-
Re: Russia bans Pornhub and YouPorn
so they want their patients to bypass the registry lobby and go directly to their specialist
not that the russians would be monitoring internet behavior or anything like that
-
Re: Russia bans Pornhub and YouPorn
Is this guy a bot^
Nothing he says ever makes any goddamn sense.
-
Re: Russia bans Pornhub and YouPorn
Originally Posted by Schotsman
So decisions should never be based on feelings? BS.
My mistake.
A more appropriate word would have been instantly gratifying vice
The images conjured in my head range from mothers feeding their children candy to father's playing cards while their kids are losing interest in school.
utilitarianism advocating maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain is still principally sound but it needs an additional layer to reconcile moral relativism and grant human beings dignity in that they are more than
That which feels right in one's heart, that which is the most sound judgment, that which is most effective, and ethically correct all should ideally be that which conforms most to Allah's will.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Russia bans Pornhub and YouPorn
Originally Posted by Dresta
Not surprising to see the degenerates of ISHs come out all outraged about any country daring to pass any restriction on their beloved pornography. TheMan actually has a wife and still wanks to porn. Talk about having no self-control or self-discipline (or self-respect) whatsoever.
I don't think we should be putting people on trial for watching pornography, but it's becoming pretty evident that it is something of a scourge when it comes to relationships, sex, love, and all the finer human feelings. It ought to be discouraged and stigmatised. No person who treats other people like a commercial product, simply to be consumed, can think well of himself if he has any kind of conscience; as a result, to justify their perversions, the same people end up mocking and ridiculing genuine intimacy, which makes them feel increasingly uncomfortable expressing it themselves. A decline in intimacy must accompany the proliferation of pornography.
-
It is what it is
Re: Russia bans Pornhub and YouPorn
Originally Posted by Dresta
Not surprising to see the degenerates of ISHs come out all outraged about any country daring to pass any restriction on their beloved pornography. TheMan actually has a wife and still wanks to porn. Talk about having no self-control or self-discipline (or self-respect) whatsoever.
I don't think we should be putting people on trial for watching pornography, but it's becoming pretty evident that it is something of a scourge when it comes to relationships, sex, love, and all the finer human feelings. It ought to be discouraged and stigmatised. No person who treats other people like a commercial product, simply to be consumed, can think well of himself if he has any kind of conscience; as a result, to justify their perversions, the same people end up mocking and ridiculing genuine intimacy, which makes them feel increasingly uncomfortable expressing it themselves. A decline in intimacy must accompany the proliferation of pornography.
So anyone who watches porn is a degenerate.
Good to know that
-
It is what it is
Re: Russia bans Pornhub and YouPorn
Originally Posted by HarryBergeron
Americans=/=America
Jeff & Steve =/= All Americans
Use =/= Endorsement of owners
I could go on and on, but you get the point.
Interesting fact; Mexico is the only nation fatter than America.
I'm 5'10" and weigh 170, my wife is 5'4" and weighs 120 and my kids aren't fat
Nice try though.
-
Re: Russia bans Pornhub and YouPorn
Originally Posted by Dresta
Not surprising to see the degenerates of ISHs come out all outraged about any country daring to pass any restriction on their beloved pornography. TheMan actually has a wife and still wanks to porn. Talk about having no self-control or self-discipline (or self-respect) whatsoever.
I don't think we should be putting people on trial for watching pornography, but it's becoming pretty evident that it is something of a scourge when it comes to relationships, sex, love, and all the finer human feelings. It ought to be discouraged and stigmatised. No person who treats other people like a commercial product, simply to be consumed, can think well of himself if he has any kind of conscience; as a result, to justify their perversions, the same people end up mocking and ridiculing genuine intimacy, which makes them feel increasingly uncomfortable expressing it themselves. A decline in intimacy must accompany the proliferation of pornography.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Russia bans Pornhub and YouPorn
they haven't banned Crack-babe ... and for good reason...
-
NBA sixth man of the year
Re: Russia bans Pornhub and YouPorn
Originally Posted by JEFFERSON MONEY
Russians are real Orthodox Christians and know the importance of family. That means taking away things that screw up male fertility. They should kick the booze to the curb too ideally (they already look down on microwave usage)
China/Iran/NK have a level of discipline, that if Latinos and Americans were to integrate in their lives; they'd ascend to the top in achievement once again.
In what world are those countries top in achievement? There's a large difference between personal discipline and I will be murdered by my government if I don't do this.
Dresta continues to believe his personal opinions are universal truths.
-
Re: Russia bans Pornhub and YouPorn
Originally Posted by TheMan
I'm 5'10" and weigh 170, my wife is 5'4" and weighs 120 and my kids aren't fat
Nice try though.
Yeah, just ignore all the other points i was making you obese, burrito lover.
-
Not airballing my layups anymore
Re: Russia bans Pornhub and YouPorn
Originally Posted by JEFFERSON MONEY
My mistake.
A more appropriate word would have been instantly gratifying vice
The images conjured in my head range from mothers feeding their children candy to father's playing cards while their kids are losing interest in school.
utilitarianism advocating maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain is still principally sound but it needs an additional layer to reconcile moral relativism and grant human beings dignity in that they are more than
That which feels right in one's heart, that which is the most sound judgment, that which is most effective, and ethically correct all should ideally be that which conforms most to Allah's will.
This sounds a lot more reasonable than what you first said.
-
Re: Russia bans Pornhub and YouPorn
Originally Posted by Dresta
Not surprising to see the degenerates of ISHs come out all outraged about any country daring to pass any restriction on their beloved pornography. TheMan actually has a wife and still wanks to porn. Talk about having no self-control or self-discipline (or self-respect) whatsoever.
I don't think we should be putting people on trial for watching pornography, but it's becoming pretty evident that it is something of a scourge when it comes to relationships, sex, love, and all the finer human feelings. It ought to be discouraged and stigmatised. No person who treats other people like a commercial product, simply to be consumed, can think well of himself if he has any kind of conscience; as a result, to justify their perversions, the same people end up mocking and ridiculing genuine intimacy, which makes them feel increasingly uncomfortable expressing it themselves. A decline in intimacy must accompany the proliferation of pornography.
Could you elaborate further on this? This was a genuinely interesting post.
I think porn is adding to the uptrend in hedonistic and empty pursuits we see in our society.It can't be healthy to go from meaningless sexual encounter to the next. I think pornstars will always struggle to be taken seriously post porn career and for the most part will live a life of regret.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Russia bans Pornhub and YouPorn
Originally Posted by Dresta
The answer to that is yes: John Randolph did it plenty, and he was an invalid. What's more, his slaves saw him as their patron and protector, and he slept with no security, with his small log-cabin door left wide open. He took no precautions for his safety, nor to prevent runaways, and yet his slaves remained obedient and devoted to him--with good reason. This is what happened to them after his death:
http://hubpages.com/politics/Born-A-...rginia-to-Ohio
And that's the same reason why he didn't free his slaves until his death (they would be turned loose into a world that despised them with no protection from abuse and injustice); and he tried to lessen this by buying them land and resources in a northern state. Their hardship would have been even greater if Randolph had not spent significant amounts of time educating them and training them in various crafts (they could all read and write). As strange as it may seem, he viewed his slaves with great affection, and they reciprocated it; after he died, one of his slaves stayed behind, of his own account, to manage and care for his former owner's property; an unusual sight in Virginia of that time! And we forget how different the times were: beatings were commonplace, and the punishments often much worse on sea vessels, where the ship-captain was invested with absolute power; and this was a time when hunger, starvation, and early death, were real things to contend with. You get an idea of his position from this letter, written during the struggles (and potential famine looming) of the war of 1812:
As I often say: things in history are almost never black and white. Blaming slaveowners for everything is foolish considering the United States was set up with the right to own human property maintained by the Constitution--and the Constitution could never have been enacted without such a provision (and was barely ratified as it was). Effectively, the compromising acceptance of slavery is the only reason the United States exist as a country at all. Too many Americans are desperate to deny their past, and to pretend the bad things about it are someone else's fault (e.g. the "slave power" paranoia) to help externalise their disgust ("on the racists dammit, everything is their fault!!"). The South never in this period was the ascendent power: the North was, in both resources and manpower; and it's not like the North didn't use the South to its own benefit, through the use of tariffs, land grants, &c. There is a long history of New England businessmen robbing southerners of their land through double dealing and duplicity, dating all the way back to the Yazoo land scandal.
Originally Posted by Dresta
Not surprising to see the degenerates of ISHs come out all outraged about any country daring to pass any restriction on their beloved pornography. TheMan actually has a wife and still wanks to porn. Talk about having no self-control or self-discipline (or self-respect) whatsoever.
I don't think we should be putting people on trial for watching pornography, but it's becoming pretty evident that it is something of a scourge when it comes to relationships, sex, love, and all the finer human feelings. It ought to be discouraged and stigmatised. No person who treats other people like a commercial product, simply to be consumed, can think well of himself if he has any kind of conscience; as a result, to justify their perversions, the same people end up mocking and ridiculing genuine intimacy, which makes them feel increasingly uncomfortable expressing it themselves. A decline in intimacy must accompany the proliferation of pornography.
Douchebag of the year goes to Dresta, slaver owner apologist and porn hater
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|