-
Re: Which critera for ranking players is accurate?
Originally Posted by iamgine
Would be better if you take the top 10 from 1st list and bottom 10 from 2nd list.
Sorry.. The whole point of the bottom 15 is to debunk the idiotic criteria of jordan/lebron/duncan fans
It works quite well dont ya think?
-
sahelanthropus
Re: Which critera for ranking players is accurate?
Originally Posted by kennethgriffin
It would average out. Each era would be represented. All equally biased. And not every great player has the same cliq
Meh.
I think we'd get a decent list if we held a poll on here. Just won't be able to rank Jordan, Kobe, LeBron because all three have rabid fanbases on ISH.
-
Re: Which critera for ranking players is accurate?
Why are duncan and lebron fans so quiet?
I thought it was allllllllll about mvps/mvps??????????????
F*ckin idiots lol
-
...
Re: Which critera for ranking players is accurate?
Originally Posted by kennethgriffin
Sorry.. The whole point of the bottom 15 is to debunk the idiotic criteria of jordan/lebron/duncan fans
It works quite well dont ya think?
1st list top 10 looks good but bottom doesn't.
2nd list top 10 looks bad but bottom looks better.
-
Re: Which critera for ranking players is accurate?
None of Russell's, Wilt's, or Kareem's MVPs are "ESPN MVPs" given that they all were voted by the players, not the media.
-
College star
Re: Which critera for ranking players is accurate?
no consistent criteria for top 10 all time will work just like MVP "criteria", does the best player on the best team earn the MVP or the player that turns a bottom feeder into a contender (i.e. steve nash)? need context
-
MH!
Re: Which critera for ranking players is accurate?
Second list is just plain retarded. Stockton at 22 and no Wade in the top 25?
-
3peat
Re: Which critera for ranking players is accurate?
Originally Posted by kennethgriffin
Why are duncan and lebron fans so quiet?
I thought it was allllllllll about mvps/mvps??????????????
F*ckin idiots lol
Why you giving Duncan shit tho
4 rings 3FMVPs 2 MVPs
-
Re: Which critera for ranking players is accurate?
Originally Posted by aj1987
Second list is just plain retarded. Stockton at 22 and no Wade in the top 25?
You cant seriously think wade is better than every single player in nba history that doesnt have a title? Do u?
Cause thats exactly what you're emplying by saying hes better than stockton.. Since your only argument would be rings
News flash. Wade was gifted that 06 title. And just making the finals in the 90s is 10 times more valuable than any miami team up ring chasing asterisk crap where wade is a willing kickstand to a lockout title or ray allen joke
Stockton is the all time leader in assists and steals. Hes arguably the greatest pure pg all time.
Wade looks forward to 3rd team all nba's in a week sg era. Meh
Last edited by kennethgriffin; 02-11-2014 at 12:19 AM.
-
Re: Which critera for ranking players is accurate?
Originally Posted by Warfan
Why you giving Duncan shit tho
4 rings 3FMVPs 2 MVPs
Cause his fans or haters trying to discredit kobe try throwing out rings and every aspect of basketball asside from the fact of 1 more fmvp/1 more season mvp to somehow win an argument
-
All Through Your Body
Re: Which critera for ranking players is accurate?
The first list actually looks legit. Can't argue with that.
-
MH!
Re: Which critera for ranking players is accurate?
Originally Posted by kennethgriffin
You cant seriously think wade is better than every single player in nba history that doesnt have a title? Do u?
Cause thats exactly what you're emplying by saying hes better than stockton.. Since your only argument would be rings
News flash. Wade was gifted that 06 title. And just making the finals in the 90s is 10 times more valuable than any miami team up ring chasing asterisk crap where wade is a willing kickstand to a lockout title or ray allen joke
Stockton is the all time leader in assists and steals. Hes arguably the greatest pure pg all time.
Wade looks forward to 3rd team all nba's in a week sg era. Meh
If I did think Wade was better than everyone without a ring, I would rank him over Barkley and Malone as well. My argument would be 3 rings, 1 FMVP, a career average of 25/5/5/2/1 on 50%.
Well, you do have Kobe at #5 with 5 carried rings (3 by Shaq and refs, '09 Gasol, and '10 Gasol + refs). Kobe has 5* rings. Take him out of the top 25 as well.
Also, you're talking about the stacked Heat teams and yet you have Cousy, Hondo, etc. in there.
-
3peat
Re: Which critera for ranking players is accurate?
Originally Posted by kennethgriffin
Cause his fans or haters trying to discredit kobe try throwing out rings and every aspect of basketball asside from the fact of 1 more fmvp/1 more season mvp to somehow win an argument
Yeah he deserves more credit for those first 3 rings than people give him, although I don't feel that his first title was that impressive tbh. Do u atleast feel that duncan has a case over kobe?
-
Re: Which critera for ranking players is accurate?
Originally Posted by aj1987
If I did think Wade was better than everyone without a ring, I would rank him over Barkley and Malone as well. My argument would be 3 rings, 1 FMVP, a career average of 25/5/5/2/1 on 50%.
Well, you do have Kobe at #5 with 5 carried rings (3 by Shaq and refs, '09 Gasol, and '10 Gasol + refs). Kobe has 5* rings. Take him out of the top 25 as well.
Also, you're talking about the stacked Heat teams and yet you have Cousy, Hondo, etc. in there.
Did you just say all 5 of kobes rings dont count due to playing with shaq/ unfair reffing/ and playing with gasol in defense of ......... Dwyane........ Wade?
Ok
....
-
MH!
Re: Which critera for ranking players is accurate?
Originally Posted by kennethgriffin
Did you just say all 5 of kobes rings dont count due to playing with shaq/ unfair reffing/ and playing with gasol in defense of ......... Dwyane........ Wade?
Ok
....
Yep. Just as you said that Wade's rings don't count in defense of Stockton.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|