Your agenda has been exposed. The Lakers had a better win% without Kobe in the early 2000s than they did with him. Someone made a thread about it just yesterday. Duncan having all the help.
Originally Posted by T_L_P The Lakers had a better win% without Kobe in the early 2000s than they did with him. Someone made a thread about it just yesterday. Shaq was mostly out early in the seasons. When the roleplayers were out of shape or just played like crap (2002-03). Kobe was mostly out at the end of seasons (2000-01), when everyone were sharp and ready for the PO.
Originally Posted by T_L_P Your agenda has been exposed. The Lakers had a better win% without Kobe in the early 2000s than they did with him. Someone made a thread about it just yesterday. Duncan having all the help. and the spurs have a better win % than the lakers from 99-04 LOL
Originally Posted by Magic 32 Shaq was mostly out early in the seasons. When the roleplayers were out of shape or just played like crap (2002-03). Kobe was mostly out at the end of seasons (2000-01), when everyone were sharp and ready for the PO. excuses The actual reason why they won more without Kobe is because he's not as impactful as Shaq: Career RAPM numbers('97 to '14) for both players: +5.08 - Shaq +2.96 - Kobe
Originally Posted by mehyaM24 and the spurs have a better win % than the lakers from 99-04 LOL Oh really? Maybe it's because they had a dominant player (their record was terrible without Duncan). 4-5 people just came in here and owned you. You've got nothing. Fool.
Is that Robert Shaw's new account?
Forum Rules