Defensively
-Cause double teams in the post
If anything Randoplh is worse:
-Bigger contract
-Off the court issues
-Not a leader/chemistry type of guy
For all those talking about sacramento being a rehab center for "hated" players like Randolph, Cwebb, artest, etc. I disagree, because that was the old kings. Adelman turnes hated players into loved ones because his system was so easy and free. Every player got lots of freedom and opportunties on offense, so it was ez. Im not saying that that trend won't continue with the new coach, but I am drawing attention to the fact that times have changed
I don't like SAR's defense but it is a lot better than Randolph's. Randolph plays 0 defense at all. SAR is also faster, in better shape, and much more athletic(even though he's not actually that athletic).
Dating back to the Kenny for Foster trade, I'd be down for that.
I just like how Foster brings solid rebounding and Hustle. He's a big body, I don't know much about his interior defense, but I DO know about Kenny Thomas' interior D, .
I like Shareef coming off the bench, it just gives our bench a solid scoring punch, that scores downlow. When we were playing Dallas, I could see we were trying to corporate Kenny in the low post and try to face up his man and beat him off the dribble. Didn't happen often, but it was early in the first quarter.
point blank....foster is better than kenny...if foster comes he is the automactic starter...and i kno SAR would understand the teams stra. ..... SAR knows he's better than foster but we really need fosters in game rebounding ability and SAR knows he is the Xfactor on the kings team.... and i feel SAR would be much more comfortable comin off the bench..now because he knows he's better than foster......but it has to be a reason for us to have him on the bench..... and we'll express to him how much he is needed to fill that bench role...then we'll draw reff. to bobby jackson if it wasnt for him...blah blah blah..etc. PLEASE FOSTER COME SAVE US
Just playing around with the fantasy, Would Brad play the 4? The 5? Or would Foster play the 4 or 5?
I think Foster played some 4 last season while JO was out and Harrison/Pollard played 5 but I'm not sure. He's not a high jumper but he's pretty tough and mobile.
I the telling truthest....
.
Dancing on the corpses...
