#7 NBA Player Of All-Time According to InsideHoops

[thelucifer69]

Shaq

[Kews1]

Duncan

[KOBE143]

what the f*ck is wrong with this forum

shaq and duncan over kobe bryant?

this forum is a big man loving sack of S***


kobe has

more rings

more all nba first teams

more defensive first teams

more stats

more skills

more records

more clutch shots

more 20,30,40,50,60,80 point games

its harder to achive success as a guard AND HE HAS MORE OF IT THAN BOTH GUYS

a longer prime

a longer peak

more fans

more impact on the game

more haters

its NOT EVEN CLOSE


kobe bryant won player of the decade for the 2000's by SI, sporting news and TNT


WHAT THE FFFFFFFFFFFFFF*CK

I feel your pain dude.. Kobe at worst is top 5 for me..

[KG215]

only after every single big man that ever won a title makes it LOL
ISH =

And two other guards and a SF. Kobe will make the top 10. Belive it or not, it's not some huge travesty he's not going to be voted in at #7.

[ThunderStruk022]

Duncan

[kennethgriffin]

And two other guards and a SF. Kobe will make the top 10. Belive it or not, it's not some huge travesty he's not going to be voted in at #7.

no... it is...

its like saying... its ok if wilt or bird is top 10

its not... and kobe is on their level

[Hands of Iron]

He will. This is how he matches up with Bird.

I think people consider a little more than accolades alone, but even considering only the accolades there's no doubt people are giving Kobe the 2-option treatment despite being Elite by 2000-01 for his first three titles, with the two more satisfying ones being 2009-2010. A lot of people place huge emphasis on the MVP's as well.

I think Kobe would've won titles regardless with a servicable cast, but his individual numbers wouldn't suffer as they do having played with Shaq from 1997-2004 and coming off the bench the first two seasons. A lot of potential 30+ ppg seasons down the drain.

[Suckafree]

Shaqovich

[KG215]

no... it is...

its like saying... its ok if wilt or bird is top 10

its not... and kobe is on their level

And, arguably, so are Shaq, Duncan, and even Hakeem. Don't throw your "resume" argument out at me, because at their peak those three were more dominant than Kobe at his peak; not by a wide margin or anything, I just happen to think their peak was better than Kobe's.

To me, you could vote any of Shaq, Duncan, Kobe, and Hakeem at #7 and I wouldn't have a problem with it; but you bitching about Kobe not being at #7 like it's some huge disservice does nothing but show your extreme Kobe bias.

[AlonzoGOAT]

I feel your pain dude.. Kobe at worst is top 5 for me..

You're 14 dumbass you haven't lived to see more then half of these players you dumb nikka stop talking like you have any credibility

[AK47DR91]

Shaq

[AlonzoGOAT]

Forgot to vote. I vote Shaq

[jalbert009]

Shaq

[Horatio33]

Tim Duncan.

Can't believe Shaq is top ten. Amazing peak. But could and should have been so much better.

[Deuce Bigalow]

Tim Duncan.

Can't believe Shaq is top ten. Amazing peak. But could and should have been so much better.

Can't believe...as in he doesn't belong in the top 10?