Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 69
  1. #16
    NBA sixth man of the year Levity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    long beach bred
    Posts
    7,903

    Default Re: Should the Warriors stand pat if they win the title

    haha we should have all known that this thread was a veiled attempt to bring up another one of your trade scenarios trying to get WCS to the dubs.

  2. #17
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer DMAVS41's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    29,640

    Default Re: Should the Warriors stand pat if they win the title

    Quote Originally Posted by Young X
    Look what happened to the '12 Mavs.

    If it ain't broke don't fix it.
    Not relevant comparison.

    One team was old...the other is just getting started.

    They should probably move Lee if possible to open up enough room for Green and to add another player.

  3. #18
    Bran Fam Member ImKobe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Staples Center
    Posts
    26,484

    Default Re: Should the Warriors stand pat if they win the title

    Warriors are perfect as they are. Curry, Klay, Barnes and Green are all young and most likely will continue to develop their games, their bench is perfect as it is.

    If I'm the Warriors, I'm looking to move Lee's expiring for a bench piece or two to Philly or Boston.

  4. #19
    NBA lottery pick
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    5,519

    Default Re: Should the Warriors stand pat if they win the title

    Quote Originally Posted by Levity
    haha we should have all known that this thread was a veiled attempt to bring up another one of your trade scenarios trying to get WCS to the dubs.
    Yeah. I want my pipe dream to become a reality:

    Curry
    Klay
    Durant
    Green
    WCS

    I am obsessed with this pipe dream. Would the Kings even entertain a Bogut and Barnes for the 6th pick trade or is that crazy?

  5. #20
    College superstar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    4,592

    Default Re: Should the Warriors stand pat if they win the title

    I think so. They keep everyone, try and repeat. Whether they do or not, Lee is off the books for the 2016-17' season and they can go hard after Durant.

  6. #21
    RIP P Young X's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    6,667

    Default Re: Should the Warriors stand pat if they win the title

    Quote Originally Posted by DMAVS41
    Not relevant comparison.

    One team was old...the other is just getting started.

    They should probably move Lee if possible to open up enough room for Green and to add another player.
    It was stupid regardless. You don't tamper with championship teams. IDGAF how old they were.

    The Warriors have been a historically dominant team for most of the season in the toughest conference in league history.

    I'm not changing shit.

  7. #22
    NBA sixth man of the year Levity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    long beach bred
    Posts
    7,903

    Default Re: Should the Warriors stand pat if they win the title

    Quote Originally Posted by Ca$H
    Yeah. I want my pipe dream to become a reality:

    Curry
    Klay
    Durant
    Green
    WCS

    I am obsessed with this pipe dream. Would the Kings even entertain a Bogut and Barnes for the 6th pick trade or is that crazy?
    it's pretty crazy. i mean, you can go after ryan hollins from them, a very poor mans WCS, but thats about it.

  8. #23
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer DMAVS41's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    29,640

    Default Re: Should the Warriors stand pat if they win the title

    Quote Originally Posted by Young X
    It was stupid regardless. You don't break up championship teams idgaf how old they were.

    The Warriors have been a historically dominant team for most of the season in the toughest conference in league history.

    I'm not changing shit.
    What?

    Who is saying the Warriors should break up?

    I said they should probably move Lee...that isn't breaking them up.


    I don't care to debate the Mavs situation...it was obvious what the right thing to do was. It was one of the worst supporting casts to ever make the finals and doing it again the next a year older with a lockout looming wouldn't even have had real odds.

  9. #24
    NBA lottery pick
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    5,519

    Default Re: Should the Warriors stand pat if they win the title

    Quote Originally Posted by scm5
    I think so. They keep everyone, try and repeat. Whether they do or not, Lee is off the books for the 2016-17' season and they can go hard after Durant.
    What if Draymond gets a big contract? Can they give Durant the max still?

  10. #25
    Bad Username Rocketswin2013's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    4,312

    Default Re: Should the Warriors stand pat if they win the title

    They probably get trashed by a healthy OKC next year. Maybe even SA with Gasol. Eh, variables.

  11. #26
    3-time NBA All-Star oarabbus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    9,788

    Default Re: Should the Warriors stand pat if they win the title

    Quote Originally Posted by Ca$H
    Yeah. I want my pipe dream to become a reality:

    Curry
    Klay
    Durant
    Green
    WCS

    I am obsessed with this pipe dream. Would the Kings even entertain a Bogut and Barnes for the 6th pick trade or is that crazy?
    As a warriors fan, f*ck that shitty trade

  12. #27
    RIP P Young X's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    6,667

    Default Re: Should the Warriors stand pat if they win the title

    Quote Originally Posted by DMAVS41
    What?

    Who is saying the Warriors should break up?

    I said they should probably move Lee...that isn't breaking them up.


    I don't care to debate the Mavs situation...it was obvious what the right thing to do was. It was one of the worst supporting casts to ever make the finals and doing it again the next a year older with a lockout looming wouldn't even have had real odds.
    I meant tampering with them not breaking them up.

    You will forever defend the '12 Mavs and the Harden trade smh. You can't tell me that you wouldn't have wanted to see that team as they were properly defend their title.

  13. #28
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer DMAVS41's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    29,640

    Default Re: Should the Warriors stand pat if they win the title

    Quote Originally Posted by Young X
    I meant tampering with them not breaking them up.

    You will forever defend the '12 Mavs and the Harden trade smh. You can't tell me that you wouldn't have wanted to see that team as they were properly defend their title.
    Getting rid of Lee really isn't tampering...probably needs to happen.

    Of course I wanted us to contend again in 12...I just knew you aren't doing that with aging players. We couldn't have brought back Barea and Butler even if we wanted to.

    What sunk that team was Odom. If you are going to go hard on the Mavs...go after them for the Odom signing. They sign a good player instead of him with that space and we would have had a legit chance in the playoffs to make a run. We were just missing that one other reliable player.

    People forget, but Carter, West, Mahinmi, and Haywood actually were nice...they would have been even nicer in proper roles. We needed another guy...Odom just killed us.
    Last edited by DMAVS41; 06-12-2015 at 05:46 PM.

  14. #29
    NBA lottery pick
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    5,519

    Default Re: Should the Warriors stand pat if they win the title

    Quote Originally Posted by oarabbus
    As a warriors fan, f*ck that shitty trade
    It depends how high you are on WCS. I think WCS can become as good as peak KG on defense.

    Curry
    Klay
    Durant
    Green
    WCS

    Would become one of the greatest dynasties of all time.

  15. #30
    College superstar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    4,592

    Default Re: Should the Warriors stand pat if they win the title

    Quote Originally Posted by Ca$H
    What if Draymond gets a big contract? Can they give Durant the max still?

    The salary cap goes up to about $90m and they currently only have $50m in contracts for that season.

    If Draymond gets around $15m/yr that leaves around $25m for Durant. If that's not enough, they can probably move Iggy who would be 33 by then and an expiring.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •